Identification of the Language Network from Resting-State fMRI in Patients with Brain Tumors: How Accurate Are Experts?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Barkhof F,
   2. Haller S,
   3. Rombouts SA

   . Resting-state functional MR imaging: a new window to the brain. Radiology 2014;272:29–49 doi:10.1148/radiol.14132388 pmid:24956047

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Airan RD,
   2. Vogelstein JT,
   3. Pillai JJ, et al

   . Factors affecting characterization and localization of interindividual differences in functional connectivity using MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2016;37:1986–97 doi:10.1002/hbm.23150 pmid:27012314

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Lee MH,
   2. Miller-Thomas MM,
   3. Benzinger TL, et al

   . Clinical resting-state fMRI in the preoperative setting: are we ready for prime time? Top Magn Reson Imaging 2016;25:11–18 doi:10.1097/RMR.0000000000000075 pmid:26848556

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Qiu T,
   2. Yan C,
   3. Tang W, et al

   . Localizing hand motor area using resting-state fMRI: validated with direct cortical stimulation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:2295–302 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2236-0 pmid:25246146

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Tie Y,
   2. Rigolo L,
   3. Norton IH, et al

   . Defining language networks from resting state fMRI for surgical planning: a feasibility study. Hum Brain Mapp 2014;35:1018–30 doi:10.1002/hbm.22231 pmid:23288627

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Sair HI,
   2. Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi N,
   3. Calhoun VD, et al

   . Presurgical brain mapping of the language network in patients with brain tumors using resting-state fMRI: comparison with task fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2016;37:913–23 doi:10.1002/hbm.23075 pmid:26663615

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Cochereau J,
   2. Deverdun J,
   3. Herbet G, et al

   . Comparison between resting state fMRI networks and responsive cortical stimulations in glioma patients. Hum Brain Mapp 2016;37:3721–32 doi:10.1002/hbm.23270 pmid:27246771

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Sanai N,
   2. Mirzadeh Z,
   3. Berger MS

   . Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection. N Engl J Med 2008;358:18–27 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa067819 pmid:18172171

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Corbetta M,
   2. Patel G,
   3. Shulman GL

   . The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 2008;58:306–24 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017 pmid:18466742

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Oldfield RC

    . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113 doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 pmid:5146491

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Mazaika P,
    2. Hoeft F,
    3. Glover G, et al

    . Methods and software for fMRI analysis of clinical subjects. Neuroimage 2009;47:S58 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70238-1

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    1. Behzadi Y,
    2. Restom K,
    3. Liau J, et al

    . A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 2007;37:90–101 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042 pmid:17560126

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Himberg J,
    2. Hyvärinen A,
    3. Esposito F, et al

    . Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization. Neuroimage 2004;22:1214–22 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.027 pmid:15219593

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Hsu A,
    2. Chen HS,
    3. Hou P, et al

    . Presurgical resting-state functional MRI language mapping with seed selection guided by regional homogeneity. Magn Reson Med 2020;84:375–83 doi:10.1002/mrm.28107 pmid:31793025

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Leuthardt EC,
    2. Allen M,
    3. Kamran M, et al

    . Resting-state blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI: a paradigm shift in preoperative brain mapping. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2015;93:427–39 doi:10.1159/000442424 pmid:26784290

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Leuthardt EC,
    2. Guzman G,
    3. Bandt SK, et al

    . Integration of resting state functional MRI into clinical practice: a large single institution experience. PLoS One 2018;13:e0198349 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198349 pmid:29933375

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Southwell DG,
    2. Hervey-Jumper SL,
    3. Perry DW, et al

    . Intraoperative mapping during repeat awake craniotomy reveals the functional plasticity of adult cortex. J Neurosurg 2016;124:1460–69 doi:10.3171/2015.5.JNS142833 pmid:26544767

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Wang N,
    2. Zeng W,
    3. Chen L

    . SACICA: a sparse approximation coefficient-based ICA model for functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2013;216:49–61 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.03.014 pmid:23563324

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Agarwal S,
    2. Sair HI,
    3. Airan R, et al

    . Demonstration of brain tumor-induced neurovascular uncoupling in resting-state fMRI at ultrahigh field. Brain Connect 2016;6:267–72 doi:10.1089/brain.2015.0402 pmid:26918887

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Hui M,
    2. Li J,
    3. Wen X, et al

    . An empirical comparison of information-theoretic criteria in estimating the number of independent components of fMRI data. PLoS One 2011;6:e29274 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029274 pmid:22216229

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Mitchell TJ,
    2. Hacker CD,
    3. Breshears JD, et al

    . A novel data-driven approach to preoperative mapping of functional cortex using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 2013;73:969–82; discussion 982–83 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000141 pmid:24264234

    CrossRefPubMed