Aneurysmal Parent Artery–Specific Inflow Conditions for Complete and Incomplete Circle of Willis Configurations

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Vlak MH,
   3. Algra A,
   4. Brandenburg R, et al

   . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Brisman JL,
   3. Song JK,
   4. Newell DW

   . Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2006;355:928–39 doi:10.1056/NEJMra052760 pmid:16943405

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Wiebers DO,
   3. Whisnant JP,
   4. Huston J 3rd., et al

   ; International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Morita A,
   3. Kirino T,
   4. Hashi K, et al

   ; UCAS Japan Investigators. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2474–82 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113260 pmid:22738097

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Xiang J,
   3. Natarajan SK,
   4. Tremmel M, et al

   . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592923 pmid:21106956

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Chien A,
   3. Sayre J

   . Morphologic and hemodynamic risk factors in ruptured aneurysms imaged before and after rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2130–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4016 pmid:24970547

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Valen-Sendstad K,
   3. Steinman DA

   . Mind the gap: impact of computational fluid dynamics solution strategy on prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics and rupture status indicators. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:536–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3793 pmid:24231854

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Castro MA,
   3. Putman CM,
   4. Cebral JR

   . Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1703–09 pmid:16971618

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Venugopal P,
   3. Valentino D,
   4. Schmitt H, et al

   . Sensitivity of patient-specific numerical simulation of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1051–60 doi:10.3171/jns.2007.106.6.1051 pmid:17564178

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Soto O, et al

    . Blood-flow models of the circle of Willis from magnetic resonance data. J Eng Math 2003;47:369–86 doi:10.1023/B:ENGI.0000007977.02652.02

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    2. Steinman DA,
    3. Milner JS,
    4. Norley CJ, et al

    . Image-based computational simulation of flow dynamics in a giant intracranial aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:559–66 pmid:12695182

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Stock KW,
    3. Wetzel SG,
    4. Lyrer PA, et al

    . Quantification of blood flow in the middle cerebral artery with phase-contrast MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1795–800 doi:10.1007/s003300000378 pmid:11097408

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Oktar SO,
    3. Yücel C,
    4. Karaosmanoglu D, et al

    . Blood-flow volume quantification in internal carotid and vertebral arteries: comparison of 3 different ultrasound techniques with phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:363–69 pmid:16484412

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Jansen IG,
    3. Schneiders JJ,
    4. Potters WV, et al

    . Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1543–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3901 pmid:24651816

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Tanaka H,
    3. Fujita N,
    4. Enoki T, et al

    . Relationship between variations in the circle of Willis and flow rates in internal carotid and basilar arteries determined by means of magnetic resonance imaging with semiautomated lumen segmentation: reference data from 125 healthy volunteers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1770–75 pmid:16971634

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. Marquering HA,
    4. van Ooij P, et al

    . Additional value of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics in discriminating ruptured versus unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1920–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4397 pmid:26206812

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Kwak R,
    3. Niizuma H,
    4. Suzuki J

    . Hemodynamics in the anterior part of the circle of Willis in patients with intracranial aneurysms: a study by cerebral angiography. Tohoku J Exp Med 1980:69–73 pmid:7209970

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Rinaldo L,
    3. McCutcheon BA,
    4. Murphy ME, et al

    . Relationship of A1 segment hypoplasia to anterior communicating artery aneurysm morphology and risk factors for aneurysm formation. J Neurosurg 2017;127:89–95 doi:10.3171/2016.7.JNS16736 pmid:27689465

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. van Raamt AF,
    3. Mali WP,
    4. van Laar PJ, et al

    . The fetal variant of the circle of Willis and its influence on the cerebral collateral circulation. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;22:217–24 doi:10.1159/000094007 pmid:16788293

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. De Monyé C,
    3. Dippel DW,
    4. Siepman TA, et al

    . Is a fetal origin of the posterior cerebral artery a risk factor for TIA or ischemic stroke? A study with 16-multidetector-row CT angiography. J Neurol 2008;255:239–45 doi:10.1007/s00415-008-0699-8 pmid:18274809

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Krabbe-Hartkamp MJ,
    3. van der Grond J,
    4. de Leeuw FE, et al

    . Circle of Willis: morphologic variation on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiograms. Radiology 1998;207:103–11 doi:10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530305 pmid:9530305

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Chunming L,
    3. Chenyang X,
    4. Changfeng G, et al

    . Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation. Proceedings of the 2005 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, California. June 20–26, 2005;1:430–36
23. 23.↵
    2. Lieber BB,
    3. Stancampiano AP,
    4. Wakhloo AK

    . Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting: influence of stent porosity. Ann Biomed Eng 1997;25:460–69 doi:10.1007/BF02684187 pmid:9146801

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Patti J,
    3. Viñuela F,
    4. Chien A

    . Distinct trends of pulsatility found at the necks of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:103–07 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010660 pmid:23416784

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Ford MD,
    3. Alperin N,
    4. Lee SH, et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2005;26:477–88 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/26/4/013 pmid:15886442

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Putman CM, et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/5/005 pmid:18460763

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Wåhlin A,
    3. Ambarki K,
    4. Birgander R, et al

    . Measuring pulsatile flow in cerebral arteries using 4D phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1740–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3442 pmid:23493888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Thierfelder KM,
    3. Baumann AB,
    4. Sommer WH, et al

    . Vertebral artery hypoplasia: frequency and effect on cerebellar blood flow characteristics. Stroke 2014;45:1363–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004188 pmid:24699051

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Hendrikse J,
    3. van Raamt AF,
    4. van der Graaf Y, et al

    . Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the circle of Willis. Radiology 2005;235:184–89 doi:10.1148/radiol.2351031799 pmid:15749975

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Hernandez M,
    4. Frangi A, et al

    . Subject-specific modeling of intracranial aneurysms. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Optics and Photonics Symposium on Electronic Imaging, San Diego, California. February 14–19, 2004;5369:319–27 doi:10.1117/12.535441
31. 31.↵
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. Ferns SP,
    4. van Ooij P, et al

    . Comparison of phase-contrast MR imaging and endovascular sonography for intracranial blood flow velocity measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1786–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3142 pmid:22576898

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Xiang J,
    3. Siddiqui AH,
    4. Meng H

    . The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms. J Biomech 2014;47:3882–90 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.09.034 pmid:25446264

    CrossRefPubMed