Counterpoint: Has the Last Word Been Said?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. van Rooij WJ,
   2. Sluzewski M

   . Opinion: imaging follow-up after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1646–48

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Guglielmi G.,
   2. Vinuela F,
   3. Sepetka I,
   4. et al

   . Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1. Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg 1991;75:1–7

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Mitchell P,
   2. Kerr R,
   3. Mendelow AD,
   4. et al

   . Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial? J Neurosurg 2008;108:437–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Clip versus coil. J Neurosurg 2009;110:190–91

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Raymond J

   . Incidental intracranial aneurysms: rationale for treatment. Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22:96–102

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Sluzewski M,
   2. van Rooij WJ,
   3. Rinkel GJ,
   4. et al

   . Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with detachable coils: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. Radiology 2003;227:720–24

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Raymond J,
   2. Guilbert F,
   3. Weill A,
   4. et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Sprengers ME,
   2. Schaafsma J,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . Stability of intracranial aneurysms adequately occluded 6 months after coiling: a 3T MR angiography multicenter long-term follow-up study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1768–74

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Schaafsma JD,
   2. Sprengers ME,
   3. van Rooij WJ,
   4. et al

   . Long-term recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after adequate coiling versus clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2009;40:1758–63. Epub 2009 Mar 12

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. Greebe P,
    3. Algra A,
    4. et al

    . Incidence of recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage after clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2005;36:2394–99

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. van der Schaaf IC,
    2. Velthuis BK,
    3. Wermer MJ,
    4. et al.

    , for the ASTRA Study Group. New detected aneurysms on follow-up screening in patients with previously clipped intracranial aneurysms: comparison with DSA or CTA at the time of SAH. Stroke 2005;36:1753–58. Epub 2005 Jul 7

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Campi A,
    2. Ramzi N,
    3. Molyneux AJ,
    4. et al

    . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. van der Schaaf IC,
    3. Velthuis BK,
    4. et al.

    , for the ASTRA Study Group. Follow-up screening after subarachnoid haemorrhage: frequency and determinants of new aneurysms and enlargement of existing aneurysms. Brain 2005;128:2421–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. Buskens E,
    3. van der Schaaf IC,
    4. et al

    . Yield of screening for new aneurysms after treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2004;62:369–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. Koffijberg H,
    3. van der Schaaf IC

    , for the ASTRA Study Group. Effectiveness and costs of screening for aneurysms every 5 years after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology 2008;70:2053–62

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al

    . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Sprengers ME,
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Sluzewski M,
    4. et al

    . MR Angiography follow-up 5 years after coiling: frequency of new aneurysms and enlargement of untreated aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:303–07. Epub 2008 Oct 29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Wermer MJ,
    2. van der Schaaf IC,
    3. Velthuis BK,
    4. et al

    . Yield of short-term follow-up CT/MR angiography for small aneurysms detected at screening. Stroke 2006;37:414–18

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Juvela S,
    2. Poussa K,
    3. Porras M

    . Factors affecting formation and growth of intracranial aneurysms: a long-term follow-up study. Stroke 2001;32:485–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Burns JD,
    2. Huston J 3rd.,
    3. Layton KF,
    4. et al

    . Intracranial aneurysm enlargement on serial magnetic resonance angiography: frequency and risk factors. Stroke 2009;40:406–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Pierot L,
    2. Spelle L,
    3. Vitry F

    , for the ATENA Investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497–504. Epub 2008 Jul 10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text