Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleBRAIN

MR Volumetric Analysis of The Piriform Cortex and Cortical Amygdala in Drug-Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Pedro M. Gonçalves Pereira, Ricardo Insausti, Emilio Artacho-Pérula, Tuuli Salmenperä, Reetta Kälviäinen and Asla Pitkänen
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2005, 26 (2) 319-332;
Pedro M. Gonçalves Pereira
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo Insausti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilio Artacho-Pérula
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tuuli Salmenperä
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reetta Kälviäinen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asla Pitkänen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Brightfield photomicrographs of thionin-stained sections on the coronal plane show cytoarchitectonic borders (arrowheads) of the different components of the piriform cortex-cortical amygdala (PCA) region as defined in the present study. A is the most rostal (at the level of the limen insulae) and D is the most caudal (hippocampal head). PC indicates piriform cortex; PRC, perirhinal cortex; es, endorhinal sulcus; PAC, periamygdaloid cortex; L, amygdala lateral nucleus; EC, entorhinal cortex; AB, amygdala accessory basal nucleus; B, amygdala basal nucleus; ssa, sulcus semiannularis; cs, colateral sulcus; AHA, amygdalo-hippocampal area; CA1, hippocampal field 1; Sub, subiculum; hf, hippocampal fissure; asterisk, lateral ventricle. Scale bar equals 2 mm.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Schematic representation of the rostrocaudal location and extent of the major landmarks relative to the limen insula (set at 0) used to define the PCA. Numbers on the left (mean distance in millimeters ± SD) were calculated from control histologic cases (23 temporal lobes) and on the right from the MR imaging control group (46 temporal lobes). The values between arrows depict the mean (± 1 SD) distances between the rostro-caudal limits of the PCA, the amygdaloid complex (A), and the hippocampus (HC).

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Successive 2-mm coronal MR images demonstrate the location of the PCA. A is the most rostral and F is the most caudal. A, Shows the limen insulae (LI); B, first section where the characteristic ovoid shape of the amygdala (A) can be recognized; C, full extent of the amygdala (A) with lateral ventricle appearing underneath (asterisk); D, appearance of the rostral hippocampus (HC); E, rostral hippocampus at the level of the hippocampal head and lateral ventricle (asterisk); and F, hippocampal fissure (hf; arrow). Scale bar equals 20 mm (applies to all panels).

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Coronal 2-mm-thick MR images from a control subject demonstrate the outline of the PCA at different rostrocaudal levels. Line drawings of the same MR imaging sections demonstrating more anatomic details are shown in Figure 5 (numbers in the lower left corner correspond to the levels of the line-drawings). A is the most rostral and K is the most caudal. In panels A and B, the thickness of the perirhinal cortex, which serves as reference for the thickness of the PCA is indicated. Panel C marks the anterior-most limit of the entorhinal cortex. In panels D, E and F, the characteristic ovoid shape of the amygdala can be recognized. Panel G shows the appearance of the subiculum. Panels H–K show the hippocampal head. EC indicates entorhinal cortex; cs, colateral sulcus (arrow); A, amygdala; es, endorhinal sulcus (arrow); HC, hippocampus; hf, hippocampal fissure (arrow); LI, limen insulae; PRC, perirhinal cortex; ssa, sulcus semiannularis (arrow); Sub, subiculum; and arrowheads, boundaries of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortices. Scale bar equals 10 mm (applies to all panels).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Line-drawings corresponding to MR images in Figure 4 summarize the anatomic landmarks used to draw the outlines of the PCA. Only the images displaying critical landmarks are shown. In section #1 (Fig 4A), the appearance of the limen insulae (LI) marks the reference level for outlining the PCA. At this level, the PCA extends 30% of the distance between the endorhinal sulcus (es) to the most convex point of the medial temporal cortex (asterisk). Its thickness is reaches 25% that of the adjacent perirhinal cortex (PRC). In section #2 (Fig 4B), the PCA occupies 50% of the distance of the endorhinal sulcus-medial temporal lobe convexity (arrow). Its thickness is 25% of that of the adjacent PRC. In section #2 (Fig 4C), the PCA extends down as far as the continuation of the limit of the white matter at its crossing with the pial surface (alternatively, if it were absent, the limit is given by the visualization of the sulcus semiannularis). This distance represents up to 80% of the distance of the es-medial temporal lobe convexity. The PCA borders ventrally the most medial aspect of the entorhinal cortex (EO subfield) (49). Its thickness is 25% that of the adjacent PRC. Section #4 (Fig 4D) is at the level of the rostralmost portion of the amygdala. At this level, the PCA extends from the endorhinal sulcus down to the sulcus semiannularis (ssa), or in its absence, as in the previous level. Its thickness encompasses the entire cortical gray matter. In section #6 (Fig 4F), the amygdala is larger. The PCA occupies the entire medial temporal cortex down from the endorhinal sulcus to the sulcus semiannularis. Its thickness encompasses the entire cortical gray matter. In sections 7–9 (Fig 4G–I), the rostral hippocampus appears. The PCA is defined as in level #6. In section #11, the opening of the hippocampal fissure (hf) marks the last image to be quantified. HC indicates hippocampus; cs, colateral sulcus; Sub, subiculum. Scale bar equals 10 mm (all panels).

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Scatter plots show the intra- and inter-observer variability of repeated measurements in the assessment of the right and left volume of the PCA of 10 control subjects. A, shows intra-observer measurement (P.M.G.P.); and B, inter-observer measurement (P.M.G.P. versus T.S.). The limits of agreement between the first and second measurements are expressed as the mean difference in volume: [volume in the first measurement minus volume in the second measurement (mm3)] ± 2 SD. Inserts in the lower left corner show the association between the first (x-axis) and second (y-axis). Mean indicates mean difference in volume; +2 SD, mean difference in volume plus two SD; −2 SD, mean difference in volume minus two SD.

  • Fig 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 7.

    Plot of the individual volume estimation of the PCA, obtained by the stereological assessment of seven brain hemispheres (see Materials and Methods section for details). Each square represents a case. Group mean ± 1 SD is indicated on the right side.

  • Fig 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 8.

    Scatter plots show the correlation between the ipsilateral and contralateral volumes of the PCA and the volumes of the hippocampus (A), amygdala (B), and entorhinal cortex (C) in patients with TLE. PCA volumes correlated with the atrophy in the hippocampus, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex. Closed circles refer to the ipsilateral values and open circles to the contralateral values. Mean indicates mean volume in control subjects; - 1 SD, mean volume in control subjects minus one SD; - 2 SD, mean volume in control subjects minus two SD; n, number of patients; r, Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1:

    Normalized volumes and asymmetry ratios of the right and left hippocampus, amygdala complex and entorhinal cortex

    GroupHippocampusΔ HCAmygdalaΔ AMYEntorhinal CortexΔ EC
    Controls (n = 23)
    Right3623 ± 468 (2825–4579)2333 ± 263 (1983–2882)1400 ± 279 (965–2088)
    Left3412 ± 347 (2898–4186)8.1 ± 6.22484 ± 400 (2041–3372)9.0 ± 7.41399 ± 210 (1038–1809)9.3 ± 7.3
    Right TLE (n = 18)
    Right3131 ± 1082 (1288–4404)2336 ± 404 (1501–3303)1272 ± 240 (999–1904)
    Left3434 ± 539 (2507–4474)25.4 ± 21.42459 ± 244 (2149–3027)11.2 ± 11.01230 ± 176 (942–1580)13.3 ± 9.8
    Left TLE (n = 21)
    Right3488 ± 591 (2360–4189)2351 ± 352 (1774–3286)1370 ± 272 (839–1929)
    Left2851 ± 912 (1237–3840)26.2 ± 24.52355 ± 395 (1657–2909)10.1 ± 10.71248 ± 220 (934–1782)12.8 ± 10.3
    • All volumes are presented as mean ± one standard deviation of the mean (range) and given in mm3. Asymmetry ratios (Δ) are presented as mean ± one standard deviation of the mean and given in percentages. HC indicates hippocampus; AMY, amygdala; EC, entorhinal cortex; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2:

    Normalized volumes and asymmetry ratio of the right and left piriform-cortical amygdala in control subjects and patients groups and subgroups

    GroupRight PCALeft PCAΔ PCA
    Controls(n = 23)530 ± 59 (422–644)512 ± 60 (406–610)7.2 ± 4.1
    Right TLEAll Patients (n = 18)436 ± 71 (367–585)***526 ± 59 (408–612)19.3 ± 12.6***
    HS Patients (n = 8)384 ± 28 (367–430)***°°508 ± 59 (408–607)27.1 ± 14.4***
    Without HS (n = 10)476 ± 69 (377–585)541 ± 58 (461–612)13.0 ± 6.3*
    Left TLEAll Patients (n = 21)512 ± 70 (364–605)427 ± 68 (307–506)**€€€19.2 ± 16.0*
    HS Patients (n = 11)492 ± 83 (364–603)388 ± 61 (307–488)***¥¥24.0 ± 18.0*
    Without HS (n = 10)535 ± 45 (458–605)470 ± 47 (375–509)13.9 ± 12.4
    • All volumes are presented as mean ± one standard deviation of the mean (range) and given in mm3. Asymmetry ratios (Δ) are presented as mean ± one standard deviation of the mean (range) and given in percentages. Nonparametric analyses with the Bonferroni correction were used to compare means over the study groups and to determine differences between the groups.

    • * P < .05,

    • ** P < .01,

    • *** P < .001 compared to controls.

    • Embedded Image Embedded Image P < .01 compared to left TLE patients,

    • €€€ P < .001 compared to right TLE patients,

    • °° P < .01 compared to right TLE patients without HS,

    • ¥¥ P < .01 compared to left TLE patients without HS. HS indicates hippocampal sclerosis; PCA, piriform-cortical amygdala; TLE, temporal lobe epilepsy.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (2)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 2
1 Feb 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Volumetric Analysis of The Piriform Cortex and Cortical Amygdala in Drug-Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Pedro M. Gonçalves Pereira, Ricardo Insausti, Emilio Artacho-Pérula, Tuuli Salmenperä, Reetta Kälviäinen, Asla Pitkänen
MR Volumetric Analysis of The Piriform Cortex and Cortical Amygdala in Drug-Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2005, 26 (2) 319-332;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Volumetric Analysis of The Piriform Cortex and Cortical Amygdala in Drug-Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Pedro M. Gonçalves Pereira, Ricardo Insausti, Emilio Artacho-Pérula, Tuuli Salmenperä, Reetta Kälviäinen, Asla Pitkänen
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2005, 26 (2) 319-332;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • PhyloBrain atlas: a cortical brain MRI atlas following a phylogenetic approach
  • Novel use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Delineate the Rat Basolateral Amygdala
  • Mesial Temporal Sclerosis: Accuracy of NeuroQuant versus Neuroradiologist
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
  • Optimal MRI Sequence for Identifying Occlusion Location in Acute Stroke: Which Value of Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MRA?
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire