Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleAdult Brain

Unraveling Deep Gray Matter Atrophy and Iron and Myelin Changes in Multiple Sclerosis

G. Pontillo, M. Petracca, S. Monti, M. Quarantelli, C. Criscuolo, R. Lanzillo, E. Tedeschi, A. Elefante, V. Brescia Morra, A. Brunetti, S. Cocozza and G. Palma
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2021, 42 (7) 1223-1230; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7093
G. Pontillo
aFrom the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (G.P., E.T., A.E., A.B., S.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Pontillo
M. Petracca
bNeurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences (M.P., C.C., R.L., V.B.M.), University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Petracca
S. Monti
cInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, (S.M., M.Q., G.P.) National Research Council, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Monti
M. Quarantelli
cInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, (S.M., M.Q., G.P.) National Research Council, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Quarantelli
C. Criscuolo
bNeurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences (M.P., C.C., R.L., V.B.M.), University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Criscuolo
R. Lanzillo
bNeurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences (M.P., C.C., R.L., V.B.M.), University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Lanzillo
E. Tedeschi
aFrom the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (G.P., E.T., A.E., A.B., S.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Tedeschi
A. Elefante
aFrom the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (G.P., E.T., A.E., A.B., S.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Elefante
V. Brescia Morra
bNeurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences (M.P., C.C., R.L., V.B.M.), University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V. Brescia Morra
A. Brunetti
aFrom the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (G.P., E.T., A.E., A.B., S.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Brunetti
S. Cocozza
aFrom the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (G.P., E.T., A.E., A.B., S.C.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Cocozza
G. Palma
cInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, (S.M., M.Q., G.P.) National Research Council, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Palma
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Modifications of magnetic susceptibility have been consistently demonstrated in the subcortical gray matter of MS patients, but some uncertainties remain concerning the underlying neurobiological processes and their clinical relevance. We applied quantitative susceptibility mapping and longitudinal relaxation rate relaxometry to clarify the relative contribution of atrophy and iron and myelin changes to deep gray matter damage and disability in MS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative susceptibility mapping and longitudinal relaxation rate maps were computed for 91 patients and 55 healthy controls from MR images acquired at 3T. Applying an external model, we estimated iron and myelin concentration maps for all subjects. Subsequently, changes of deep gray matter iron and myelin concentration (atrophy-dependent) and content (atrophy-independent) were investigated globally (bulk analysis) and regionally (voxel-based and atlas-based thalamic subnuclei analyses). The clinical impact of the observed MRI modifications was evaluated via regression models.

RESULTS: We identified reduced thalamic (P < .001) and increased pallidal (P < .001) mean iron concentrations in patients with MS versus controls. Global myelin and iron content in the basal ganglia did not differ between the two groups, while actual iron depletion was present in the thalamus (P < .001). Regionally, patients showed increased iron concentration in the basal ganglia (P ≤ .001) and reduced iron and myelin content in thalamic posterior-medial regions (P ≤ .004), particularly in the pulvinar (P ≤ .001). Disability was predicted by thalamic volume (B = –0.341, P = .02), iron concentration (B = -0.379, P =  .005) and content (B = –0.406, P = .009), as well as pulvinar iron (B = –0.415, P = .003) and myelin (B = −0.415, P = .02) content, independent of atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative MRI suggests an atrophy-related iron increase within the basal ganglia of patients with MS, along with an atrophy-independent reduction of thalamic iron and myelin correlating with disability. Absolute depletions of thalamic iron and myelin may represent sensitive markers of subcortical GM damage, which add to the clinical impact of thalamic atrophy in MS.

ABBREVIATIONS:

DD
disease duration
DGM
deep gray matter
EDSS
Expanded Disability Status Scale
HC
healthy controls
MNI
Montreal Neurological Institute
QSM
quantitative susceptibility mapping
R1
longitudinal relaxation rate
T2-LL
T2 lesion load

Along with atrophy,1 several pathologic variations have been demonstrated in the deep gray matter (DGM) of MS patients by means of advanced MRI techniques.2 Among these, recent quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) studies explored magnetic susceptibility alterations of subcortical GM,3⇓-5 because such changes might reflect iron accumulation and depletion, which play an important role in MS pathophysiology6 and seem to relate to motor and cognitive disability.4,5

Nonetheless, when drawing inferences on the relevance of DGM iron modifications in MS as measured by QSM, some considerations are needed. Indeed, brain magnetic susceptibility is also influenced by other molecules (primarily myelin, quantitatively assessable through the estimation of the longitudinal relaxation rate [R1]7,8) whose spatial distribution remarkably overlaps with iron patterns.9,10 Furthermore, susceptibility changes can differ across distinct subregions of DGM nuclei, which show intrinsic structural heterogeneity.11 Finally, the observed modifications may partially reflect atrophy-related epiphenomena rather than actual increases of iron load.12

Here we performed a multimodal (QSM and R1 relaxometry) investigation of DGM, computing in vivo iron- and myelin-specific maps to disentangle the contribution of atrophy and iron and myelin (concentration and content) abnormalities to subcortical GM damage in patients with MS at both global (bulk analysis) and regional (voxel-based and thalamic subnuclei ROI analyses) levels, simultaneously exploring their relationship with clinical disability.

We hypothesized that: 1) modifications of DGM iron and myelin in MS would be partially accounted for by the presence of atrophy; 2) subregional analyses would show a heterogeneous spatial distribution of iron and myelin changes; 3) these alterations would predict clinical disability independent of atrophy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

In this prospective cross-sectional study, from December 2013 to April 2015, we enrolled patients with MS diagnosed according to the 2010 McDonald criteria,13 along with age- and sex-comparable healthy controls (HC). Exclusion criteria were as follows: age below 18 or above 65 years; other pre-existing major systemic, psychiatric, or neurologic disorders; the presence of relapse and/or steroid treatment in the 30 days preceding MRI. Patients’ clinical disability was quantified using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score,14 while disease course was classified according to Lublin.15

Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents

The study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards, approved by the University of Naples “Federico II” Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

MRI Data Acquisition and Map Generation

All MRI examinations were performed on the same 3T scanner (Magnetom Trio; Siemens) and included a 3D T1-weighted sequence for volumetric analyses, a 3D T2-weighted FLAIR sequence for quantifying demyelinating lesion load (T2-LL), and two double-echo spoiled gradient-echo sequences for computing QSM and the R1 map. Details about sequence parameters are available in Online Supplemental Data, while a complete description of QSM and R1 map extraction procedures is available in previous works.16,17 Iron and myelin concentration maps were derived from QSM and the R1 map by inverting an external affine model estimated in a previous ex vivo MRI–pathology correlation study at 7T:9 Embedded Image

where MVF indicates the myelin volume fraction, and DW, dry weight.

The 3T R1 map was converted into an expected map at 7T according to Rooney et al,18 while susceptibility values were considered independent from field strength. To provide a common and biologically plausible range of values, we referenced iron and myelin concentration maps to mean ventricular CSF (automatically segmented on T1-weighted scans and assumed to correspond to zero concentrations) values averaged across all subjects.

Bulk, Voxel-Based, and Thalamic Subnuclei ROI Analyses

A detailed description of all MRI processing steps is available in the Online Supplemental Data, with a flow chart summarizing the pipeline depicted in the Online Supplemental Data.

Briefly, for the bulk analysis, demyelinating lesions were segmented on FLAIR images, and lesion masks were used to fill T1-weighted images. Then, basal ganglia structures (caudate nucleus, putamen, and globus pallidus) and the thalamus were segmented on filled T1-weighted anatomic scans using the FMRIB Integrated Registration and Segmentation Tool (FIRST; http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FIRST),19 with segmentation masks used to obtain volume and mean iron and myelin concentrations for each DGM structure. In addition, to obtain a measure intrinsically adjusted for the presence of atrophy, we computed iron mass and myelin mass as measures of total iron and myelin content, respectively, as described by Hernandez-Torres et al.12 Furthermore, as an ancillary analysis, the portion of MRI contrast attributable to iron or myelin was computed separately for each DGM structure based on the models in Stuber et al9 and the estimated iron and myelin values.

For the voxel-based analysis, we adapted a previously described pipeline.20 Briefly, QSM and R1 maps of all subjects were used to build study-specific multicontrast templates using ANTs (Version 2.3.1; http://stnava.github.io/ANTs).21 The study-specific QSM template was then coregistered to the reference QSM atlas in the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space,22 and the resulting transformations were used to bring each subject’s iron and myelin maps into the standard space. To take into account the effect of regional atrophy at the voxel level, we also computed modulated iron and myelin maps by scaling with the amount of volume changes due to spatial registration. Both modulated (reflecting local iron/myelin content) and unmodulated (reflecting local iron/myelin concentration) spatially normalized maps were smoothed with a 1-mm full width at half maximum isotropic Gaussian kernel before entering the statistical analysis.23

Finally, parallel to the voxelwise examination, subregional iron and myelin changes were also investigated with an ROI-based approach: thalamic subnuclei ROIs derived from the QSM atlas (ie, anterior, lateral, medial, midline nuclear groups; pulvinar; and internal medullary lamina)22 were warped in each subject’s native space to extract volume and iron and myelin values for each subregion.

Statistical Analysis

Unless otherwise specified, statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 25.0; IBM) with a significance level of α = .05, and the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was adopted for controlling the false discovery rate. Before running parametric analyses, we preliminarily verified linear model assumptions.

Between-group differences in terms of age and sex were evaluated using the Student t and Fisher exact tests, respectively. For the bulk analysis, modifications of each DGM structure volume, mean iron/myelin concentrations, and total iron/myelin content were assessed with age- and sex-corrected ANCOVA. A similar approach was replicated for the thalamic subnuclei ROI analysis.

For the voxel-based analysis, the FSL Randomise tool (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Randomise/UserGuide) was used to conduct between-group comparisons restricted to DGM: maps were fed into voxelwise cross-subject nonparametric analyses based on permutations, including age and sex as nuisance covariates, and controlling the family-wise error rate at the cluster level using the threshold-free cluster enhancement approach,23 with an extent threshold of κ = 100 voxels (0.1 mL) to avoid possible false-positive results due to minor registration errors.

When regional differences emerged, the corresponding first eigenvariate was extracted from the cluster and corrected for the effect of age and sex measured in HC. The relationship between the obtained z scores and EDSS, disease duration (DD), and disease course was assessed via correlation analyses. Similarly, adjusted z scores of other MRI features that were significantly altered at the between-group analyses were entered in preliminary correlation analyses.

Finally, the value as clinical disability predictors of MRI variables correlating with EDSS was tested with hierarchic linear regression analyses using bootstrap with 5000 resamples, including age- and sex-adjusted whole-brain normalized volume and T2-LL in the first block and adjusted z scores of individual MRI features in the second block. To test the ability of iron and myelin changes to predict disability independent of atrophy, we repeated the same regression analyses after including the volume of the corresponding DGM structure in the first block.

RESULTS

Subjects

Ninety-one patients with MS (71 with relapsing-remitting, with 20 progressive forms; 38.3 [SD, 11.1] years of age; male/female ratio = 37/54) were enrolled, along with 55 HC (41.6 [SD, 13.9] years of age; male/female ratio = 28/27). The mean DD for the whole cohort of patients was 11.2 (SD, 7.0) years, while the median EDSS score was 3.5 (interquartile range = 2.5–4.5). Eighty-three patients (91.2%) were under immunomodulatory treatment with either interferon-β-1a (23.1%), interferon-β-1b (11.0%), glatiramer acetate (3.3%), fingolimod (20.9%), teriflunomide (1.1%), or natalizumab (31.9%). Patients showed a mean T2-LL of 11.4  (SD, 13.3) mL and lower normalized GM, WM, and whole-brain volumes (all Ps < .001) compared with HC.

Demographic and clinical variables along with MRI–derived brain volumes of all subjects included in the study are reported in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Demographic, clinical, and conventional MRI characteristics of the studied populationa

Between-Group Comparisons Regarding DGM Structures

Patients showed significantly lower volumes of all DGM structures (all Ps < .001). In comparison with HC, the mean iron concentration was reduced in the thalamus (P < .001) and increased in the globus pallidus (P < .001), caudate nucleus (P = .02, not significant after false discovery rate correction) and putamen (P = .03, not significant after false discovery rate correction). When we looked at the total iron content, no significant difference emerged for any of the basal ganglia structures, while an actual iron depletion was found in the thalamus (P < .001). Regarding myelin, no significant between-group differences emerged in terms of mean concentration, while the global myelin content of all DGM structures was lower in patients compared with HC, even if this difference did not reach statistical significance.

Detailed results of the between-group bulk analysis are reported in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Results of the ANCOVA analyses for the between-group comparisons regarding DGM structuresa

As for the ancillary analysis, QSM was mainly influenced by iron concentration in the basal ganglia (contrast portion ≥ 91%), with a slightly lower iron dependence in the thalamus (88% of the contrast attributable to iron, 12% to myelin). R1 contrast was highly influenced by iron concentration in the globus pallidus (contrast portion = 92%), with progressively increasing myelin dependence in the putamen, caudate nucleus, and thalamus (58% of the contrast caused by myelin, 42% by iron) (Online Supplemental Data).

At the voxel-based analyses (Online Supplemental Data), clusters of increased iron concentration encompassing the bilateral basal ganglia emerged in patients compared with HC (P ≤ .001), with only small clusters of increased local iron content in the body of the caudate nucleus bilaterally (P ≤ .005) (Fig 1). Conversely, clusters of reduced iron concentration and local content emerged in the posterior and medial regions of the thalami (P ≤ .004) in patients compared with HC, along with a similar pattern of reduced local myelin content (P ≤ .004) (Figs 1 and 2).

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Image shows voxelwise analyses of iron maps. Clusters of significant between-group differences regarding unmodulated (top panel) and modulated (lower panel) iron maps for both the MS>HC (red-yellow, according to 1 - P value) and MS<HC (blue-light blue, according to 1 - P value) contrasts are presented, superimposed on the QSM template in the MNI space. Reprinted by permission from Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH: Springer Nature, Neuroradiology, European Society of Neuroradiology 2020, Copyright 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Image shows voxelwise analyses of myelin maps. Clusters of significant between-group difference regarding modulated myelin maps for the MS<HC (blue-light blue, according to 1 - P value) contrast are presented, superimposed on the QSM template in the MNI space. No significant differences emerged for the MS>HC contrast or for unmodulated myelin maps. Reprinted by permission from Springer Nature Customer Service Center GmbH: Springer Nature, Neuroradiology, European Society of Neuroradiology 2020, Copyright 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

In accordance with the results of the voxel-based investigation, the thalamic subnuclei ROI analysis of patients with MS compared with HC showed, along with significant atrophy of almost all subregions, reduced iron concentration and content in the pulvinar, midline, and medial nuclear groups and reduced myelin content in the pulvinar (Fig 3 and Online Supplemental Data).

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Between-group comparisons of MRI features regarding thalamic subnuclei. Boxplots at the y-axis show z scores (adjusted for the effect of age and sex in HC) of iron concentration and content (upper panel), myelin concentration and content (middle panel), and normalized volume (lower panel) of the corresponding thalamic subregions shown at the x-axis for both the MS and HC groups. Red asterisks mark significant between-group differences.

Relationship between DGM-Related MRI Features and Clinical Data

Results of the preliminary correlation analyses exploring the relationship between MRI variables and clinical data are reported in the Online Supplemental Data. Briefly, significant associations emerged between DGM volume and iron and myelin levels and disease duration and course (with higher DD and progressive course: increasing DGM atrophy and basal ganglia iron concentration and reduced iron concentration and iron and myelin content in the thalamus). When we explored the relationship between MRI metrics and the EDSS score, thalamic volume (B = −0.341, P = .02) and iron concentration (B = −0.379, P = .005) and content (B = −0.406, P = .009) significantly predicted clinical disability, with a specific role for reduced volume (B = −0.310, P = .03) and iron (B = −0.415, P = .003) and myelin (B = −0.415, P = .02) content in the pulvinar (Online Supplemental Data). When we included the volume of the corresponding DGM structure in the model, reduced iron and myelin levels in posteromedial subregions of the thalamus still provided additional value in the prediction of clinical disability (Online Supplemental Data).

DISCUSSION

In this study, the analysis of iron- and myelin-specific maps identified higher iron levels in the basal ganglia of patients with MS compared with HC, most likely reflecting atrophy-related condensation rather than iron accumulation, along with actual iron depletion and demyelination in subnuclei of the thalamus. Atrophy and reduction of thalamic iron and myelin content (particularly in the pulvinar) were all independently associated with higher clinical disability in patients with MS.

Direct (i.e. histopathology) and indirect (i.e. iron-sensitive MRI techniques)24 evidence of increased iron levels in the basal ganglia has been extensively documented in both healthy aging22,25 and CNS disease including MS,4,26 supposedly reflecting neurodegeneration.6 Increased iron concentration may generally be caused by an actual deposition of iron or by the removal of non-iron-containing tissue components, resulting in iron condensation. In our data, the observed discrepancy between the increased mean iron concentration in the basal ganglia of patients compared with HC and the similarity of iron content values among groups, along with the significant DGM volume loss observed in patients with MS, suggest an atrophy-related epiphenomenon rather than absolute iron accumulation, as already hypothesized.12 Nevertheless, higher iron levels could nurture a vicious circle contributing to neurodegeneration (and atrophy) through iron-related toxicity mechanisms.6

Conversely, we found reduced thalamic iron concentration, corresponding to an actual iron-depletion phenomenon. Discordant evidence exists regarding thalamic iron dynamics in MS, with reports of both increased3 and decreased11 levels. This inconsistency may relate to methodologic differences in addition to the unusual aging trajectory of thalamic iron concentration in HC, with an initial rise (peaking around 30 years) followed by a slow decrease at later ages.22,25 Indeed, recent QSM studies consistently demonstrated reduced thalamic iron in adult patients with MS compared with HC.2,4,11 Actually, the thalamus has a peculiar morphofunctional architecture, with more abundant WM fibers and iron-rich oligodendrocytes compared with the basal ganglia so that its changes in MS may rather resemble those of normal-appearing WM:27 chronic microglial activation may induce thalamic oligodendroglial damage and death, with subsequent iron depletion, reducing axonal protection and neuronal repair and eventually leading to neurodegeneration.6,11 Furthermore, its rich connectivity profile might make the thalamus particularly prone to secondary neurodegeneration effects from remote injury in other brain areas via deafferentation mechanisms, along with a neuroinflammatory microglial response spreading through corticothalamic tracts.11

When looking at myelin, between-group differences in terms of both mean concentration and global content were not statistically significant, in apparent contrast to the known occurrence of the demyelination phenomena in the DGM of patients with MS.26 Indeed, the simultaneous presence of volume shrinkage and demyelination in subcortical GM structures may leave myelin concentrations unaffected (or even paradoxically increased), while the relatively low (compared with iron) myelin content of DGM structures, along with its heterogeneous spatial distribution, may reduce the statistical power of the bulk analysis, as also suggested by the results of the subregional investigations.

Results of the ancillary analysis confirm that QSM contrast highly depends on iron levels in subcortical GM.3 Nevertheless, its combination with another quantitative MRI contrast (i.e. R1) may allow more specific mapping of tissue iron, especially in regions with higher myelin concentration (e.g. the thalamus). Furthermore, we showed how R1 contrast is strongly influenced by the high iron levels observed in DGM,18 so it may not be a valid myelin marker in subcortical GM as it is in WM7 or cortical GM.8 Thus, the combination of multiple quantitative MRI contrasts may ensure more specific characterization of the demyelination phenomena occurring in the DGM of patients with MS.26

Voxel-based and atlas-based ROI analyses indicated iron and myelin depletion in the posterior and medial subnuclei of the thalamus, with prominent involvement of the pulvinar, further advocating a central role for remote injury in driving thalamic damage. Indeed, the pulvinar is the largest of thalamic association areas, participating in a dense cortico-pulvinar-cortical circuitry subtending different brain functions,28 including the processing of visual information along visual pathways, which are known to be commonly involved in MS.29

When we explored the relationship with clinical data, along with atrophy, iron (increased concentration in the basal ganglia and reduced concentration and content in the thalamus) and myelin (reduced content in specific thalamic subregions) modifications were also associated with DD and a progressive course, supporting their role as disease-related neurodegeneration markers.

Furthermore, reductions of thalamic volume, iron and myelin content individually contributed to the prediction of the EDSS score in addition to conventional MRI markers of disease (i.e. whole-brain volume and T2-LL), once again confirming the clinical relevance of thalamic damage in the MS brain.2,4 Most interesting, when we included thalamic volume in the predictive models, measures of both global and subregional thalamic iron and myelin decrease still provided significant extra value in explaining disability. Hence, thalamic iron and myelin depletion might reflect partially atrophy-independent pathologic processes, possibly expressing changes in oligodendroglial and microglial compartments that precede and/or concur with volume loss, thus potentially representing sensitive and clinically relevant markers of subclinical inflammation.

Some limitations of this study should be acknowledged, partly related to iron/myelin estimation methods. First, the traditional myelin-iron model of MRI contrast may not be an accurate approximation of reality, particularly in the presence of other paramagnetic (e.g. gadolinium-based contrast agents30,31) or diamagnetic (e.g. calcium32) tissue components,10 which are known to potentially accumulate in DGM structures. Furthermore, neurobiologic inferences might be hindered by additional confounding factors related to the adoption of external parameters, including issues of parameter conversion across field strenghts18 and intrinsic limitations of ex vivo/in vivo results matching (e.g. fixation- and temperature-dependence of MRI signal). However, while our approach to iron and myelin estimation cannot be considered purely quantitative in nature, the obtained values fall in plausible ranges according to reference studies,25,27 supporting the validity of the proposed method for the pseudoquantitative evaluation of iron and myelin in clinical settings. Also, even if we were aware of the effect of iron concentration on T1 contrast and related automatic segmentations,18 we preferred adopting a robust and widely used method based solely on T1-weighted scans,19 thus keeping the volumetric quantification of DGM structures independent from the estimation of iron and myelin levels. Finally, longitudinal studies including extensive clinical and neuropsychological evaluations are encouraged to disentangle the causal relationship between iron and myelin modifications and atrophy in subcortical GM and to explore the potential of these metrics to outperform other established MRI measures of neurodegeneration (i.e. global/regional brain atrophy) as markers of disease progression and disability predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study sheds further light on iron and myelin modifications in the DGM of patients with MS, demonstrating an atrophy-related iron increase within the basal ganglia and a reduction of iron and myelin content within thalamic subnuclei, which correlates with clinical disability and may prove useful as a sensitive and partially atrophy-independent marker of subcortical GM damage.

Acknowledgments

Statistical analysis was conducted by Giuseppe Pontillo, MD, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University “Federico II,” Naples, Italy.

Footnotes

  • Paper previously presented, in part, at: Annual Meeting of the European Society of Neuroradiology, October 1–4, 2020; Virtual, Lisbon, Portugal.

  • The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

  • S. Cocozza and G. Palma share senior authorship.

  • Disclosures: Maria Petracca—UNRELATED: Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Ex-penses Unrelated to Activities Listed: Novartis. Roberta Lanzillo—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Roche; Consultancy: Merck, Biogen, Novartis, Roche; Expert Testimony: Biogen; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Roche, Biogen, Merck, Novartis; Payment for Development of Educational Presentations: Roche, Biogen, Merck, Novartis. Vincenzo Brescia Morra—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Novartis, Biogen, Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Almirall, Bayer AG, Merck. Sirio Cocozza—UNRELATED: Board Membership: Amicus Therapeutics; Payment for Lectures Including Service on Speakers Bureaus: Sanofi.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Eshaghi A,
    2. Prados F,
    3. Brownlee WJ, et al
    . MAGNIMS study group. Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2018;83:210–22 doi:10.1002/ana.25145 pmid:29331092
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pontillo G,
    2. Cocozza S,
    3. Lanzillo R, et al
    . Determinants of deep gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a multimodal MRI study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:99–106 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5915 pmid:30573464
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Langkammer C,
    2. Liu T,
    3. Khalil M, et al
    . Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2013;267:551–59 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120707 pmid:23315661
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zivadinov R,
    2. Tavazzi E,
    3. Bergsland N, et al
    . Brain iron at quantitative MRI is associated with disability in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 2018;289:487–96 doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180136 pmid:30015589
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fujiwara E,
    2. Kmech JA,
    3. Cobzas D, et al
    . Cognitive implications of deep gray matter iron in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:942–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5109 pmid:28232497
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Stephenson E,
    2. Nathoo N,
    3. Mahjoub Y, et al
    . Iron in multiple sclerosis: roles in neurodegeneration and repair. Nat Rev Neurol 2014;10:459–68 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.118 pmid:25002107
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. O’Muircheartaigh J,
    2. Vavasour I,
    3. Ljungberg E, et al
    . Quantitative neuroimaging measures of myelin in the healthy brain and in multiple sclerosis. Hum Brain Mapp 2019;40:2104–16 doi:10.1002/hbm.24510 pmid:30648315
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lutti A,
    2. Dick F,
    3. Sereno MI, et al
    . Using high-resolution quantitative mapping of R1 as an index of cortical myelination. Neuroimage 2014;93(Pt 2):176–88 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.005 pmid:23756203
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Stuber C,
    2. Morawski M,
    3. Schafer A, et al
    . Myelin and iron concentration in the human brain: a quantitative study of MRI contrast. Neuroimage 2014;93(Pt 1):95–106 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.026 pmid:24607447
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Moller HE,
    2. Bossoni L,
    3. Connor JR, et al
    . Iron, myelin, and the brain: neuroimaging meets neurobiology. Trends Neurosci 2019;42:384–401 doi:10.1016/j.tins.2019.03.009 pmid:31047721
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Schweser F,
    2. Raffaini Duarte Martins AL,
    3. Hagemeier J, et al
    . Mapping of thalamic magnetic susceptibility in multiple sclerosis indicates decreasing iron with disease duration: a proposed mechanistic relationship between inflammation and oligodendrocyte vitality. Neuroimage 2018;167:438–52 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.063 pmid:29097315
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hernandez-Torres E,
    2. Wiggermann V,
    3. Machan L, et al
    . Increased mean R2* in the deep gray matter of multiple sclerosis patients: have we been measuring atrophy? J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;50:201–08 doi:10.1002/jmri.26561 pmid:30511803
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Polman CH,
    2. Reingold SC,
    3. Banwell B, et al
    . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292–302 doi:10.1002/ana.22366 pmid:21387374
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kurtzke JF
    . Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52 doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 pmid:6685237
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lublin FD
    . New multiple sclerosis phenotypic classification. Eur Neurol 2014;72 Suppl 1:1–5 doi:10.1159/000367614 pmid:25278115
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Palma G,
    2. Tedeschi E,
    3. Borrelli P, et al
    . A novel multiparametric approach to 3D quantitative MRI of the brain. PLoS One 2015;10:e0134963 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134963 pmid:26284778
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Monti S,
    2. Borrelli P,
    3. Tedeschi E, et al
    . RESUME: turning an SWI acquisition into a fast qMRI protocol. PLoS One 2017;12:e0189933 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189933 pmid:29261786
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Rooney WD,
    2. Johnson G,
    3. Li X, et al
    . Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:308–18 doi:10.1002/mrm.21122 pmid:17260370
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Patenaude B,
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Kennedy DN, et al
    . A Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain segmentation. Neuroimage 2011;56:907–22 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.046 pmid:21352927
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hanspach J,
    2. Dwyer MG,
    3. Bergsland NP, et al
    . Methods for the computation of templates from quantitative magnetic susceptibility maps (QSM): toward improved atlas- and voxel-based analyses (VBA). J Magn Reson Imaging 2017;46:1474–84 doi:10.1002/jmri.25671 pmid:28263417
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Avants BB,
    2. Tustison NJ,
    3. Song G, et al
    . A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 2011;54:2033–44 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025 pmid:20851191
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Wei H,
    3. Cronin MJ, et al
    . Longitudinal atlas for normative human brain development and aging over the lifespan using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage 2018;171:176–89 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.008 pmid:29325780
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Nichols TE
    . Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009;44:83–98 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 pmid:18501637
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Stuber C,
    2. Pitt D,
    3. Wang Y
    . Iron in multiple sclerosis and its noninvasive imaging with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:100 doi:10.3390/ijms17010100 pmid:26784172
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hallgren B,
    2. Sourander P
    . The effect of age on the non-haemin iron in the human brain. J Neurochem 1958;3:41–51 doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1958.tb12607.x pmid:13611557
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Haider L,
    2. Simeonidou C,
    3. Steinberger G, et al
    . Multiple sclerosis deep grey matter: the relation between demyelination, neurodegeneration, inflammation and iron. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:1386–95 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2014-307712 pmid:24899728
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hametner S,
    2. Endmayr V,
    3. Deistung A, et al
    . The influence of brain iron and myelin on magnetic susceptibility and effective transverse relaxation: a biochemical and histological validation study. Neuroimage 2018;179:117–33 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.007 pmid:29890327
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Benarroch EE
    . Pulvinar: associative role in cortical function and clinical correlations. Neurology 2015;84:738–47 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001276 pmid:25609762
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Poretto V,
    2. Petracca M,
    3. Saiote C, et al
    . A composite measure to explore visual disability in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2017;3:2055217317709620 doi:10.1177/2055217317709620 pmid:28607759
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Cocozza S,
    2. Pontillo G,
    3. Lanzillo R, et al
    . MRI features suggestive of gadolinium retention do not correlate with Expanded Disability Status Scale worsening in multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 2019;61:155–62 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-02150-4 pmid:30617409
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Tedeschi E,
    2. Palma G,
    3. Canna A, et al
    . In vivo dentate nucleus MRI relaxometry correlates with previous administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Eur Radiol 2016;26:4577–84 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4245-2 pmid:26905870
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Harder SL,
    2. Hopp KM,
    3. Ward H, et al
    . Mineralization of the deep gray matter with age: a retrospective review with susceptibility-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:176–83 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0770 pmid:17989376
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 17, 2020.
  • Accepted after revision January 11, 2021.
  • © 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 42 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 42, Issue 7
1 Jul 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Unraveling Deep Gray Matter Atrophy and Iron and Myelin Changes in Multiple Sclerosis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
G. Pontillo, M. Petracca, S. Monti, M. Quarantelli, C. Criscuolo, R. Lanzillo, E. Tedeschi, A. Elefante, V. Brescia Morra, A. Brunetti, S. Cocozza, G. Palma
Unraveling Deep Gray Matter Atrophy and Iron and Myelin Changes in Multiple Sclerosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2021, 42 (7) 1223-1230; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7093

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Unraveling Deep Gray Matter Atrophy and Iron and Myelin Changes in Multiple Sclerosis
G. Pontillo, M. Petracca, S. Monti, M. Quarantelli, C. Criscuolo, R. Lanzillo, E. Tedeschi, A. Elefante, V. Brescia Morra, A. Brunetti, S. Cocozza, G. Palma
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2021, 42 (7) 1223-1230; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7093
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Molecular and micro-architectural mapping of gray matter alterations in psychosis
  • Quantitative MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: From Theory to Application
  • Crossref (36)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • χ-separation: Magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain
    Hyeong-Geol Shin, Jingu Lee, Young Hyun Yun, Seong Ho Yoo, Jinhee Jang, Se-Hong Oh, Yoonho Nam, Sehoon Jung, Sunhye Kim, Masaki Fukunaga, Woojun Kim, Hyung Jin Choi, Jongho Lee
    NeuroImage 2021 240
  • Cerebral Iron Deposition in Neurodegeneration
    Petr Dusek, Tim Hofer, Jan Alexander, Per M. Roos, Jan O. Aaseth
    Biomolecules 2022 12 5
  • Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro‐magnetic tissue properties study group
    Berkin Bilgic, Mauro Costagli, Kwok‐Shing Chan, Jeff Duyn, Christian Langkammer, Jongho Lee, Xu Li, Chunlei Liu, José P. Marques, Carlos Milovic, Simon Daniel Robinson, Ferdinand Schweser, Karin Shmueli, Pascal Spincemaille, Sina Straub, Peter van Zijl, Yi Wang
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2024 91 5
  • Clinical and neuroimaging findings in MOGAD–MRI and OCT
    Frederik Bartels, Angelo Lu, Frederike Cosima Oertel, Carsten Finke, Friedemann Paul, Claudia Chien
    Clinical and Experimental Immunology 2021 206 3
  • Neuroimaging Correlates of Cognitive Dysfunction in Adults with Multiple Sclerosis
    Maria Petracca, Giuseppe Pontillo, Marcello Moccia, Antonio Carotenuto, Sirio Cocozza, Roberta Lanzillo, Arturo Brunetti, Vincenzo Brescia Morra
    Brain Sciences 2021 11 3
  • Stratification of multiple sclerosis patients using unsupervised machine learning: a single-visit MRI-driven approach
    Giuseppe Pontillo, Simone Penna, Sirio Cocozza, Mario Quarantelli, Michela Gravina, Roberta Lanzillo, Stefano Marrone, Teresa Costabile, Matilde Inglese, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Daniele Riccio, Andrea Elefante, Maria Petracca, Carlo Sansone, Arturo Brunetti
    European Radiology 2022 32 8
  • Radiation Pneumonitis in Thoracic Cancer Patients: Multi-Center Voxel-Based Analysis
    Giuseppe Palma, Serena Monti, Roberto Pacelli, Zhongxing Liao, Joseph O. Deasy, Radhe Mohan, Laura Cella
    Cancers 2021 13 14
  • The ageing central nervous system in multiple sclerosis: the imaging perspective
    Massimo Filippi, Paolo Preziosa, Frederik Barkhof, Olga Ciccarelli, Andrea Cossarizza, Nicola De Stefano, Claudio Gasperini, Ruth Geraldes, Cristina Granziera, Lukas Haider, Hans Lassmann, Monica Margoni, Giuseppe Pontillo, Stefan Ropele, Àlex Rovira, Jaume Sastre-Garriga, Tarek A Yousry, Maria A Rocca
    Brain 2024 147 11
  • Clinical correlates of R1 relaxometry and magnetic susceptibility changes in multiple sclerosis: a multi-parameter quantitative MRI study of brain iron and myelin
    Giuseppe Pontillo, Maria Petracca, Serena Monti, Mario Quarantelli, Roberta Lanzillo, Teresa Costabile, Antonio Carotenuto, Fabio Tortora, Andrea Elefante, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Arturo Brunetti, Giuseppe Palma, Sirio Cocozza
    European Radiology 2022 33 3
  • Iron metabolism disorder and multiple sclerosis: a comprehensive analysis
    Chao Tang, Jiaxin Yang, Chaomin Zhu, Yaqi Ding, Sushuang Yang, Bingyang Xu, Dian He
    Frontiers in Immunology 2024 15

More in this TOC Section

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • ML for Glioma Molecular Subtype Prediction
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Functional

  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Brain Iron in Niemann-Pick Type C: 7T Study
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire