In Vitro and In Vivo Imaging Characteristics Assessment of Polymeric Coils Compared with Standard Platinum Coils for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Molyneux AJ,
   2. Kerr RS,
   3. Yu LM,
   4. et al

   . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Byrne JV,
   2. Sohn MJ,
   3. Molyneux AJ,
   4. et al

   . Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999;90:656–63

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Kang HS,
   2. Han MH,
   3. Kwon BJ,
   4. et al

   . Repeat endovascular treatment in post-embolization recurrent intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;58:60–70

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Campi A,
   2. Ramzi N,
   3. Molyneux AJ,
   4. et al

   . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fernandez ZA,
   2. Guglielmi G,
   3. Vinuela F,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Ries T,
   2. Siemonsen S,
   3. Thomalla G,
   4. et al

   . Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755–61

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Bakker NA,
   2. Westerlaan HE,
   3. Metzemaekers JD,
   4. et al

   . Feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) follow-up as the primary imaging modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Acta Radiol 2010;51:226–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Ferre JC,
   2. Carsin-Nicol B,
   3. Morandi X,
   4. et al

   . Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:365–69

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Wallace RC,
    2. Karis JP,
    3. Partovi S,
    4. et al

    . Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1001–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Urbach H,
    2. Dorenbeck U,
    3. von Falkenhausen M,
    4. et al

    . Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of ruptured and coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology 2008;50:383–89

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Gonner F,
    2. Heid O,
    3. Remonda L,
    4. et al

    . MR angiography with ultrashort echo time in cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1324–28

    Abstract
13. 13.↵
    1. Walker MT,
    2. Tsai J,
    3. Parish T,
    4. et al

    . MR angiographic evaluation of platinum coil packs at 1.5T and 3T: an in vitro assessment of artifact production: technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:848–53

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Hennemeyer CT,
    2. Wicklow K,
    3. Feinberg DA,
    4. et al

    . In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 2001;219:732–37

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Gauvrit JY,
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Caron S,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006;37:1033–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Agid R,
    2. Willinsky RA,
    3. Lee SK,
    4. et al

    . Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1570–74

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Constant MJ,
    2. Keeley EM,
    3. Cruise GM

    . Preparation, characterization, and evaluation of radiopaque hydrogel filaments for endovascular embolization. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;89:306–13

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. McCoy MR,
    2. Cruise GM,
    3. Killer M

    . Angiographic and artefact-free computed tomography imaging of experimental aneurysms embolised with hydrogel filaments. Eur Radiol 2010;20:870–76

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Killer M,
    2. McCoy MR,
    3. Vestal MC,
    4. et al

    . Use of CT angiography in comparison with other imaging techniques for the determination of embolus and remnant size in experimental aneurysms embolized with hydrogel filaments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:923–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Forrest MD,
    2. O'Reilly GV

    . Production of experimental aneurysms at a surgically created arterial bifurcation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:400–02

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Taylor SM,
    3. TerBrugge K,
    4. et al

    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Kaufmann TJ,
    2. Huston J III.,
    3. Mandrekar JN,
    4. et al

    . Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Anzalone N,
    2. Scomazzoni F,
    3. Cirillo M,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008;43:559–67

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Sprengers ME,
    2. Schaafsma JD,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1665–71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Portefaix C,
    3. Boulin A,
    4. et al

    . Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2255–63

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Richter G,
    2. Engelhorn T,
    3. Struffert T,
    4. et al

    . Flat panel detector angiographic CT for stent-assisted coil embolization of broad-based cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1902–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Masaryk AM,
    2. Frayne R,
    3. Unal O,
    4. et al

    . Utility of CT angiography and MR angiography for the follow-up of experimental aneurysms treated with stents or Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1523–31

    Abstract/FREE Full Text