The Evaluation and Prediction of Laminoplasty Surgery Outcome in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Using Diffusion Tensor MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Tetreault L,
   3. Goldstein CL,
   4. Arnold P, et al

   . Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a spectrum of related disorders affecting the aging spine. Neurosurgery 2015;77:S51–67 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000951 pmid:26378358

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Basser PJ,
   3. Mattiello J,
   4. Lebihan D

   . MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 1994;66:259–67 doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1 pmid:8130344

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Demir A,
   3. Ries M,
   4. Moonen CT, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Radiology 2003;229:37–43 doi:10.1148/radiol.2291020658 pmid:14519868

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Kerkovsky M,
   3. Bednarik J,
   4. Dusek L, et al

   . Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression: correlations between clinical and electrophysiological findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:48–56 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820e6c35 pmid:21228747

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Vedantam A,
   3. Rao A,
   4. Kurpad SN, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with short-term myelopathy outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. World Neurosurg 2017;97:489–94 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.075 pmid:27046013

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Ellingson BM,
   3. Salamon N,
   4. Grinstead JW, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging predicts functional impairment in mild-to-moderate cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 2014;14:2589–97 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.027 pmid:24561036

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Guan L,
   3. Chen X,
   4. Hai Y, et al

   . High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary follow-up study. NMR Biomed 2017;30 doi:10.1002/nbm.3769 pmid:28703331

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Bhosale S,
   3. Ingale P,
   4. Srivastava S, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging as an additional postoperative prognostic predictor factor in cervical myelopathy patients: an observational study. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2019;10:10–13 doi:10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_77_18 pmid:31000973

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Jones JG,
   3. Cen SY,
   4. Lebel RM, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with the clinical assessment of disease severity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and predicts outcome following surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:471–78 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3199 pmid:22821918

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Yoo WK,
    3. Kim TH,
    4. Hai DM, et al

    . Correlation of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and clinical findings of cervical myelopathy. Spine J 2013;13:867–76 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.005 pmid:23523441

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Gao SJ,
    3. Yuan X,
    4. Jiang XY, et al

    . Correlation study of 3T-MR-DTI measurements and clinical symptoms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1940–45 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.011 pmid:23932097

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Furlan JC,
    3. Catharine Craven B

    . Psychometric analysis and critical appraisal of the original, revised, and modified versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in the assessment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurg Focus 2016;40:E6 doi:10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1648 pmid:27246489

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Ma X,
    3. Han X,
    4. Jiang W, et al

    . A follow-up study of postoperative DCM patients using diffusion MRI with DTI and NODDI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018;43:E898–904 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002541] pmid:29300252

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Iwasaki M,
    3. Yokohama T,
    4. Oura D, et al

    . Decreased value of highly accurate fractional anisotropy using 3-Tesla ZOOM diffusion tensor imaging after decompressive surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: aligned fibers effect. World Neurosurg X 2019;4:100056 doi:10.1016/j.wnsx.2019.100056 pmid:31468032

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Wen CY,
    3. Cui JL,
    4. Liu HS, et al

    . Is diffusion anisotropy a biomarker for disease severity and surgical prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Radiology 2014;270:197–204 doi:10.1148/radiol.13121885

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Maki S,
    3. Koda M,
    4. Kitamura M, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging can predict surgical outcomes of patients with cervical compression myelopathy. Eur Spine J 2017;26:2459–66 doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5191-7 pmid:28623403

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kitamura M,
    3. Maki S,
    4. Koda M, et al

    . Longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy following decompression surgery. J Clin Neurosci 2020;74:194–98 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.018 pmid:31201048

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Shabani S,
    3. Kaushal M,
    4. Budde M, et al

    . Comparison between quantitative measurements of diffusion tensor imaging and T2 signal intensity in a large series of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients for assessment of disease severity and prognostication of recovery. J Neurosurg Spine 2019 Jun 7. [Epub ahead of Print] doi:10.3171/2019.3.SPINE181328 pmid:31174184

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Wilm BJ,
    3. Svensson J,
    4. Henning A, et al

    . Reduced field-of-view MRI using outer volume suppression for spinal cord diffusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:625–30 doi:10.1002/mrm.21167 pmid:17326167

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Wargo CJ,
    3. Gore JC

    . Localized high-resolution DTI of the human midbrain using single-shot EPI, parallel imaging, and outer-volume suppression at 7T. Magn Reson Imaging 2013;31:810–19 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.01.013 pmid:23541390

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. De Leener B,
    3. Levy S,
    4. Dupont SM, et al

    . SCT: Spinal Cord Toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 2017;145:24–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.009 pmid:27720818

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Beckmann CF,
    4. Behrens TE, et al

    . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Jiang H,
    3. van Zijl PC,
    4. Kim J, et al

    . DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006;81:106–16 doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.08.004 pmid:16413083

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Bernabeu-Sanz A,
    3. Molla-Torro JV,
    4. Lopez-Celada S, et al

    . MRI evidence of brain atrophy, white matter damage, and functional adaptive changes in patients with cervical spondylosis and prolonged spinal cord compression. Eur Radiol 2020;30:357–69 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06352-z pmid:31350584

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Cui L,
    3. Kong C,
    4. Chen X, et al

    . Changes in diffusion tensor imaging indices of the lumbosacral enlargement correlate with cervical spinal cord changes and clinical assessment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019;186:105282 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.02.014 pmid:31569059

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Budzik JF,
    3. Balbi V,
    4. Le Thuc V, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Radiol 2011;21:426–33 doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1927-z pmid:20725834

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Kang M,
    3. Anderer E,
    4. Elliott R, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging of the spondylotic cervical spinal cord: a preliminary study of quantifiable markers in the evaluation for surgical decompression. Internet J Head Neck Surg 2011;5. https://print.ispub.com/api/0/ispub-article/6765. Accessed January 15, 2019
28. 28.↵
    2. Poplawski MM,
    3. Alizadeh M,
    4. Oleson CV, et al

    . Application of diffusion tensor imaging in forecasting neurological injury and recovery after human cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2019;36:3051–61 doi:10.1089/neu.2018.6092 pmid:31057044

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Guleria S,
    3. Gupta RK,
    4. Saksena S, et al

    . Retrograde Wallerian degeneration of cranial corticospinal tracts in cervical spinal cord injury patients using diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurosci Res 2008;86:2271–80 doi:10.1002/jnr.21664 pmid:18335542

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Wargo C,
    3. Jankiewicz M,
    4. Gore J

    . Comparison of reduced FOV techniques for high resolution imaging at 7T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2010;3012
31. 31.↵
    2. Jeong EK,
    3. Kim SE,
    4. Guo J, et al

    . High-resolution DTI with 2D interleaved multislice reduced FOV single-shot diffusion-weighted EPI (2D ss-rFOV-DWEPI). Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1575–79 doi:10.1002/mrm.20711 pmid:16254946

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Kim TH,
    3. Zollinger L,
    4. Shi XF, et al

    . Quantification of diffusivities of the human cervical spinal cord using a 2D single-shot interleaved multisection inner volume diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:682–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1881 pmid:20019109

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Park EH,
    3. Lee YH,
    4. Jeong EK, et al

    . Diffusion tensor imaging focusing on lower cervical spinal cord using 2D reduced FOV interleaved multislice single-shot diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging: comparison with conventional single-shot diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2015;33:401–06 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2015.01.007 pmid:25614215

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Lee S,
    3. Lee YH,
    4. Chung TS, et al

    . Accuracy of diffusion tensor imaging for diagnosing cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients showing spinal cord compression. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:1303–12 doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1303 pmid:26576120

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Sigmund EE,
    3. Suero GA,
    4. Hu C, et al

    . High-resolution human cervical spinal cord imaging at 7 T. NMR Biomed 2012;25:891–99 doi:10.1002/nbm.1809 pmid:22183956

    CrossRefPubMed