Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Predicting Angiographic Stenosis of the Internal Carotid Artery: Linear Regression Analysis

References

1. ↵
   North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–1425

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421–1428

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc committee, American Heart Association. Stroke 1995;26:188–201

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL. Complications of angiography. Radiology 1981;138:273–281

   PubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Enochs WS, Ackerman RH, Kaufman JA, Candia M. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. J Neuroimaging 1998;8:185–190

   CrossRefPubMed
7. Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography: preliminary study. Radiology 1998;209:95–102

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Nicol L, Pruvo JP. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review. Neuroradiology 1999;41:867–874

   CrossRefPubMed
9. Kollias SS, Binkert CA, Ruesch S, Valavanis A. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study. Neuroradiology 1999;41:391–400

   CrossRefPubMed
10. Leclerc X, Martinat P, Godefroy O, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1405–1413

    Abstract
11. Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). J Neuroradiol 1999;26:87–91

    PubMed
12. Huston J III, Fain SB, Wald JT, et al. Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced angiography compared with conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;218:138–143

    CrossRefPubMed
13. Fellner FA, Fellner C, Wutke R, et al. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA and 3D time-of-flight turbo MRA of the carotid arteries: first clinical experiences in correlation with ultrasound, x-ray angiography, and endarterectomy findings. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:575–585

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179–185

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    El-Saden SM, Grant EG, Hathout GM, Zimmerman PT, Cohen SN, Baker JD. Imaging of the internal carotid artery: the dilemma of total versus near total occlusion. Radiology 2001;221:301–308

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Fell G, Phillips DJ, Chikos PM, Harley JD, Thiele BL, Strandness DE Jr. Ultrasonic duplex scanning for disease of the carotid artery. Circulation 1981;64:1191–1195

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. Garth KE, Carroll BA, Sommer FG, Oppenheimer DA. Duplex ultrasound scanning of the carotid arteries with velocity spectrum analysis. Radiology 1983;147:823–827

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. Zwiebel WJ, Austin CW, Sackett JF, Strother CM. Correlation of high-resolution, B-mode and continuous-wave Doppler sonography with arteriography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis. Radiology 1983;149:523–532

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. Jacobs NM, Grant EG, Schellinger D, Byrd MC, Richardson JD, Cohan SL. Duplex carotid sonography: criteria for stenosis, accuracy, and pitfalls. Radiology 1985;154:385–391

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. Bluth EI, Stavros AT, Marich KW, Wetzner SM, Aufrichtig D, Baker JD. Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for standardized imaging and Doppler criteria. Radiographics 1988;8:487–506

    PubMed
21. Robinson ML, Sacks D, Perlmutter GS, Marinelli DL. Diagnostic criteria for carotid duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:1045–1049

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Grant EG, Duerinckx AJ, El-Saden S, et al. Doppler sonographic parameters for detection of carotid stenosis: is there an optimum method for their selection? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1123–1129

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Grant EG, Duerinckx AJ, El Saden SM, et al. Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid arterial stenoses: fact or fiction? Radiology 2000;214:247–252

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Wonnacott TH, Wonnacott RJ. Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons;1977 .
25. ↵
    Barnett HJ, Meldrum HE, Eliasziw M. The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy. CMAJ 2002;166:1169–1179

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Collie DA, Sellar R. Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis: effect of observer experience. Neuroradiology 2002;44:126–132

    CrossRefPubMed
27. ↵
    Johnston DC. Goldstein LB. Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology 2001;56:1009–1015

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    Dippel DW, van Kooten F, Bakker SL, Koudstaal PJ. Interobserver agreement for 10% categories of angiographic carotid stenosis. Stroke 1997;28:2483–2485

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    Gagne PJ, Matchett J, MacFarland D, et al. Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside the trial? J Vasc Surg 1996;24:449–456

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    Young GR, Sandercock PA, Slattery J, Humphrey PR, Smith ET, Brock L. Observer variation in the interpretation of intra-arterial angiograms and the risk of inappropriate decisions about carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;60:152–157

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    Young GR, Humphrey PR, Nixon TE, Smith ET. Variability in measurement of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis as displayed by both digital subtraction and magnetic resonance angiography: an assessment of three caliper techniques and visual impression of stenosis. Stroke 1996;27:467–473

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–1407

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Aoki S, Nakajima H, Kumagai H, Araki T. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:381–385

    Abstract/FREE Full Text