Multishell Diffusion MRI–Based Tractography of the Facial Nerve in Vestibular Schwannoma

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Samii M,
   2. Gerganov VM,
   3. Samii A

   . Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2010;112:860–67 doi:10.3171/2009.7.JNS0989 pmid:19663543

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Mazzoni A,
   2. Zanoletti E,
   3. Denaro L, et al

   . Retrolabyrinthine meatotomy as part of retrosigmoid approach to expose the whole internal auditory canal: rationale, technique, and outcome in hearing preservation surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;14:36–44 doi:10.1093/ons/opx091 pmid:29253291

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Youssef AS,
   2. Downes AE

   . Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: advances and clinical implications. Neurosurg Focus 2009;27:E9 doi:10.3171/2009.8.FOCUS09144 pmid:19795957

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Sartoretti-Schefer S,
   2. Kollias S,
   3. Valavanis A

   . Spatial relationship between vestibular schwannoma and facial nerve on three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:810–16 pmid:10815653

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Baro V,
   2. Landi A,
   3. Brigadoi S, et al

   . Preoperative prediction of facial nerve in patients with vestibular schwannomas: the role of diffusion tensor imaging—a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2019;125:24–31 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.099 pmid:30708084

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Jeurissen B,
   2. Tournier J-D,
   3. Dhollander T, et al

   . Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 2014;103:411–26 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061 pmid:25109526

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Tournier JD,
   2. Calamante F,
   3. Connelly A

   . Determination of the appropriate b value and number of gradient directions for high-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging. NMR Biomed 2013;26:1775–86 doi:10.1002/nbm.3017 pmid:24038308

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. House JW,
   2. Brackmann DE

   . Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:146–47 doi:10.1177/019459988509300202 pmid:3921901

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Koos WT,
   2. Day JD,
   3. Matula C, et al

   . Neurotopographic considerations in the microsurgical treatment of small acoustic neurinomas. J Neurosurg 1998;88:506–12 doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.3.0506 pmid:9488305

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Veraart J,
    2. Novikov DS,
    3. Christiaens D, et al

    . Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 2016;142:394–406 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016 pmid:27523449

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Andersson JL,
    2. Skare S,
    3. Ashburner J

    . How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2003;20:870–88 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00336-7 pmid:14568458

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Andersson JL,
    2. Sotiropoulos SN

    . An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 2016;125:1063–78 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019 pmid:26481672

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Avants BB,
    2. Tustison NJ,
    3. Song G, et al

    . A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 2011;54:2033–44 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 pmid:20851191

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Dhollander T,
    2. Raffelt D,
    3. Connelly A

    . Accuracy of response function estimation algorithms for 3-tissue spherical deconvolution of diverse quality diffusion MRI data. In: Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology and the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Paris, France. June 16–18, 2018:1569
15. 15.↵
    1. Tournier J-D,
    2. Calamante F.
    3. Connelly A

    . Improved probabilistic streamlines tractography by 2nd order integration over fibre orientation distributions. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden. May 6–13, 2010:1670
16. 16.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Piven J,
    3. Hazlett HC, et al

    . User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 2006;31:1116–28 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015 pmid:16545965

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Yoshino M,
    2. Kin T,
    3. Ito A, et al

    . Combined use of diffusion tensor tractography and multifused contrast-enhanced FIESTA for predicting facial and cochlear nerve positions in relation to vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 2015;123:1480–88 doi:10.3171/2014.11.JNS14988 pmid:26053235

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Zolal A,
    2. Juratli TA,
    3. Podlesek D, et al

    . Probabilistic tractography of the cranial nerves in vestibular schwannoma. World Neurosurg 2017;107:47–53 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.102 pmid:28754643

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Tournier JD,
    2. Calamante F,
    3. Connelly A

    . MRtrix: diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 2012;22:53–66 doi:10.1002/ima.22005

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Sampath P,
    2. Rini D,
    3. Long DM

    . Microanatomical variations in the cerebellopontine angle associated with vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): a retrospective study of 1006 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 2000;92:70–78 doi:10.3171/jns.2000.92.1.0070 pmid:10616085

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Setsompop K,
    2. Cohen-Adad J,
    3. Gagoski BA, et al

    . Improving diffusion MRI using simultaneous multi-slice echo planar imaging. Neuroimage 2012;63:569–80 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.033 pmid:22732564

    CrossRefPubMed