Artificial Intelligence and Acute Stroke Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ovbiagele B,
   2. Nguyen-Huynh MN

   . Stroke epidemiology: advancing our understanding of disease mechanism and therapy. Neurotherapeutics 2011;8:319–29 doi:10.1007/s13311-011-0053-1 pmid:21691873

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Donkor ES

   . Stroke in the 21(st) century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Res Treat 2018;2018:3238165 doi:10.1155/2018/3238165 pmid:30598741

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Boehme AK,
   2. Esenwa C,
   3. Elkind MSV

   . Stroke risk factors, genetics, and prevention. Circ Res 2017;120:472–95 doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308398 pmid:28154098

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Lee EJ,
   2. Kim YH,
   3. Kim N, et al

   . Deep into the brain: artificial intelligence in stroke imaging. J Stroke 2017;19:277–85 doi:10.5853/jos.2017.02054 pmid:29037014

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Goodfellow I,
   2. Bengio Y,
   3. Courville A

   . Deep Learning. The MIT Press 2016
6. 6.↵
   1. Saeys Y,
   2. Inza I,
   3. Larrañaga P

   . A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2507–17 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm344 pmid:17720704

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Dreiseitl S,
   2. Ohno-Machado L

   . Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inform 2002;35:352–59 doi:10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00034-0 pmid:12968784

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Wang S,
   2. Summers RM

   . Machine learning and radiology. Med Image Anal 2012;16:933–51 doi:10.1016/j.media.2012.02.005 pmid:22465077

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Jordan MI,
   2. Mitchell TM

   . Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 2015;349:255–60 doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 pmid:26185243

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. He K,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. Ren S, et al

    . Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv:1512:03385;10 Dec 2015;1–12
11. 11.↵
    1. Krizhevsky A,
    2. Sutskever I,
    3. Hinton G

    . Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Proc Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2012;1090–98
12. 12.↵
    1. Krizhevsky A,
    2. Sutskever I,
    3. Hinton GE

    . Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Neural information processing systems. Stateline 2012;1097–1105
13. 13.↵
    1. Setio AA,
    2. Ciompi F,
    3. Litjens G, et al

    . Pulmonary nodule detection in CT images: false positive reduction using multi-view convolutional networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:1160–69 doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2536809 pmid:26955024

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Roth HR,
    2. Lu L,
    3. Liu J, et al

    . Improving computer-aided detection using convolutional neural networks and random view aggregation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:1170–81 doi:10.1109/TMI.2015.2482920 pmid:26441412

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Qi D,
    2. Hao C,
    3. Lequan Y, et al

    . Automatic detection of cerebral microbleeds from MR images via 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:1182–95 doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2528129 pmid:26886975

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Zou KH,
    2. Warfield SK,
    3. Bharatha A, et al

    . Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index1: scientific reports. Acad Radiol 2004;11:178–89 doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00671-8

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Yamashita R,
    2. Nishio M,
    3. Do RKG, et al

    . Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology. Insights Imaging 2018;9:611–29 doi:10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9 pmid:29934920

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Murray NM,
    2. Unberath M,
    3. Hager GD, et al

    . Artificial intelligence to diagnose ischemic stroke and identify large vessel occlusions: a systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:156–64 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015135

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Liew S-L,
    2. Anglin JM,
    3. Banks NW, et al

    . A large, open source dataset of stroke anatomical brain images and manual lesion segmentations. Sci Data 2018;5:180011 doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.11 pmid:29461514

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Chilamkurthy S,
    2. Ghosh R,
    3. Tanamala S, et al

    . Development and validation of deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans. arXiv :1803:05854;30 March 2018; 1–18
21. 21.↵
    1. Flanders AE,
    2. Prevedello LM,
    3. Shih G, et al

    . Construction of a machine learning dataset through collaboration: the RSNA 2019 brain CT hemorrhage challenge. Radiol Art Int 2020;2:e190211 doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190211

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. Winzeck S,
    2. Hakim A,
    3. McKinley R, et al

    . ISLES 2016 and 2017—benchmarking ischemic stroke lesion outcome prediction based on multispectral MRI. Front Neurol 2018;9:679 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00679 pmid:30271370

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Clèrigues A,
    2. Valverde S,
    3. Bernal J, et al

    . Acute ischemic stroke lesion core segmentation in CT perfusion images using fully convolutional neural networks. Comput Biol Med 2019;115:103487 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103487 pmid:31629272

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    American Society of Functional Neuroradiology. ASFNR Ai challenge. https://aichallenge.asfnr.org. Accessed July 5, 2020
25. 25.↵
    1. Nogueira RG,
    2. Jadhav AP,
    3. Haussen DC, et al

    . Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Bonafe A, et al

    . Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Albers GW,
    2. Marks MP,
    3. Kemp S, et al

    . Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Campbell BCV,
    2. Mitchell PJ,
    3. Kleinig TJ, et al

    . Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Wismüller A,
    2. Stockmaster L

    . A prospective randomized clinical trial for measuring radiology study reporting time on artificial Intelligence-based detection of intracranial hemorrhage in emergent care head CT. arXiv :2002:12515; 28 Feb 2020; 1–7
30. 30.↵
    1. Tang FH,
    2. Ng DK,
    3. Chow DH

    . An image feature approach for computer-aided detection of ischemic stroke. Comput Biol Med 2011;41:529–36 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.05.001 pmid:21605853

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Abedi V,
    2. Goyal N,
    3. Tsivgoulis G, et al

    . Novel screening tool for stroke using artificial neural network. Stroke 2017;48:1678–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017033 pmid:28438906

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Bentley P,
    3. Rueckert D

    . Fully automatic acute ischemic lesion segmentation in DWI using convolutional neural networks. NeuroImage Clin 2017;15:633–43 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.016 pmid:28664034

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Guerrero R,
    2. Qin C,
    3. Oktay O, et al

    . White matter hyperintensity and stroke lesion segmentation and differentiation using convolutional neural networks. NeuroImage Clin 2018;17:918–34 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.022 pmid:29527496

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Oman O,
    2. Makela T,
    3. Salli E, et al

    . 3D convolutional neural networks applied to CT angiography in the detection of acute ischemic stroke. Eur Radiol Exp 2019;3:8 doi:10.1186/s41747-019-0085-6 pmid:30758694

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Kasasbeh AS,
    2. Christensen S,
    3. Parsons MW, et al

    . Artificial neural network computer tomography perfusion prediction of ischemic core. Stroke 2019;50:1578–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022649 pmid:31092162

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Qiu W,
    2. Kuang H,
    3. Teleg E, et al

    . Machine learning for detecting early infarction in acute stroke with non–contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 2020;294:638–44 doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191193 pmid:31990267

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Takahashi N,
    2. Lee Y,
    3. Tsai D-Y, et al

    . An automated detection method for the MCA dot sign of acute stroke in unenhanced CT. Radiol Phys Technol 2014;7:79–88 doi:10.1007/s12194-013-0234-1 pmid:23996520

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Chen Z,
    2. Zhang R,
    3. Xu F, et al

    . Novel prehospital prediction model of large vessel occlusion using artificial neural network. Front Aging Neurosci 2018;10:181 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2018.00181 pmid:29997494

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Chatterjee A,
    2. Somayaji NR,
    3. Kabakis IM

    . Abstract WMP16: artificial intelligence detection of cerebrovascular large vessel occlusion—nine month, 650 patient evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy and performance of the Viz.ai LVO algorithm. Stroke 2019;50:AWMP16 doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.WMP16

    CrossRef
40. 40.↵
    1. Barreira C,
    2. Bouslama M,
    3. Lim J, et al

    . E-108 Aladin study: automated large artery occlusion detection in stroke imaging study—a multicenter analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:A101–02 doi:10.1136/neurointsurg-2018-SNIS.184

    CrossRef
41. 41.↵
    1. Goyal M,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Menon BK, et al

    . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Jovin TG,
    2. Chamorro A,
    3. Cobo E, et al

    . Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–2306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Nagel S,
    2. Sinha D,
    3. Day D, et al

    . e-ASPECTS software is non-inferior to neuroradiologists in applying the ASPECT score to computed tomography scans of acute ischemic stroke patients. Int J Stroke 2017;12:615–22 doi:10.1177/1747493016681020 pmid:27899743

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Guberina N,
    2. Dietrich U,
    3. Radbruch A, et al

    . Detection of early infarction signs with machine learning-based diagnosis by means of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) in the clinical routine. Neuroradiology 2018;60:889–901 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-2066-5 pmid:30066278

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Kuang H,
    2. Najm M,
    3. Chakraborty D, et al

    . Automated ASPECTS on noncontrast CT scans in patients with acute ischemic stroke using machine learning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:33–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5889 pmid:30498017

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Maegerlein C,
    2. Fischer J,
    3. Monch S, et al

    . Automated calculation of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score: feasibility and reliability. Radiology 2019;291:141–48 doi:10.1148/radiol.2019181228 pmid:30720400

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Albers GW,
    2. Wald MJ,
    3. Mlynash M, et al

    . Automated calculation of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score: validation in patients with large hemispheric infarct. Stroke 2019;50:3277–79 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026430 pmid:31500555

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Grunwald IQ,
    2. Kulikovski J,
    3. Reith W, et al

    . Collateral automation for triage in stroke: evaluating automated scoring of collaterals in acute stroke on computed tomography scans. Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;47:217–22 doi:10.1159/000500076 pmid:31216543

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Wang K,
    2. Shou Q,
    3. Ma SJ, et al

    . Deep learning detection of penumbral tissue on arterial spin labeling in stroke. Stroke 2020;51:489–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027457 pmid:31884904

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Ho KC,
    2. Speier W,
    3. Zhang H, et al

    . A machine learning approach for classifying ischemic stroke onset time from imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2019;38:1666–76 doi:10.1109/TMI.2019.2901445 pmid:30802855

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Lee H,
    2. Lee E-J,
    3. Ham S, et al

    . Machine learning approach to identify stroke within 4.5 hours. Stroke 2020;51:860–66 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027611 pmid:31987014

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Wu O,
    2. Koroshetz WJ,
    3. Østergaard L, et al

    . Predicting tissue outcome in acute human cerebral ischemia using combined diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging. Stroke 2001;32:933–42 doi:10.1161/01.str.32.4.933 pmid:11283394

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. 53.↵
    1. Stier N,
    2. Vincent N,
    3. Liebeskind D, et al

    . Deep learning of tissue fate features in acute ischemic stroke. Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed) 2015;2015:1316–21 doi:10.1109/BIBM.2015.7359869 pmid:28919983

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Nielsen A,
    2. Hansen MB,
    3. Tietze A, et al

    . Prediction of tissue outcome and assessment of treatment effect in acute ischemic stroke using deep learning. Stroke 2018;49:1394–1401 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019740 pmid:29720437

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    1. Ho KC,
    2. Scalzo F,
    3. Sarma K, et al

    . Predicting ischemic stroke tissue fate using a deep convolutional neural network on source magnetic resonance perfusion images. J Med Imag 2019;6:1 doi:10.1117/1.JMI.6.2.026001 pmid:31131293

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Xie Y,
    3. Thamm T, et al

    . Use of deep learning to predict final ischemic stroke lesions from initial magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e200772 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0772 pmid:32163165

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Pfaff J,
    2. Herweh C,
    3. Schieber S, et al

    . e-ASPECTS correlates with and is predictive of outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1594–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5236 pmid:28596195

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    1. Tang T-Y,
    2. Jiao Y,
    3. Cui Y, et al

    . Development and validation of a penumbra-based predictive model for thrombolysis outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients. EBioMedicine 2018;35:251–59 doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.028 pmid:30146341

    CrossRefPubMed
59. 59.↵
    1. Xie Y,
    2. Jiang B,
    3. Gong E, et al

    . Use of gradient boosting machine learning to predict patient outcome in acute ischemic stroke on the basis of imaging, demographic, and clinical information. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019;212:44–51 doi:10.2214/AJR.18.20260 pmid:30354266

    CrossRefPubMed
60. 60.↵
    1. Nishi H,
    2. Oishi N,
    3. Ishii A, et al

    . Predicting clinical outcomes of large vessel occlusion before mechanical thrombectomy using machine learning. Stroke 2019;50:2379–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025411 pmid:31409267

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    1. Bacchi S,
    2. Zerner T,
    3. Oakden-Rayner L, et al

    . Deep learning in the prediction of ischaemic stroke thrombolysis functional outcomes: a pilot study. Acad Radiol 2020;27:e19–23 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2019.03.015 pmid:31053480

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Guo D,
    3. Lou M, et al

    . Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation severity in acute stroke from source perfusion MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2018;65:2058–65 doi:10.1109/TBME.2017.2783241 pmid:29989941

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    1. Desai V,
    2. Flanders A,
    3. Lakhani P

    . Application of deep learning in neuroradiology: automated detection of basal ganglia hemorrhage using 2D-convolutional neural networks. arXiv :1710:03823;10 Oct 2017;1–7
64. 64.↵
    1. Chilamkurthy S,
    2. Ghosh R,
    3. Tanamala S, et al

    . Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet 2018;392:2388–96 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3 pmid:30318264

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    1. Arbabshirani MR,
    2. Fornwalt BK,
    3. Mongelluzzo GJ, et al

    . Advanced machine learning in action: identification of intracranial hemorrhage on computed tomography scans of the head with clinical workflow integration. NPJ Digital Med 2018;1:9 doi:10.1038/s41746-017-0015-z pmid:31304294

    CrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    1. Lee H,
    2. Yune S,
    3. Mansouri M, et al

    . An explainable deep-learning algorithm for the detection of acute intracranial haemorrhage from small datasets. Nat Biomed Eng 2019;3:173–82 doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0324-9 pmid:30948806

    CrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    1. Chang PD,
    2. Kuoy E,
    3. Grinband J, et al

    . Hybrid 3D/2D convolutional neural network for hemorrhage evaluation on head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1609–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5742 pmid:30049723

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
68. 68.↵
    1. Kuo W,
    2. Häne C,
    3. Mukherjee P, et al

    . Expert-level detection of acute intracranial hemorrhage on head computed tomography using deep learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019;116:22737–45 doi:10.1073/pnas.1908021116 pmid:31636195

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
69. 69.↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Xu H,
    3. Chen Q, et al

    . Prediction of hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using support vector machine. EBioMedicine 2019;43:454–59 doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.040 pmid:31060901

    CrossRefPubMed