Correction of Motion Artifacts Using a Multiscale Fully Convolutional Neural Network

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Andre JB,
   2. Bresnahan BW,
   3. Mossa-Basha M, et al

   . Toward quantifying the prevalence, severity, and cost associated with patient motion during clinical MR examinations. J Am Coll Radiology 2015;12:689–95 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.007 pmid:25963225

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Satterthwaite TD,
   2. Wolf DH,
   3. Loughead J, et al

   . Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. Neuroimage 2012;60:623–32 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063 pmid:22233733

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Schreiber-Zinaman J,
   2. Rosenkrantz AB

   . Frequency and reasons for extra sequences in clinical abdominal MRI examinations. Abdom Radiology (NY) 2017;42:306–11 doi:10.1007/s00261-016-0877-6 pmid:27549101

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Zaitsev M,
   2. Maclaren J,
   3. Herbst M

   . Motion artifacts in MRI: a complex problem with many partial solutions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:887–901 doi:10.1002/jmri.24850 pmid:25630632

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. McConnell MV,
   2. Khasgiwala VC,
   3. Savord BJ, et al

   . Prospective adaptive navigator correction for breath‐hold MR coronary angiography. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:148–52 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910370121 pmid:8978644

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Maclaren J,
   2. Herbst M,
   3. Speck O, et al

   . Prospective motion correction in brain imaging: a review. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:621–36 doi:10.1002/mrm.24314 pmid:22570274

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Atkinson D,
   2. Hill D

   . Reconstruction after rotational motion. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:183–87 doi:10.1002/mrm.10333 pmid:12509836

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kochunov P,
   2. Lancaster JL,
   3. Glahn DC, et al

   . Retrospective motion correction protocol for high‐resolution anatomical MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2006;27:957–62 doi:10.1002/hbm.20235 pmid:16628607

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Pipe JG

   . Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:963–69 doi:10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199911)42:5<963::aid-mrm17>3.0.co;2-l pmid:10542356

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. McGee KP,
    2. Manduca A,
    3. Felmlee JP, et al

    . Image metric-based correction (autocorrection) of motion effects: analysis of image metrics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:174–81 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(200002)11:2<174::AID-JMRI15>3.0.CO;2-3 pmid:10713951

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Loktyushin A,
    2. Nickisch H,
    3. Pohmann R, et al

    . Blind retrospective motion correction of MR images. Magn Reson Med 2013;70:1608–18 doi:10.1002/mrm.24615 pmid:23401078

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Krizhevsky A,
    2. Sutskever I,
    3. Hinton GE

    . Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 2012;1097–1105
13. 13.↵
    1. Long J,
    2. Shelhamer E,
    3. Darrell T

    . Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, Massachusetts. June 7–12, 2015
14. 14.↵
    1. Zhang K,
    2. Zuo W,
    3. Chen Y, et al

    . Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 2017;26:3142–55 doi:10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206 pmid:28166495

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Sommer K,
    2. Brosch T,
    3. Wiemker R, et al

    . Correction of motion artifacts using a multi-resolution fully convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of the Joint Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology, Paris, France. June 16–18, 2018
16. 16.↵
    1. Duffy BA,
    2. Zhang W,
    3. Tang H, et al

    . Retrospective correction of motion artifact affected structural MRI images using deep learning of simulated motion. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL 2018), Amsterdam, the Netherlands. June 4–6, 2018
17. 17.↵
    1. Kasdi NJ

    . Discrete simulation of colored noise and stochastic processes and 1/f/sup/α power law noise generation. Proceedings of the IEEE 1995;83:802–27 doi:10.1109/5.381848

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. Brosch T,
    2. Saalbach A

    . Foveal fully convolutional nets for multi-organ segmentation. In: Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing: SPIE Proceedings. Bellingham: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers; 2018
19. 19.↵
    1. Kingma DP,
    2. Ba J

    . Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego. May 7–9, 2015
20. 20.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Bovik AC,
    3. Sheikh HR, et al

    . Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 2004;13:600–12 doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 pmid:15376593

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Simonyan K,
    2. Zisserman A

    . Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv 2014;1409:1556
22. 22.↵
    1. He K,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Ren S, et al

    . Deep residual learning for image. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2016 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Nevada. June 27–30, 2016
23. 23.↵
    1. Szegedy C,
    2. Liu W,
    3. Jia Y, et al

    . Going deeper with convolutions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2015 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, Massachusetts. June 7–12, 2015
24. 24.↵
    1. Huang G,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Van Der Maaten L, et al

    . Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2017 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, Hawaii. June 21–26, 2017
25. 25.↵
    1. Zhao H,
    2. Gallo O,
    3. Frosio I, et al

    . Loss functions for image restoration with neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging 2017;3:47–57 doi:10.1109/TCI.2016.2644865

    CrossRef
26. 26.↵
    1. Johnson J,
    2. Alahi A,
    3. Fei-Fei L

    . Perceptual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, October 11–14, 2016
27. 27.↵
    1. Latif S,
    2. Asim M,
    3. Usman M, et al

    . Automating motion correction in multishot MRI using generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, Canada. December 2–8, 2018
28. 28.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Bovik AC

    . Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2009;26:98–117 doi:10.1109/MSP.2008.930649

    CrossRef
29. 29.↵
    1. Svoboda P,
    2. Hradis M,
    3. Marsik L, et al

    . CNN for license plate motion deblurring. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Phoenix, Arizona. September 25–28, 2016
30. 30.↵
    1. Schuler C,
    2. Hirsch M,
    3. Harmeling S, et al

    . Learning to deblur. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2016;38:1439–51 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2481418 pmid:26415157

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Heiland S

    . From A as in aliasing to Z as in zipper: artifacts in MRI. Clin Neuroradiol 2008;18:25–36 doi:10.1007/s00062-008-8003-y

    CrossRef