Assessment of Heating on Titanium Alloy Cerebral Aneurysm Clips during 7T MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Gönner F,
   2. Lövblad KO,
   3. Heid O, et al

   . Magnetic resonance angiography with ultrashort echo times reduces the artefact of aneurysm clips. Neuroradiology 2002;44:755–58 doi:10.1007/s00234-002-0825-8 pmid:12221447

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Grandin CB,
   2. Cosnard G,
   3. Hammer F, et al

   . Vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: diagnosis with MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1611–17 pmid:11039339

   PubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Leclerc X,
   2. Fichten A,
   3. Gauvrit JY, et al

   . Symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage: assessment of brain damage by diffusion and perfusion-weighted MRI and single-photon emission computed tomography. Neuroradiology 2002;44:610–16 doi:10.1007/s00234-002-0745-7 pmid:12136364

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Villain A,
   2. Boulouis G,
   3. Ben Hassen W, et al

   . Small-vessel disease in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: prevalence and associations with vasospasm occurrence, severity and clinical outcomes. Neuroradiol J 2019;32:438–44 doi:10.1177/1971400919877470 pmid:31566526

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Kollia K,
   2. Maderwald S,
   3. Putzki N, et al

   . First clinical study on ultra-high-field MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis: comparison of 1.5T and 7T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:699–702 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1434 pmid:19147714

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fujimoto K,
   2. Uwano I,
   3. Sasaki M, et al

   . Acetazolamide-loaded dynamic 7T MR quantitative susceptibility mapping in major cerebral artery steno-occlusive disease: comparison with PET. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:785–91 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6508 pmid:32299799

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Sato Y,
   2. Ogasawara K,
   3. Yoshida K, et al

   . Preoperative visualization of the marginal tentorial artery as an unusual collateral pathway in a patient with symptomatic bilateral vertebral artery occlusion undergoing arterial bypass surgery: a 7.0-T magnetic resonance imaging study. Surg Neurol Int 2014;5:157 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.143760 pmid:25422785

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Matsushige T,
   2. Kraemer M,
   3. Schlamann M, et al

   . Ventricular microaneurysms in Moyamoya angiopathy visualized with 7T MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1669–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4786 pmid:27151748

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Wrede KH,
   2. Matsushige T,
   3. Goericke SL, et al

   . Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 7 Tesla: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2017;27:354–64 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4323-5 pmid:26993650

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. von Morze C,
    2. Xu D,
    3. Purcell DD, et al

    . Intracranial time-of-flight MR angiography at 7T with comparison to 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:900–04 doi:10.1002/jmri.21097 pmid:17896360

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Conijn MM,
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. Zwanenburg JJ, et al

    . Perforating arteries originating from the posterior communicating artery: a 7.0-Tesla MRI study. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2986–92 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1485-4 pmid:19533146

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Wrede KH,
    2. Dammann P,
    3. Monninghoff C, et al

    . Non-enhanced MR imaging of cerebral aneurysms: 7 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla. PLoS One 2014;9:e84562 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084562 pmid:24400100

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. De Cocker LJ,
    2. Lindenholz A,
    3. Zwanenburg JJ, et al

    . Clinical vascular imaging in the brain at 7T. Neuroimage 2018;168:452–58 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.044 pmid:27867089

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Dula AN,
    2. Virostko J,
    3. Shellock FG

    . Assessment of MRI issues at 7T for 28 implants and other objects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:401–05 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.10777 pmid:24450683

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Noureddine Y,
    2. Kraff O,
    3. Ladd ME, et al

    . In vitro and in silico assessment of RF-induced heating around intracranial aneurysm clips at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:568–81 doi:10.1002/mrm.26650 pmid:28266079

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Kangarlu A,
    2. Shellock FG

    . Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions with an 8.0 T MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:107–11 doi:10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<107::AID-JMRI12>3.0.CO;2-5 pmid:10931570

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    International Electrotechnical Commission. Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis international standard IEC 60601 medical electrical equipment. 2015; Part 2–33. https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/22705. Accessed April 30, 2022
18. 18.↵
    1. Noureddine Y,
    2. Kraff O,
    3. Ladd ME, et al

    . Radiofrequency induced heating around aneurysm clips using a generic birdcage head coil at 7 Tesla under consideration of the minimum distance to decouple multiple aneurysm clips. Magn Reson Med 2019;82:1859–75 doi:10.1002/mrm.27835 pmid:31199013

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International: F2182-19e2. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Radio Frequency Induced Heating On or Near Passive Implants During Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2019. https://www.astm.org/f2182-19e02.html. Accessed April 30, 2022
20. 20.↵
    1. Boutet A,
    2. Elias GJB,
    3. Gramer R, et al

    . Safety assessment of spine MRI in deep brain stimulation patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2020 Feb 4. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2019.12.SPINE191241 pmid:32059193

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Yarnykh VL

    . Actual flip-angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: a method for rapid three-dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:192–20 doi:10.1002/mrm.21120 pmid:17191242

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). Char-acterization of the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems. 2016. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/10166401/NEMA%20MS%208. Accessed April 30, 2022
23. 23.↵
    1. Shellock FG

    . Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:30–36 doi:10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<30::AID-JMRI4>3.0.CO;2-S pmid:10931562

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Collins CM,
    2. Smith MB

    . Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of “90 degrees:” RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:684–91 doi:10.1002/mrm.1091 pmid:11283997

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Ladd ME

    . High-field-strength magnetic resonance: potential and limits. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007;18:139–52 doi:10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180f612b3 pmid:17621228

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Schmitz BL,
    2. Aschoff AJ,
    3. Hoffmann MH, et al

    . Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2229–37 pmid:16219827

    PubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Baker KB,
    2. Tkach JA,
    3. Nyenhuis JA, et al

    . Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI-related implant heating. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:315–20 doi:10.1002/jmri.20103 pmid:15269959

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Fagan AJ,
    2. Amrami KK,
    3. Welker KM, et al

    . Magnetic resonance safety in the 7T environment. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2020;28:573–82 doi:10.1016/j.mric.2020.07.002 pmid:33040997

    CrossRefPubMed