Validation of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Spinal Cord Injury MRI Common Data Elements Instrument

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Grinnon ST,
   2. Miller K,
   3. Marler JR, et al

   . National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element Project—approach and methods. Clin Trials 2012;9:322–29 doi:10.1177/1740774512438980 pmid:22371630

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Sheehan J,
   2. Hirschfeld S,
   3. Foster E, et al

   . Improving the value of clinical research through the use of Common Data Elements. Clin Trials 2016;13:671–76 doi:10.1177/1740774516653238 pmid:27311638

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. NINDS Common Data Elements Database 2006, n.d. https://commondataelements.ninds.nih.gov
4. 4.↵
   1. Mulcahey MJ,
   2. Vogel LC,
   3. Sheikh M, et al

   . Recommendations for the National Institute for Neurologic Disorders and Stroke spinal cord injury common data elements for children and youth with SCI. Spinal Cord 2017;55:331–40 doi:10.1038/sc.2016.139 pmid:27845358

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Bauman WA,
   2. Wecht JM,
   3. Biering-Sørensen F

   . International spinal cord injury endocrine and metabolic extended data set. Spinal Cord 2017;55:466–77 doi:10.1038/sc.2016.164 pmid:28322240

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Biering-Sorensen F,
   2. Charlifue S,
   3. Devivo MJ, et al

   . Incorporation of the International Spinal Cord Injury Data Set elements into the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Elements. Spinal Cord 2011;49:60–64 doi:10.1038/sc.2010.90 pmid:20733589

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Biering-Sorensen F,
   2. Alai S,
   3. Anderson K, et al

   . Common data elements for spinal cord injury clinical research: a National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke project. Spinal Cord 2015;53:265–77 doi:10.1038/sc.2014.246 pmid:25665542

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Biering-Sorensen F,
   2. Charlifue S,
   3. Devivo MJ, et al

   . Using the spinal cord injury common data elements. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012;18:23–27 doi:10.1310/sci1801-23 pmid:22408366

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Flanders AE,
   2. Spettell CM,
   3. Tartaglino LM, et al

   . Forecasting motor recovery following cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging. Radiology 1996;201:649–55 doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939210 pmid:8939210

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Talbott JF,
    2. Whetstone WD,
    3. Readdy WJ, et al

    . The Brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings. J Neurosurg Spine 2015;23:495–504 doi:10.3171/2015.1.SPINE141033 pmid:26161519

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY

    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pmid:27330520

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Fehlings MG,
    2. Furlan JC,
    3. Massicotte EM, et al

    . Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of maximum canal compromise and spinal cord compression for evaluation of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1719–25 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000224164.43912.e6 pmid:16816769

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Furlan JC,
    2. Fehlings MG,
    3. Massicotte EM, et al

    . A quantitative and reproducible method to assess cord compression and canal stenosis after cervical spine trauma: a study of interrater and intrarater reliability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2083–91 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a91c pmid:17762809

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lurie JD,
    2. Tosteson ANA,
    3. Tosteson TD, et al

    . Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging readings for lumbar disc herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 2008;33:991–98 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8379 pmid:18427321

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Pfirrmann CWA,
    2. Dora C,
    3. Schmid MR, et al

    . MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology 2004;230:583–88 doi:10.1148/radiol.2302021289 pmid:14699183

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Schizas C,
    2. Theumann N,
    3. Burn A, et al

    . Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:1919–24 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd pmid:20671589

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science