Effects of Acquisition Parameter Modifications and Field Strength on the Reproducibility of Brain Perfusion Measurements Using Arterial Spin-Labeling

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Detre JA,
   2. Leigh JS,
   3. Williams DS, et al

   . Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;23:37–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910230106 pmid:1734182

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Telischak NA,
   2. Detre JA,
   3. Zaharchuk G

   . Arterial spin labeling MRI: clinical applications in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:1165–80 doi:10.1002/jmri.24751 pmid:25236477

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Detre JA,
   2. Rao H,
   3. Wang DJ, et al

   . Applications of arterial spin labeled MRI in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:1026–37 doi:10.1002/jmri.23581 pmid:22246782

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Hendrikse J,
   2. Petersen ET,
   3. Golay X

   . Vascular disorders: insights from arterial spin labeling. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2012;22:259–69 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2012.02.003 pmid:22548931

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Garcia DM,
   2. Duhamel G,
   3. Alsop DC

   . Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:366–72 doi:10.1002/mrm.20556 pmid:16032674

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Ye FQ,
   2. Frank JA,
   3. Weinberger DR, et al

   . Noise reduction in 3D perfusion imaging by attenuating the static signal in arterial spin tagging (ASSIST). Magn Reson Med 2000;44:92–100 doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200007)44:1<92::AID-MRM14>3.0.CO;2-M pmid:10893526

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Günther M,
   2. Oshio K,
   3. Feinberg DA

   . Single-shot 3D imaging techniques improve arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:491–98 doi:10.1002/mrm.20580 pmid:16032686

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Alsop DC,
   2. Detre JA,
   3. Golay X, et al

   . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM Perfusion Study group and the European Consortium for ASL in Dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16 doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Keil VC,
   2. Smits M,
   3. Thust S, et al

   . The long road from invention to implementation: a PAN-European neuroradiological survey on quantitative MRI techniques in clinical practice. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Virtual; August 8–14, 2020
10. 10.↵
    1. Mutsaerts HJ,
    2. Steketee RM,
    3. Heijtel DF, et al

    . Inter-vendor reproducibility of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at 3 Tesla. PLoS One 2014;9:e104108 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104108 pmid:25090654

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Mutsaerts HJ,
    2. van Osch MJ,
    3. Zelaya FO, et al

    . Multi-vendor reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI using a near-identical sequence: implications for multi-center studies. Neuroimage 2015;113:143–52 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.043 pmid:25818685

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Zaharchuk G

    . Arterial spin labeling for acute stroke: practical considerations. Transl Stroke Res 2012;3:228–35 doi:10.1007/s12975-012-0159-8 pmid:24323778

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Heijtel DF,
    2. Mutsaerts HJ,
    3. Bakker E, et al

    . Accuracy and precision of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion during baseline and hypercapnia: a head-to-head comparison with 15O H2O positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 2014;92:182–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.011 pmid:24531046

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Wang DJ,
    3. Detre JA

    . Test-retest reliability of arterial spin labeling with common labeling strategies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:940–49 doi:10.1002/jmri.22345 pmid:21448961

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Gevers S,
    2. van Osch MJ,
    3. Bokkers RP, et al

    . Intra- and multicenter reproducibility of pulsed, continuous and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling methods for measuring cerebral perfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:1706–15 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2011.10 pmid:21304555

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Biagi L,
    2. Abbruzzese A,
    3. Bianchi MC, et al

    . Age dependence of cerebral perfusion assessed by magnetic resonance continuous arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:696–702 doi:10.1002/jmri.20839 pmid:17279531

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Asllani I,
    2. Borogovac A,
    3. Brown TR

    . Regression algorithm correcting for partial volume effects in arterial spin labeling MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1362–71 doi:10.1002/mrm.21670 pmid:18828149

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Mutsaerts HJ,
    2. Petr J,
    3. Václavů L, et al

    . The spatial coefficient of variation in arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow images. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:3184–92 doi:10.1177/0271678X16683690 pmid:28058975

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ibaraki M,
    2. Nakamura K,
    3. Toyoshima H, et al

    . Spatial coefficient of variation in pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling cerebral blood flow images as a hemodynamic measure for cerebrovascular steno-occlusive disease: a comparative 15 O positron emission tomography study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019;39:173–81 doi:10.1177/0271678X18781667 pmid:29869933

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Robertson AD,
    2. Matta G,
    3. Basile VS, et al

    . Temporal and spatial variances in arterial spin-labeling are inversely related to large-artery blood velocity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1555–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5257 pmid:28619834

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Mutsaerts HJ,
    2. Petr J,
    3. Bokkers RP, et al

    . Spatial coefficient of variation of arterial spin labeling MRI as a cerebrovascular correlate of carotid occlusive disease. PLoS One 2020;15:e0229444 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229444 pmid:32101567

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Mutsaerts HJ,
    2. Petr J,
    3. Groot P, et al

    . ExploreASL: an image processing pipeline for multi-center ASL perfusion MRI studies. Neuroimage 2020;219:117031 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117031 pmid:32526385

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Pfefferbaum A,
    2. Chanraud S,
    3. Pitel AL, et al

    . Partial volume segmentation with adaptive maximum a posteriori (MAP) approach. Psychiatry Res 2010;182:266–73 doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.02.010 pmid:20488671

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Petr J,
    2. Mutsaerts HJ,
    3. De Vita E, et al

    . Effects of systematic partial volume errors on the estimation of gray matter cerebral blood flow with arterial spin labeling MRI. MAGMA 2018;31:725–34 doi:10.1007/s10334-018-0691-y pmid:29916058

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Mezue M,
    2. Segerdahl AR,
    3. Okell TW, et al

    . Optimization and reliability of multiple postlabeling delay pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling during rest and stimulus-induced functional task activation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014;34:1919–27 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.163 pmid:25269517

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Wu B,
    2. Lou X,
    3. Wu X, et al

    . Intra- and interscanner reliability and reproducibility of 3D whole-brain pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeling MR perfusion at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:402–09 doi:10.1002/jmri.24175 pmid:23723043

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Wilson DA,
    3. Ulatowski JA, et al

    . Two-compartment exchange model for perfusion quantification using arterial spin tagging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21:440–55 doi:10.1097/00004647-200104000-00013 pmid:11323530

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Petersen ET,
    2. Lim T,
    3. Golay X

    . Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:219–32 doi:10.1002/mrm.20784 pmid:16416430

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Chappell MA,
    2. Woolrich MW,
    3. Petersen ET, et al

    . Comparing model-based and model-free analysis methods for QUASAR arterial spin labeling perfusion quantification. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:1466–75 doi:10.1002/mrm.24372 pmid:22711674

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Liu P,
    3. Lu H, et al

    . Fast measurement of blood T1 in the human carotid artery at 3T: accuracy, precision, and reproducibility. Magn Reson Med 2017;77:2296–2302 doi:10.1002/mrm.26325 pmid:27436420

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Kilroy E,
    2. Apostolova L,
    3. Liu C, et al

    . Reliability of two-dimensional and three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in elderly populations: comparison with 15o-water positron emission tomography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:931–39 doi:10.1002/jmri.24246 pmid:24038544

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Vidorreta M,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Rodriguez I, et al

    . Comparison of 2D and 3D single-shot ASL perfusion fMRI sequences. Neuroimage 2013;66:662–71 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.087 pmid:23142069

    CrossRefPubMed