Prediction of Outcome Using Quantified Blood Volume in Aneurysmal SAH

References

1. 1.↵
   1. van Gijn J,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Rinkel GJ

   . Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 2007;369:306–18 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6 pmid:17258671

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Vergouwen MD,
   2. Jong-Tjien-Fa AV,
   3. Algra A, et al

   . Time trends in causes of death after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a hospital-based study. Neurology 2016;86:59–63 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002239 pmid:2659026

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Jaja BN,
   2. Cusimano MD,
   3. Etminan N, et al

   . Clinical prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2013;18:143–53 doi:10.1007/s12028-012-9792-z pmid:23138544

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Jaja BN,
   2. Saposnik G,
   3. Lingsma HF, et al

   ; SAHIT oration. Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study. BMJ 2018;360:j5745 doi:10.1136/bmj.j5745 pmid:29348138

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Kramer AH,
   2. Hehir M,
   3. Nathan B, et al

   . A comparison of 3 radiographic scales for the prediction of delayed ischemia and prognosis following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2008;109:199–207 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/109/8/0199 pmid:18671630

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Woo PY,
   2. Tse TP,
   3. Chan RS, et al

   . Computed tomography interobserver agreement in the assessment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and predictors for clinical outcome. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1118–24 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012576 pmid:29030464

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Fisher CM,
   2. Kistler JP,
   3. Davis JM

   . Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980;6:1–9 doi:10.1227/00006123-198001000-00001 pmid:7354892

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Hijdra A,
   2. van Gijn J,
   3. Nagelkerke NJ, et al

   . Prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia, rebleeding, and outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1988;19:1250–56 doi:10.1161/01.str.19.10.1250 pmid:3176085

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Boers AM,
   2. Zijlstra IA,
   3. Gathier CS, et al

   . Automatic quantification after subarachnoid hemorrhage on non-contrast computed tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2279–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4042 pmid:25104292

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Germans MR,
    2. Post R,
    3. Coert BA, et al

    . Ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid hemorrhage (ULTRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:143 doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-143 pmid:23680226

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Frontera JA,
    2. Claassen J,
    3. Schmidt JM, et al

    . Prediction of symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified Fisher scale. Neurosurgery 2006;59:21–27 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000218821.34014.1B pmid:16823296

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Vergouwen MD,
    2. Vermeulen M,
    3. van Gijn J, et al

    . Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke 2010;41:2391–95 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589275 pmid:20798370

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Little R,
    2. An H

    . Robust likelihood-based analysis of multivariate data with missing values. Statistica Sinica 2004;14:949–68
14. 14.↵
    1. Steyerberg EW

    . Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. Springer-Verlag; 2009
15. 15.↵
    1. Lagares A,
    2. Jiménez-Roldán L,
    3. Gomez PA, et al

    . Prognostic value of the amount of bleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2015;77:898–907 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000927 pmid:26308629

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Bleeker SE,
    2. Moll HA,
    3. Steyerberg EW, et al

    . External validation is necessary in prediction research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:826–32 doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00207-5 pmid:14505766

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. De Oliveira Manoel AL,
    2. Jaja BN,
    3. Germans MR, et al

    . The VASOGRADE: a simple grading scale for prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2015;46:1826–31 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008728 pmid:25977276

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Jaja BN,
    2. Lingsma H,
    3. Steyerberg EW, et al

    ; on behalf of SAHIT investigators. Neuroimaging characteristics of ruptured aneurysm as predictors of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: pooled analyses of the SAHIT cohort. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1703–11 doi:10.3171/2015.4.JNS142753 pmid:26495952

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. van Donkelaar CE,
    2. Bakker NA,
    3. Birks J, et al

    . Prediction of outcome after aneurysmal development. Stroke 2019;50:837–44 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023902

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Altman DG,
    2. Royston P

    . The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ 2006;332:1080 doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080 pmid:16675816

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. van der Jagt M,
    2. Hasan D,
    3. Bijvoet HW, et al

    . Interobserver variability of cisternal blood on CT after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2000;54:2156–58 doi:10.1212/wnl.54.11.2156 pmid:10851383

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Dengler NF,
    2. Diesing D,
    3. Sarrafzadeh A, et al

    . The Barrow Neurological Institute Scale revisited: predictive capabilities for cerebral infarction and clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2017;81:341–49 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw141 pmid:28201763

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Jabbarli R,
    2. Reinhard M,
    3. Roelz R, et al

    . Intracerebral hematoma due to aneurysm rupture: are there risk factors beyond aneurysm location? Neurosurgery 2016;78:813–20 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001136

    CrossRef
24. 24.
    1. Kramer AH,
    2. Mikolaenko I,
    3. Deis N, et al

    . Intraventricular hemorrhage volume predicts poor outcomes but not delayed ischemic neurological deficits among patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2010;67:1044–52 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ed1379 pmid:20881568

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Jabbarli R,
    2. Reinhard M,
    3. Roelz R, et al

    . The predictors and clinical impact of intraventricular hemorrhage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Int J Stroke 2016;11:68–76 doi:10.1177/1747493015607518 pmid:26763022

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Zijlstra IA,
    2. van der Steen WE,
    3. Verbaan D, et al

    . Ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms with a concomitant intraparenchymal hematoma: the role of hematoma volume. Neuroradiology 2018;60:335–42 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-1978-4 pmid:29356856

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Litjens G,
    2. Kooi T,
    3. Bejnordi BE, et al

    . A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 2017;42:60–88 doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 pmid:28778026

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Sano H,
    2. Satoh A,
    3. Murayama Y, et al

    ; members of the 38 registered institutions and WFNS Cerebrovascular Disease & Treatment Committee. Modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system. World Neurosurg 2015;83:801–07 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.032 pmid:25535068

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Bar B,
    2. Hemphill JC

    . Charlson comorbidity index adjustment in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2011;42:2944–46 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.617639 pmid:21799172

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Altman DG,
    2. Vergouwe Y,
    3. Royston P, et al

    . Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 2009;338:b605 doi:10.1136/bmj.b605 pmid:19477892

    FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Moons KGM,
    2. Altman DG,
    3. Vergouwe Y, et al

    . Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. BMJ 2009;338:b606 doi:10.1136/bmj.b606 pmid:19502216

    FREE Full Text