Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular
Open Access

Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Chronic Carotid Artery Occlusion on High-Resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging

M. Wan, L. Yan, Z. Xu, Z. Hou, K. Kang, R. Cui, Y. Yu, J. Song, F.K. Hui, Y. Wang, Z. Miao, X. Lou and N. Ma
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2022, 43 (1) 110-116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7365
M. Wan
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
fDepartment of Neurology (M.W.), Shijingshan Teaching Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Shijingshan Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Wan
L. Yan
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Yan
Z. Xu
dDepartment of Neurology (Z.X.), The First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Z. Xu
Z. Hou
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Z. Hou
K. Kang
bNeurology (K.K., Y.W.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Kang
R. Cui
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Cui
Y. Yu
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Yu
J. Song
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Song
F.K. Hui
gDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (F.K.H.), Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F.K. Hui
Y. Wang
bNeurology (K.K., Y.W.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Wang
Z. Miao
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Z. Miao
X. Lou
eDepartment of Radiology (X.L.), Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Lou
N. Ma
aFrom the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.)
cChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Ma
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic carotid artery occlusion remains a poorly understood risk factor for subsequent stroke, and potential revascularization is dependent on understanding the anatomy and nature of the occlusion. Luminal imaging cannot assess the nature of an occlusion, so the internal structure of the occlusion must be inferred. The present study examines the signal characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid occlusion that may point to management differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients who were diagnosed with chronic carotid artery occlusion defined as longer than 4 weeks and confirmed by DSA. All patients underwent high-resolution MR vessel wall imaging examinations after enrollment. Baseline characteristics, vessel wall imaging features, and DSA features were collected and evaluated. The vessel wall imaging features included segment involvement, signal intensity, contrast enhancement, and vessel wall thickness. The symptomatic and asymptomatic chronic carotid artery occlusions were compared.

RESULTS: A total of 44 patients with 48 lesions were included in this study from February 2020 to December 2020. Of the 48 lesions, 35 (72.9%) were symptomatic and 13 (27.1%) were asymptomatic. There was no difference in baseline and DSA features. On vessel wall imaging, C1 and C2 were the most commonly involved segments (91.7% and 68.8%, respectively). Compared with symptomatic lesions, asymptomatic lesions were more often isointense (69.2%) in the distal segment (P = .03). Both groups had diffuse wall thickening (80% and 100%).

CONCLUSIONS: Signal characteristics between those with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery occlusions differ in a statistically significant fashion, indicating a different structure of the occlusion.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CCAO
chronic carotid artery occlusion
VWI
vessel wall imaging

Chronic carotid artery occlusion (CCAO) accounts for 6.5% of ischemic strokes.1 CCAO may present as an incidental finding in asymptomatic patients, or it may present clinically as a TIA or a severe disabling stroke. The annual risk of TIA or ischemic stroke of asymptomatic CCAO is estimated to be between 2% and 8%.2⇓-4 The risk of stroke recurrence in symptomatic CCAO is 8% at 30 days, 10% at 1 year, and 14% at 5 years.5

CCAO may cause ischemic stroke due to an embolism from the occluded segment, compromised hemodynamics, and a mixture of both embolic and hemodynamic factors.6 The role of hemodynamics in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic CCAO has been demonstrated in previous studies.4,7 The biology and architecture of the occluded segment of a CCAO remain unclear. Conventional imaging modalities including CTA, MRA, ultrasonography, and DSA can evaluate the structural and hemodynamic functional information of nonoccluded vessels but cannot provide sufficient information about the features of vessel segments with no substantial flow. High-resolution MR vessel wall imaging (VWI) has been widely used in atherosclerotic diseases of the carotid and intracranial arteries.8⇓⇓-11 VWI can determine plaque size, intraplaque hemorrhage, large lipid core, and intraluminal thrombus and can evaluate dissection flaps and subintimal plaque.12 In addition, 3D VWI with variable flip angles can offer imaging with improved longitudinal coverage in a shorter imaging time.13,14 VWI has been reported to be practicable and accurate in the diagnosis of CCAO.15,16 VWI for CCAO can provide more information and direct visualization of the occluded segment, such as segment involvement, signal intensity, enhancement characteristics, and vessel wall thickness. However, few studies have focused on the characteristics of the occluded segment of CCAO on VWI.17 Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the differing imaging characteristics between symptomatic and asymptomatic CCAO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

This was a prospective study, approved by the institutional review board of the hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their representatives before enrollment. Patients admitted to the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and the Department of Neurology of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University who had been diagnosed with carotid artery occlusion by sonography, CTA, or MRA were selected. Carotid artery occlusion by sonography, CTA, or MRA was defined as 100% cross-sectional truncation of the vessel lumen. “Chronic” was defined as the patient having a carotid occlusion diagnosis for >4 weeks, confirmed by DSA, with TICI grade 0.18,19 All patients underwent DSA and VWI examinations after enrollment. The symptomatic CCAO group comprised patients who were admitted due to anterior ipsilateral ischemic events in the territory of the occluded vessel. The asymptomatic CCAO group was patients diagnosed with carotid artery occlusion incidentally during the course of routine clinical care. Ischemic events included ischemic stroke and TIA on the ipsilateral hemisphere or retinal artery. The exclusion criteria were the following: 1) contraindications to VWI or DSA examination; 2) near-occlusion or pseudo-occlusion confirmed by DSA; 3) intracranial chronic carotid artery occlusion; and 4) cardioembolic risk factors.

Data Collection

Baseline data including sex, age, body mass index, atherosclerotic risk factors, antithrombotic agents taken before and after diagnosis of CCAO, history of radiation, and time of the ischemic event onset were collected. Risk factors were defined as the following: hypertension defined as a history of hypertension or the patient taking any hypotensive drugs; diabetes mellitus defined as a history of diabetes mellitus, the patient taking any hypoglycemic agents, or a glycosylated hemoglobin level of  ≥7%; hyperlipidemia defined as a history of hyperlipidemia or receiving lipid-lowering treatment; and coronary artery disease defined as a history of myocardial infarction or angina pectoris. Smoking was defined as current smokers or a smoking history. VWI and DSA features were recorded. On VWI, features of segment involvement, signal intensity of the occluded segment, contrast enhancement, and vessel wall thickness were evaluated. On DSA, the imaging features of the vascular stump and the level of the distal reconstitution were also evaluated.

Vessel Wall Imaging

VWI was performed on a 3T Magnetom Trio MR imaging scanner (Siemens) or a 3T Discovery MR750 scanner (GE Healthcare) with a head/neck coil. The 3D T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences on the Magnetom Trio MR imaging scanner were obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE = 760/15 ms, section partial Fourier factor = 0.75, turbo factor = 60, echo spacing = 4.52 ms, parallel imaging acceleration = 3. The FOV was 240   × 220  × 172 mm (Foot-Head × Anterior-Posterior × Right-Left), and the voxel size was 0.54  × 0.54  × 0.54 mm. The 3D T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences on the Discovery MR750 were obtained with the following parameters: TR/TE =  675/21 ms, echo-train length = 24, echo spacing = 7.5 ms, bandwidth = 62.50 kHz, phase and HyperSense acceleration (GE Healthcare)  = 2, FOV = 180   × 180 mm (Superior-Inferior × Right-Left). The pixel size was 0.6  ×0.6 mm, and the section thickness was 0.8 mm. Other MR imaging scans included 3D TOF MRA, T2-weighted imaging, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Images were reconstructed using the Reformate tool in the Advantage Workstation 4.5 (GE Healthcare) or the D multiple planer reconstruction tool in the Siemens workstation.

DSA Imaging

All DSA studies were performed by 2 experienced interventional neuroradiologists with >10 years’ experience each. During angiography, the bilateral common carotid arteries and bilateral vertebral arteries received contrast injections in the anterior-posterior and lateral projections, respectively.

Imaging Analysis

All MR images were reviewed separately by a neuroradiologist with 6 years’ experience and a neurologist with 8 years’ experience who were blinded to clinical and medical information. A third reader was used to resolve disagreements in assessing the segment involvement. We divided each ICA into 7 segments (C1–C7) according to the classification of Bouthillier et al.20 To measure signal intensities, we placed ROIs at the occluded segment on the coronal T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences, with maximal size and adjacent sternomastoid muscle by the consensus decision of the 2 investigators. Signal intensity was categorized as hypointensity (less than the signal intensity of the adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle), isointensity (equal to that of the adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle), hyperintensity (more than that of the adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle), and heterogeneous intensity (a mix of the above).

The occluded segment was divided into the origin segment (origin of the ICA) and the distal segment (beyond the origin of the ICA) to assess the signal intensity separately. Contrast enhancement was determined by comparing pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images focused on the intraluminal thrombus. Vessel wall thickness was evaluated by T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences in the petrous ICA. The petrous ICA was divided into proximal, middle, and distal segments for measuring vessel wall thickness. Diffuse wall thickening was defined as a mean wall thickness of  >1.5 mm.21 Time intervals between the last ischemic event onset to VWI were divided into 4 stages (<7days, 7–30 days, 30–90 days, and ≥90 days). The difference in signal intensity across the 4 time points was evaluated.

DSA images were reviewed by the 2 operators. According to the contrast filling within the ICA from the common carotid artery and the shape, the morphology of the carotid stump was categorized as tapered, blunt, and no stump (Fig 1). The level of the distal collateral reconstitution was defined as the most proximal site visible at the distal end of the occlusion, divided into proximal or distal cavernous segments.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Stump condition: tapered stump (A), blunt stump (B), no stump (C)

Statistical Analysis

We performed statistical analysis using SPSS software, Version 20.0 (IBM). Normal distribution measurement data were expressed as mean (SD), while skew distribution data were expressed as median and interquartile range. Counting data were expressed in frequencies and percentages. We compared baseline data of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. DSA features and VWI features were compared between those with symptomatic and asymptomatic CCAO. The Student t test (normal distribution) or Mann-Whitney U test (skewed distribution) and the χ2 test or Fisher exact test were used according to the situation. P < .05 was considered a statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

Overall, a total of 44 patients with 48 lesions were included in this study from February 2020 to December 2020: 22 (50.0%) in Beijing Tiantan Hospital and 22 (50.0%) in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Of the 44 patients, 35 (79.5%) were symptomatic and 9 (20.5%) were asymptomatic. In symptomatic patients, 32 patients had ischemic stroke (29 ipsilateral hemispheres and 3 retinal arteries) and 3 patients had experienced TIA (1 ipsilateral hemisphere and 2 retinal arteries). One (2.0%) patient had a history of radiation. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1; there was no difference in baseline characteristics between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The time intervals between DSA and VWI were 1 day (interquartile range, 1–2.5 days) in the asymptomatic group and 2 days (interquartile range, 1–4 days) in the symptomatic group (P = .74).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Baseline data of patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic CCAO

Comparison between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic CCAO

DSA showed no difference in stump morphology and the level of distal collateral reconstitution between the 2 groups (Online Supplemental Data).

On VWI, C1 and C2 were the most commonly involved segments in both symptomatic CCAO (97.1% and 68.6%) and asymptomatic CCAO (76.9% and 69.2%). Two patterns of signal intensity were detected in the origin segment (isointensity and heterogeneous intensity). There were 7 (20.0%) instances of isointensity and 27 (77.1%) of heterogeneous intensity in symptomatic CCAO (Fig 2). There were 5 (38.5%) instances of isointensity and 5 (38.5%) of heterogeneous intensity in those with asymptomatic CCAO (P = .15). Three patterns of signal intensity were detected in the distal segment (hyperintensity, isointensity, and heterogeneous intensity). There was a higher prevalence of isointensity (69.2%) in the asymptomatic CCAO compared with the symptomatic CCAO (P = .03) group. There were 14 patients (15 lesions) with contrast-enhanced scans. Nine scans in 13 patients with symptomatic CCAO were demonstrated to be contrast-enhanced, as well as 2 scans in 2 patients with asymptomatic CCAO (P = .95). Both patients with symptomatic, and asymptomatic CCAO had a high prevalence of diffuse thickening of the vessel wall (80% and 100% respectively).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

An adult man who presented with blurred vision for 1 month and right-limb weakness for 10 days. On DSA, the occluded segment is from C1 (B) to C6 (A). On VWI, 3D T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences show that the occluded segment is C1 (arrow) to C6 (arrow) (C). The signal intensity of the distal segment in a elliptical region-of-interest (ROI) (D), and the signal intensity of the origin segment is heterogeneous intensity in a elliptical ROI (E).

Difference in Signal Intensity at Different Stages of Symptomatic CCAO

In symptomatic CCAO, both the origin segment and distal segment showed no difference at the following 4 stages: <7 days, 7–30 days, 30–90 days, and ≥90 days (Tables 2 and 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Difference in signal intensity at the origin segment of symptomatic CCAO at different stages

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Difference in signal intensity at the distal segment of symptomatic CCAO at different stages

Comparison of DSA with VWI

The accuracy of VWI for the diagnosis of total CCAO was 100%. The level of occlusion differed between DSA and VWI, with a consistency rate of 27.1%. Most of the lesions were shown to be shorter on VWI than DSA, and a tiny lumen could be seen beyond the occluded segment on VWI but was considered occluded on DSA (Fig 3).

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

An adult woman who presented with dizziness for 2 months. On DSA, the occluded segment is from C1 (B) to C7 (A). On VWI, 3D T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences show that the occluded segment was C2 (arrow) to C4 (arrow), and C1 did not have total occlusion (arrowheads, C). The signal intensity of distal segment is isointensity in a elliptical region-of-interest (ROI) (D). The origin segment showed a tiny lumen (arrowhead), in a circular ROI which was considered an occluded segment on DSA (E).

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates that asymptomatic CCAO lesions have a higher prevalence of isointensity compared with symptomatic CCAO lesions. The most common occluded segments in CCAO lesions were C1 and C2. Most of the CCAO lesions had diffuse thickening of the vessel wall on VWI, so VWI may provide detailed characterization of the occlusion for patients with CCAO.

VWI for the diagnosis of CCAO has been reported to have high accuracy and sensitivity using DSA as a reference.15,22,23 A few studies have focused on the signal intensity of the occluded segment of the CCAO. Previous studies have reported a higher prevalence of heterogeneous intensity at the beginning of the occluded segment and a 47.5% presence of high signal intensity in the occluded segment.15,17 Atherosclerosis is the major cause (about 70%) of CCAO, and most lesions are located at the origin of the ICA.24 The deterioration of the atherosclerotic plaque leads to occlusion of the carotid artery and formation of the intraluminal thrombus within the distal segment. The signal intensities of the origin and distal segments are usually different. It is difficult to describe the whole occluded segment with uniform signal intensity. In this study, we divided the occluded segment into 2 parts to evaluate the signal intensity: the origin segment (the origin of the ICA) and the distal segment (distal C1 and above). Heterogeneous signal intensity was frequently encountered in the origin segment, but there was no difference between the 2 groups. The most common signal intensity in the distal segment was isointensity in asymptomatic lesions, which was not the case in symptomatic lesions (P = .03).

Cerebral hemorrhage can be chronologically divided into different stages by MR imaging: hyperacute, acute, early subacute, late subacute, and chronic stage.25,26 Intraplaque hemorrhage of atherosclerosis on high-resolution MR imaging is also chronologically divided into fresh, recent, and old stages.27 We proposed that the signal intensity of the distal segment may vary with time, similar to the signal intensity of cerebral hemorrhage and intraplaque hemorrhage. We selected different time intervals from the last onset of symptoms to the VWI examination in reference to cerebral hemorrhage and intraplaque hemorrhage. However, there was no difference in signal intensity at different time points. The same phenomenon has been observed in studies about intracranial large-vessel arterial occlusion.28 The reason may be that the exact time of the CCAO is uncertain and there is spontaneous recanalization and reformation of the thrombus in the occluded segment.

In this study, all the lesions in the asymptomatic group and 80% in the symptomatic group had a diffuse thickening of the vessel wall. In a previous study, diffuse wall thickening in the petrous ICA was correlated with proximal ICA steno-occlusive disease.29 With the increasing degree of stenosis, diffuse wall thickening became severe (present in 1.4%, 5.3%, 5.9%, and 80.4% of ipsilateral proximal ICAs, respectively, in patients with stenosis of 1%–49%, 50%–69%, 70%–99%, and total occlusion, respectively).29 The probable cause is edema of the vessel wall due to long-term ischemia. Nutrients of the intima and inner media are supplied by diffusion from the lumen, and the adventitia is supplied by the vasa vasorum.30 The vasa vasorum often arose directly from the lumen of the carotid artery and the arterial branching points.31 When the carotid artery was occluded, the vessel wall lost its nutrient supply and edema occurred.

DSA remains the criterion standard for the diagnosis of vascular disease; it can evaluate structural and hemodynamic functional information but cannot provide information on the vessel wall. VWI has been widely used in atherosclerosis of the carotid artery for its sufficient black-blood effects, excellent scan efficiency, high isotropic resolution and signal-to-noise ratio, and large spatial coverage.32,33 Compared with DSA, VWI can provide more information about the occluded segment. In this study, 72.9% of occluded segments detected by VWI were shorter than those detected by DSA. A previous study also found a similar result.16 The tiny lumen can be observed beyond the occluded segment on VWI, but it was considered occluded on DSA. We hypothesize that this was a pseudo-occlusion caused by collapse of the vessel wall due to inadequate compensatory proximal and distal blood flow. Endovascular interventional therapy has become a major treatment for CCAO. The stump condition and distal ICA reconstitution on DSA are important factors affecting successful recanalization.34 It is necessary to identify the true occluded segment, and VWI may provide more information to help improve the success rate of recanalization.16

There were some limitations of this study. First, the MR imaging scanner was different in the 2 centers. Second, 3D T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences were used to evaluate occluded segments without additional flow suppression, possibly affecting the evaluation of slow blood flow in the proximal-to-distal occluded segments. Third, 9 patients included in the asymptomatic group were detected occasionally, so selection bias may exist. Due to the small sample size, the findings in the present study need to be interpreted with caution. Fourth, only a portion of patients underwent enhanced scans, possibly not fully demonstrating the characteristics of the occluded segment. Finally, the conclusion of this study needs to be confirmed by a larger amount of data research in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

VWI can provide further insight into the occluded segment of CCAO. The signal intensity was demonstrated to be different between symptomatic and asymptomatic CCAO.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by Beijing Yangfan Plan, XMLX201844, National Natural Science Foundation of China, 81730048, 81825012.

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

  • Min Wan, Long Yan, and Ziqi Xu contributed equally to this article.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Weimar C,
    2. Goertler M,
    3. Harms L, et al
    . Distribution and outcome of symptomatic stenoses and occlusions in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Arch Neurol 2006;63:1287–91 doi:10.1001/archneur.63.9.1287 pmid:16966507
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Lall A,
    2. Yavagal DR,
    3. Bornak A
    . Chronic total occlusion and spontaneous recanalization of the internal carotid artery: natural history and management strategy. Vascular 2021;29:733–41 doi:10.1177/1708538120978043 pmid:3329787
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hackam DG
    . Prognosis of asymptomatic carotid artery occlusion: systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2016;47:1253–57 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012760 pmid:27073237
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Fritsch SM, et al
    . Benign prognosis of never-symptomatic carotid occlusion. Neurology 2000;54:878–82 doi:10.1212/WNL.54.4.878 pmid:10690980
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Flaherty ML,
    2. Flemming KD,
    3. McClelland R, et al
    . Population-based study of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion: incidence and long-term follow-up. Stroke 2004;35:e349–52 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000135024.54608.3f pmid:15232124
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Thanvi B,
    2. Robinson T
    . Complete occlusion of extracranial internal carotid artery: clinical features, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:95–99 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2006.048041 pmid:17308211
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gupta A,
    2. Chazen JL,
    3. Hartman M, et al
    . Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2012;43:2884–91 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663716 pmid:23091119
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Underhill HR,
    2. Hatsukami TS,
    3. Cai J, et al
    . A noninvasive imaging approach to assess plaque severity: the carotid atherosclerosis score. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1068–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2007 pmid:20093315
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Takaya N,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Chu B, et al
    . Presence of intraplaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation 2005;111:2768–75 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.504167 pmid:15911695
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. de Havenon A,
    2. Mossa-Basha M,
    3. Shah L, et al
    . High-resolution vessel wall MRI for the evaluation of intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1193–1202 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1925-9 pmid:28942481
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Dieleman N,
    2. Yang W,
    3. Abrigo JM, et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging of plaque morphology, burden, and distribution in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke 2016;47:1797–1802 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013007 pmid:27301944
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hui FK,
    2. Zhu X,
    3. Jones SE, et al
    . Early experience in high-resolution MRI for large vessel occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:509–16 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011142 pmid:24827065
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Murata K,
    2. Murata N,
    3. Chu BC, et al
    ; CARE-II Study Collaborators. Characterization of carotid atherosclerotic plaques using 3-dimensional MERGE magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with stroke risk factors. Stroke 2020;51:475–80 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027779 pmid:31902332
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Narumi S,
    2. Sasaki M,
    3. Natori T, et al
    . Carotid plaque characterization using 3DT1-weighted MR imaging with histopathologic validation: a comparison with 2D technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:751–56 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4197 pmid:25572946
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Ding S,
    3. Zhao H, et al
    . Evaluation of chronic carotid artery occlusion by non-contrast 3D-MERGE MR vessel wall imaging: comparison with 3D-TOF-MRA, contrast-enhanced MRA, and DSA. Eur Radiol 2020;30:5805–14 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06989-1 pmid:32529567
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Chai S,
    2. Sheng Z,
    3. Xie W, et al
    . Assessment of apparent internal carotid tandem occlusion on high-resolution vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:693–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6452 pmid:32115423
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Zhou J,
    2. Cai SF,
    3. Yuan XS, et al
    . Remodeling of occluded internal carotid artery in vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Neurosci 2020 Nov 18. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1080/00207454.2020.1847105 pmid:33153335
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yang Y,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Wang R, et al
    . A treatment option for symptomatic chronic complete internal carotid artery occlusion: hybrid surgery. Front Neurosci 2020;14:392 doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00392 pmid:32410953
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Nguyen-Huynh MN,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Rordorf G
    . Spontaneous recanalization of internal carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 2003;34:1032–34 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000060872.85874.33 pmid:12637693
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bouthillier A,
    2. van Loveren HR,
    3. Keller JT
    . Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 1996;38:425–32; discussion 432–33 doi:10.1097/00006123-199603000-00001 pmid:8837792
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Liu Y, et al
    . Proximal internal carotid artery stenosis associates with diffuse wall thickening in petrous arterial segment of Moyamoya disease patients: a three-dimensional magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging study. Neuroradiology 2019;61:29–36 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-2124-z pmid:30402746
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Zhao HL,
    2. Wang JN,
    3. Liu XS, et al
    . Assessment of carotid artery atherosclerotic disease by using three-dimensional fast black-blood MR imaging: comparison with DSA. Radiology 2015;274:508–16 doi:10.1148/radiol.14132687 pmid:25286322
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wang Z,
    2. Lu M,
    3. Liu W, et al
    . Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020;22:18 doi:10.1186/s12968-020-0604-x pmid:32131854
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Paraskevas KI,
    2. Mikhailidis DP,
    3. Liapis CD
    . Internal carotid artery occlusion: association with atherosclerotic disease in other arterial beds and vascular risk factors. Angiology 2007;58:329–35 doi:10.1177/0003319707301754 pmid:17626988
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Gomori JM,
    2. Grossman RI,
    3. Hackney DB, et al
    . Variable appearances of subacute intracranial hematomas on high-field spin-echo MR. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:171–78 doi:10.2214/ajr.150.1.171 pmid:3257117
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Gomori JM,
    2. Grossman RI,
    3. Goldberg HI, et al
    . Intracranial hematomas: imaging by high-field MR. Radiology 1985;157:87–93 doi:10.1148/radiology.157.1.4034983 pmid:4034983
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Chu B,
    2. Kampschulte A,
    3. Ferguson MS, et al
    . Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke 2004;35:1079–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000125856.25309.86 pmid:15060318
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Al-Smadi AS,
    2. Abdalla RN,
    3. Elmokadem AH, et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution black-blood MRI in the evaluation of intracranial large-vessel arterial occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:954–59 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6065 pmid:31072969
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Zhao H,
    3. Chen Z, et al
    . Association between proximal internal carotid artery steno-occlusive disease and diffuse wall thickening in its petrous segment: a magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging study. Neuroradiology 2017;59:485–90 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1825-z pmid:28357461
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Bo WJ,
    2. McKinney WM,
    3. Bowden RL
    . The origin and distribution of vasa vasorum at the bifurcation of the common carotid artery with atherosclerosis. Stroke 1989;20:1484–87 doi:10.1161/01.str.20.11.1484 pmid:2815182
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Barker SG,
    2. Causton BE,
    3. Baskerville PA, et al
    . The vasa vasorum of the rabbit carotid artery. J Anat 1992;180:(Pt 2):225–31 pmid:1506278
    PubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Xie YB,
    2. Yang Q,
    3. Xie GX, et al
    . Improved black-blood imaging using DANTE-SPACE for simultaneous carotid and intracranial vessel wall evaluation. Magn Reson Med 2016;75:2286–94 doi:10.1002/mrm.25785 pmid:26152900
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Fan ZY,
    2. Zuehlsdorff S,
    3. Liu X, et al
    . Prospective self-gating for swallowing motion: A feasibility study in carotid artery wall MRI using three-dimensional variable-flip-angle turbo spin-echo. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:490–98 doi:10.1002/mrm.23295 pmid:22161627
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Chen YH,
    2. Leong WS,
    3. Lin MS, et al
    . Predictors for successful endovascular intervention in chronic carotid artery total occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:1825–32 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.015 pmid:27609258
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received May 31, 2021.
  • Accepted after revision September 28, 2021.
  • © 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 43 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 43, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Chronic Carotid Artery Occlusion on High-Resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. Wan, L. Yan, Z. Xu, Z. Hou, K. Kang, R. Cui, Y. Yu, J. Song, F.K. Hui, Y. Wang, Z. Miao, X. Lou, N. Ma
Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Chronic Carotid Artery Occlusion on High-Resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2022, 43 (1) 110-116; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7365

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Chronic Carotid Artery Occlusion on High-Resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging
M. Wan, L. Yan, Z. Xu, Z. Hou, K. Kang, R. Cui, Y. Yu, J. Song, F.K. Hui, Y. Wang, Z. Miao, X. Lou, N. Ma
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2022, 43 (1) 110-116; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7365
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Vessel wall MRI evaluation for the safety of endovascular recanalization of non-acute intracranial anterior circulation artery occlusions
  • Crossref (7)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology
    Yasutaka Fushimi, Kazumichi Yoshida, Masakazu Okawa, Takakuni Maki, Satoshi Nakajima, Akihiko Sakata, Sachi Okuchi, Takuya Hinoda, Mitsunori Kanagaki, Yuji Nakamoto
    La radiologia medica 2022 127 9
  • Real-Time 2D/3D Registration via CNN Regression and Centroid Alignment
    De-Xing Huang, Xiao-Hu Zhou, Xiao-Liang Xie, Shi-Qi Liu, Zhen-Qiu Feng, Zeng-Guang Hou, Ning Ma, Long Yan
    IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 2025 22
  • Prognostic Value of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Chronic Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion Complicated by Cerebral Infarction
    Zhuoyin Qiu, Tingting Guo, Xihua Sheng, Ying Tang, Huaping Du
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2022 Volume 18
  • The diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis
    Robert J. Henning, Brian L. Hoh
    Current Problems in Cardiology 2025 50 6
  • Symptomatische und asymptomatische Karotisokklusionen in der Gefäß-MRT
    Radiologie up2date 2023 23 03
  • Symptomatische und asymptomatische Karotisokklusionen in der Gefäß-MRT
    Neuroradiologie Scan 2022 12 04
  • Vessel wall MRI evaluation for the safety of endovascular recanalization of non-acute intracranial anterior circulation artery occlusions
    Yao Meng, Yun Yang, Miyengi Cosmas Magigi, Weili Li, Yun Song, Wei Zhao, Meimei Zheng, Lili Sun, Hao Yin, Wei Wang, Xiao He, Jun Zhang, Ju Han
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2025 17 e2

More in this TOC Section

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire