Transcranial Access Using Fluoroscopic Flat Panel Detector CT Navigation

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Braak S,
   2. van Strijen M,
   3. Van Leersum M,
   4. et al

   . Effective dose during needle interventions: real time 3D fluoroscopy guidance versus CT fluoroscopy. In: Proceedings of the 94th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, Illinois. November 30-December 5, 2008
2. 2.↵
   1. Racadio J,
   2. Yoshizumi T,
   3. Toncheva G,
   4. et al

   . Radiation dosimetry evaluation of C-arm cone beam CT for pediatric interventional radiology procedures: a comparison with MDCT. In: Proceedings of the 94th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, Illinois. November 30-December 5, 2008
3. 3.↵
   1. Noordhoek NJ,
   2. van de Haar P,
   3. Timmer J

   . Direct comparison of commercially available C-arm CT to multi-slice CT image quality. In: Proceedings of the 94th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago, Illinois. November 30-December 5, 2008
4. 4.↵
   1. Miracle A,
   2. Mukherji S

   . Conebeam CT of the head and neck. Part 1. Physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1088–95.Epub 2009 May 13

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Miracle A,
   2. Mukherji S

   . Conebeam CT of the head and neck. Part 2. Clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1285–92.Epub 2009 May 20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Heran N,
   2. Song J,
   3. Namba K,
   4. et al

   . The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:330–32

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Daly M,
   2. Siewerdsen J,
   3. Moseley D,
   4. et al

   . Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. Med Phys 2006;33:3767–80

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Doelken M,
   2. Struffert T,
   3. Richter G,
   4. et al

   . Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT. Neuroradiology 2008;50:517–23

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Söderman M,
   2. Babic D,
   3. Holmin S,
   4. et al

   . Brain imaging with a flat detector C-arm: technique and clinical interest of XperCT. Neuroradiology 2008;50:863–68.Epub 2008 Jun 17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Racadio J,
    2. Babic D,
    3. Homan R,
    4. et al

    . Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:W357–64

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Dörfler A,
    2. Struffert T,
    3. Engelhorn T,
    4. et al

    . Rotational flat-panel computed tomography in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Rofo 2008;180:891–98

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Huyette D,
    2. Turnbow B,
    3. Kaufman C,
    4. et al

    . Accuracy of the freehand pass technique for ventriculostomy catheter placement: retrospective assessment using computed tomography scans. J Neurosurg 2008;108:88–91

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Binz DD,
    2. Toussaint LG 3rd.,
    3. Friedman JA

    . Hemorrhagic complications of ventriculostomy placement: a meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care 2009;10:253–56.Epub 2009 Feb 18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Kakarla UL,
    2. Kim LJ,
    3. Chang SW,
    4. et al

    . Safety and accuracy of bedside external ventricular drain placement. Neurosurgery 2008;63 (1 suppl 1):ONS162–66,discussion ONS166–67

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Saladino A,
    2. White J,
    3. Wijdicks E,
    4. et al

    . Malplacement of ventricular catheters by neurosurgeons: a single institution experience. Neurocrit Care 2009;10:248–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Banerjee P,
    2. Luciano C,
    3. Lemole GJ,
    4. et al

    . Accuracy of ventriculostomy catheter placement using a head- and hand-tracked high-resolution virtual reality simulator with haptic feedback. J Neurosurg 2007;107:515–21

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Krötz M,
    2. Linsenmaier U,
    3. Kanz K,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of minimally invasive percutaneous CT-controlled ventriculostomy in patients with severe head trauma. Eur Radiol 2004;14:227–33

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Barrett R,
    2. Hussain R,
    3. Coplin W,
    4. et al

    . Frameless stereotactic aspiration and thrombolysis of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2005;3:237–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Morgan T,
    2. Zuccarello M,
    3. Narayan R,
    4. et al

    . Preliminary findings of the minimally-invasive surgery plus rtPA for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) clinical trial. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008;105:147–51

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Vespa P,
    2. McArthur D,
    3. Miller C,
    4. et al

    . Frameless stereotactic aspiration and thrombolysis of deep intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with reduction of hemorrhage volume and neurological improvement. Neurocrit Care 2005;2:274–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Thiex R,
    2. Rohde V,
    3. Rohde I,
    4. et al

    . Frame-based and frameless stereotactic hematoma puncture and subsequent fibrinolytic therapy for the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol 2004;251:1443–50

    CrossRefPubMed