Brain Activation Evoked by Motor Imagery in Pediatric Patients with Complete Spinal Cord Injury

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Benedetti B,
   2. Weidenhammer A,
   3. Reisinger M, et al

   . Spinal cord injury and loss of cortical inhibition. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:5622 doi:10.3390/ijms23105622 pmid:35628434

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Mcintyre A,
   2. Sadowsky C,
   3. Behrman A, et al

   ; the SCIRE Project Research Group. A systematic review of the scientific literature for rehabilitation/habilitation among individuals with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2022;28:13–90 doi:10.46292/sci21-00046 pmid:35145331

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Knikou M

   . Neural control of locomotion and training-induced plasticity after spinal and cerebral lesions. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:1655–68 doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.039 pmid:20427232

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Park E,
   2. Cha H,
   3. Kim E, et al

   . Alterations in power spectral density in motor- and pain-related networks on neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury. Neuroimage Clin 2020;28:102342 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102342 pmid:32798908

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Adams I,
   2. Smits-Engelsman B,
   3. Lust JM, et al

   . Feasibility of motor imagery training for children with developmental coordination disorder: a pilot study. Front Psychol 2017;8:1271 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01271 pmid:28798707

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Wang H,
   2. Xiong X,
   3. Zhang K, et al

   . Motor network reorganization after motor imagery training in stroke patients with moderate to severe upper limb impairment. CNS Neurosci Ther 2023;29:619–32 doi:10.1111/cns.14065 pmid:36575865

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Guerra ZF,
   2. Lucchetti ALG,
   3. Lucchetti G

   . Motor imagery training after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol Phys Ther 2017;41:205–14 doi:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000200 pmid:28922311

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Li F,
   2. Zhang T,
   3. Li BJ, et al

   . Motor imagery training induces changes in brain neural networks in stroke patients. Neural Regen Res 2018;13:1771–81 doi:10.4103/1673-5374.238616 pmid:30136692

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Tinaz S,
   2. Kamel S,
   3. Aravala SS, et al

   . Neurofeedback-guided kinesthetic motor imagery training in Parkinson’s disease: randomized trial. Neuroimage Clin 2022;34:102980 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102980 pmid:35247729

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Hetu S,
    2. Gregoire M,
    3. Saimpont A, et al

    . The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013;37:930–49 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017 pmid:23583615

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Wan L,
    3. Qin W, et al

    . Functional preservation and reorganization of brain during motor imagery in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot fMRI study. Front Hum Neurosci 2016;10:46 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00046 pmid:26913000

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Hardwick RM,
    2. Caspers S,
    3. Eickhoff SB, et al

    . Neural correlates of action: comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018;94:31–44 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003 pmid:30098990

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Cederstrom N,
    2. Graner S,
    3. Nilsson G, et al

    . Effect of motor imagery on enjoyment in knee-injury prevention and rehabilitation training: a randomized crossover study. J Sci Med Sport 2021;24:258–63 doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2020.09.004 pmid:32958377

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Regev M,
    2. Halpern AR,
    3. Owen AM, et al

    . Mapping specific mental content during musical imagery. Cereb Cortex 2021;31:3622–40 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab036 pmid:33749742

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Kahraman T,
    2. Savci S,
    3. Ozdogar AT, et al

    . Physical, cognitive and psychosocial effects of telerehabilitation-based motor imagery training in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Telemed Telecare 2020;26:251–60 doi:10.1177/1357633X18822355 pmid:30744491

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Sharp KG,
    2. Gramer R,
    3. Butler L, et al

    . Effect of overground training augmented by mental practice on gait velocity in chronic, incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:615–21 doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.016 pmid:24342552

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Pindus DM,
    2. Drollette ES,
    3. Raine LB, et al

    . Moving fast, thinking fast: the relations of physical activity levels and bouts to neuroelectric indices of inhibitory control in preadolescents. J Sport Health Sci 2019;8:301–14 doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2019.02.003 pmid:31333883

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Xie J,
    2. Jiang L,
    3. Li Y, et al

    . Rehabilitation of motor function in children with cerebral palsy based on motor imagery. Cogn Neurodyn 2021;15:939–48 doi:10.1007/s11571-021-09672-3 pmid:34790263

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Funk M,
    2. Brugger P,
    3. Wilkening F

    . Motor processes in children’s imagery: the case of mental rotation of hands. Dev Sci 2005;8:402–08 doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00428.x pmid:16048512

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Spruijt S,
    2. Jongsma ML,
    3. van der Kamp J, et al

    . Predictive models to determine imagery strategies employed by children to judge hand laterality. PLoS One 2015;10:e126568 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126568 pmid:25965271

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Souto DO,
    2. Cruz T,
    3. Coutinho K, et al

    . Effect of motor imagery combined with physical practice on upper limb rehabilitation in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. NRE 2020;46:53–63 doi:10.3233/NRE-192931 pmid:32039870

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Marshall B,
    2. Wright DJ,
    3. Holmes PS, et al

    . Combined action observation and motor imagery facilitates visuomotor adaptation in children with developmental coordination disorder. Res Dev Disabil 2020;98:103570 doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103570 pmid:31918039

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Scott MW,
    2. Wood G,
    3. Holmes PS, et al

    . Combined action observation and motor imagery: an intervention to combat the neural and behavioural deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021;127:638–46 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.015 pmid:34022280

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Malouin F,
    2. Richards CL,
    3. Jackson PL, et al

    . The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) for assessing motor imagery in persons with physical disabilities: a reliability and construct validity study. J Neurol Phys Ther 2007;31:20–29 doi:10.1097/01.NPT.0000260567.24122.64 pmid:17419886

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Butler AJ,
    2. Cazeaux J,
    3. Fidler A, et al

    . The Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised, Second Edition (MIQ-RS) is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating motor imagery in stroke populations. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012;2012:1–11 doi:10.1155/2012/497289 pmid:22474504

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Fan L,
    2. Li H,
    3. Zhuo J, et al

    . The Human Brainnetome Atlas: a new brain atlas based on connectional architecture. Cereb Cortex 2016;26:3508–26 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw157 pmid:27230218

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Behrendt F,
    2. Zumbrunnen V,
    3. Brem L, et al

    . Effect of motor imagery training on motor learning in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:9467 doi:10.3390/ijerph18189467 pmid:34574389

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Xiong X, et al

    . Motor imagery training after stroke increases slow-5 oscillations and functional connectivity in the ipsilesional inferior parietal lobule. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020;34:321–32 doi:10.1177/1545968319899919 pmid:32102610

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Glover S,
    2. Bibby E,
    3. Tuomi E

    . Executive functions in motor imagery: support for the motor-cognitive model over the functional equivalence model. Exp Brain Res 2020;238:931–44 doi:10.1007/s00221-020-05756-4 pmid:32179942

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Ward NS,
    2. Brown MM,
    3. Thompson AJ, et al

    . Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 2003;126:2476–96 doi:10.1093/brain/awg245 pmid:12937084

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Romanelli P,
    2. Esposito V,
    3. Schaal DW, et al

    . Somatotopy in the basal ganglia: experimental and clinical evidence for segregated sensorimotor channels. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005;48:112–28 doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.09.008 pmid:15708631

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Gittis AH,
    2. Kreitzer AC

    . Striatal microcircuitry and movement disorders. Trends Neurosci 2012;35:557–64 doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.06.008 pmid:22858522

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Patra A,
    2. Kaur H,
    3. Chaudhary P, et al

    . Morphology and morphometry of human paracentral lobule: an anatomical study with its application in neurosurgery. Asian J Neurosurg 2021;16:349–54 doi:10.4103/ajns.AJNS_505_20 pmid:34268163

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Si L,
    2. Cui B,
    3. Li Z, et al

    . Altered resting-state intranetwork and internetwork functional connectivity in patients with chronic unilateral vestibulopathy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022;56:291–300 doi:10.1002/jmri.28031 pmid:34921750

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Song X,
    3. Xu M, et al

    . Impaired interhemispheric synchrony in Parkinson’s disease with depression. Sci Rep 2016;6:27477 doi:10.1038/srep27477 pmid:27265427

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Kunimatsu J,
    2. Maeda K,
    3. Hikosaka O

    . The caudal part of putamen represents the historical object value information. J Neurosci 2019;39:1709–19 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2534-18.2018 pmid:30573645

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. Turner RS,
    2. Desmurget M,
    3. Grethe J, et al

    . Motor subcircuits mediating the control of movement extent and speed. J Neurophysiol 2003;90:3958–66 doi:10.1152/jn.00323.2003 pmid:12954606

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Stoodley CJ,
    2. Schmahmann JD

    . Evidence for topographic organization in the cerebellum of motor control versus cognitive and affective processing. Cortex 2010;46:831–44 doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.008 pmid:20152963

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Lorey B,
    2. Pilgramm S,
    3. Walter B, et al

    . Your mind’s hand: motor imagery of pointing movements with different accuracy. Neuroimage 2010;49:3239–47 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.038 pmid:19948224

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Brooks JX,
    2. Carriot J,
    3. Cullen KE

    . Learning to expect the unexpected: rapid updating in primate cerebellum during voluntary self-motion. Nat Neurosci 2015;18:1310–17 doi:10.1038/nn.4077 pmid:26237366

    CrossRefPubMed