A Study on Maximum Skin Dose in Cerebral Embolization Procedures

References

1. ↵
   Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Houston J 3rd, et al. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   European Union. Council Directive 97/43 Euratom of 30 June 1997, Official Journal of the European Communities,1997; Legislation, L. 180
4. ↵
   Food and Drug Administration. Recording information in the patient's medical record that identifies the potential for serious x-ray induced skin injuries. Washington DC: Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration,1995
5. ↵
   Valentin J. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 2000;30:7–67

   PubMed
6. ↵
   Miller DL, Balter S, Wagner LK, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for recording patient radiation dose in the medical record. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:423–29

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   McParland BJ. Entrance skin dose estimates derived from dose-area product measurements in interventional radiological procedures. Br J Radiol 1998;71:1288–95

   Abstract
8. ↵
   Gafchromic XR Type R radiochromic dosimetry film. Characteristic performance data. ISP (International Specialty Products) Available at http://www.ispcorp.com/products/dosimetry/content/gafchromic/index.html
9. ↵
   Fletcher DW, Miller DL, Balter S, et al. Comparison of four techniques to estimate radiation dose to skin during angiographic and interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:391–97

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Schueler BA, Kallmes D, Cloft HJ. 3D cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1898–901

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    Mettler FA, Voelz GL. Major radiation exposure what to expect and how to respond. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1554–61

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Koenig TR, Mettler FA, Wagner LK. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 2, review of 73 cases and recommendations for minimizing dose delivered to patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:13–20

    PubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Norbash AM, Busick D, Marks MP. Techniques for reducing interventional neuroradiologic skin dose: tube position rotation and supplemental beam filtration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:41–49

    Abstract
14. ↵
    Mahesh M. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. RadioGraphics 2001;21:1033–45

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Waite JC, Fitzgerald M. An assessment of methods for monitoring entrance surface dose in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2001;94:89–92

    Abstract