Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleInterventional

Risk Factors for Early Hemorrhagic Complications after Endovascular Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

T. Ohta, K. Murao, K. Miyake, K. Takemoto and K. Nakazawa
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2014, 35 (11) 2136-2139; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4033
T. Ohta
aFrom the Department of Neuroendovascular Treatment, Shiroyama Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Murao
aFrom the Department of Neuroendovascular Treatment, Shiroyama Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Miyake
aFrom the Department of Neuroendovascular Treatment, Shiroyama Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Takemoto
aFrom the Department of Neuroendovascular Treatment, Shiroyama Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Nakazawa
aFrom the Department of Neuroendovascular Treatment, Shiroyama Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk factors of early hemorrhagic complications after endovascular coiling are not well-known. We identified the factors affecting early hemorrhagic complications, defined as any expansion or appearance of hemorrhage shown by head CT in the initial 48 hours after coiling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a series of 93 patients who underwent coiling for a ruptured saccular aneurysm between 2006 and 2012 at our hospital.

RESULTS: Five patients showed early hemorrhagic complications, and all involved an expansion of the existing intracerebral hematoma immediately after coiling. The associated risk factors were accompanying intracerebral hemorrhage at onset (P < .001), postoperative antiplatelet therapy (P < .001), and thromboembolic complications (P = .044). In the accompanying intracerebral hemorrhage group, the associated risk factors were postoperative antiplatelet therapy (P = .044) and earlier initiation of coiling (9.8 ± 6.5 versus 28.1 ± 24.0 hours, P = .023). Early hemorrhagic complications were significant risk factors for worse clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale, 2.02 ± 2.21 versus 4.4 ± 2.30, P = .022). None of the 93 patients showed further hemorrhage after the initial 48 hours after coiling.

CONCLUSIONS: The accompanying intracerebral hemorrhage at onset, thromboembolic complications, postoperative antiplatelet therapy, and earlier initiation of coiling were the risk factors for early hemorrhagic complications.

ABBREVIATION:

ICH
intracerebral hematoma

A recent guideline stated that endovascular coiling should be considered if ruptured aneurysms were judged to be technically amenable to both endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping.1 Consequently, the use of coiling for ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms has been increasing. One problem is that the incidence of periprocedural hemorrhagic complications within 30 days was reportedly high in the endovascular arm of a study,2 and they were reported to be associated with high mortality and morbidity.3 The risk factors for such early hemorrhagic complications are not well-known. Although the word “rebleeding” is often used for perioperative hemorrhagic complications, it is also unclear whether “rebleeding” is really caused by a rerupture of the aneurysm or is due to other mechanisms. Therefore, we analyzed cases of coiling for ruptured saccular aneurysms in which early hemorrhagic complications had occurred within 48 hours after coiling, to identify factors affecting these complications.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a series of 93 patients who underwent coiling for a ruptured saccular aneurysm between September 2006 and March 2012 at our hospital. Only patients for whom coiling was performed within 3 days of diagnosis were included. We generally recommend early treatment for subarachnoid hemorrhage; however, 7 patients had unstable circulatory conditions that inhibited early interventions; 6 patients were first admitted to another hospital and then were referred to our hospital 1 or 2 days after onset. All patients presented with SAH confirmed by CT. Patients with accompanying intracerebral hematoma (ICH) other than SAH on preprocedural head CT were defined as having “accompanying ICH.” The ruptured aneurysms were identified by CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography. The choice of clipping or coiling was determined by discussion with the neurosurgeons. If the patient had a large ICH with a widespread effect such as ICH with a poor World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade4 of IV and V, clipping with evacuation of the ICH was selected. If the patient had a small ICH with a minimal effect such as ICH with a good World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade, coiling was selected when technically feasible.

Coiling was started as soon as the operator, anesthesiologist, and the patient's medical condition were ready for the treatment. All treatments were performed with the patient under general anesthesia and having been given systemic heparinization with an activated clotting time of approximately 200–250 seconds. In cases with multiple aneurysms, the ruptured one was estimated by the distribution of the subarachnoid hemorrhage. Blood pressures were maintained within normal range. Coiling was performed simply or with an adjunctive technique such as balloon assist. No stents were applied. The strategy of coiling was to employ packing sufficient for hemostasis. Antiplatelet therapy was initiated when intraoperative thrombus formation was found. At the end of treatment, heparin was not reversed but was discontinued because the last activated clotting time was usually <200 seconds. Heparin was reversed with protamine if bleeding events occurred. General anesthesia was continued until the day after the procedure to avoid perioperative elevated intracranial pressure, which is associated with a patient's clinical outcome.5

The clinical condition before coiling was assessed according to the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade. Early hemorrhagic complications were defined as an occurrence of new bleeding or enlargement of the pre-existing ICH within 48 hours after coiling. Early rebleeding from the treated aneurysm was assumed if postoperative CT showed an extravasation of contrast or the new hemorrhage was found only in the subarachnoid space. If the postoperative CT did not show any leakage of contrast and the new hemorrhage was added to ICH, we defined the new hemorrhage as an expansion of the accompanying ICH. Diagnostic confirmation was accepted when CT showed an augmentation of any hemorrhage, including SAH, intraventricular hematoma, or intracerebral hemorrhage, compared with that shown on the preprocedural CT, as judged by 2 physicians (T.O. and K.M.). Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the modified Rankin Scale on postoperative day 30.6 The degree of aneurysmal occlusion was assessed by packing density calculated from the volume of the inserted coil divided by the preprocedural 3D aneurysmal volume, except for the intraoperative perforated cases because coil volume outside the aneurysm could not be evaluated in these cases.

Statistical Analysis

The Fisher exact test or Student t test, as appropriate, was used to compare factors such as accompanying ICH, aneurysmal location, postoperative antiplatelet therapy, intraoperative perforation, and symptomatic thromboembolic complications, which were detected on postoperative head MR imaging; packing density (when calculated); and time to coil in each group. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. The P value was expressed to 2 significant figures; if the value was <.001, it was expressed as P < .001.

Results

Coiling was performed in 93 patients, including 26 men and 67 women, 65.1 ± 15.0 years of age. During the same period, clipping was performed in 136 patients. Multiple aneurysms were observed in 5 patients. The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade was 2.80 ± 1.54, and the location of the aneurysms was supratentorial in 75 patients (80.6%). The aneurysms were located in the anterior communicating artery (29 cases), internal carotid artery (17 cases), internal carotid–posterior communicating artery (15 cases), basilar tip and basilar–superior cerebellar artery (12 cases), middle cerebral artery (7 cases), vertebral artery–posterior inferior cerebellar artery and vertebrobasilar junction (4 cases), and other locations (9 cases). The maximum diameter of the aneurysms was 6.89 ± 3.1 mm. Eighteen patients (19.4%) had accompanying ICH with SAH at the first head CT (accompanying ICH group). Significantly more patients with poor neurological status, as shown by World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grades IV and V (66.7% versus 29.3%, respectively; P = .006) and poor clinical outcome, as shown by modified Rankin Scale grades 4 and 5 (66.7% versus 24%, respectively; P = .001), were included in the accompanying ICH group than in the nonaccompanying ICH group.

Five patients had early hemorrhagic complications (5.4%). All of the early hemorrhagic complications occurred within 24 hours. No patient had early hemorrhagic complications defined as SAH even in the 4 cases of intraoperative perforations. Hemorrhagic transformation of cerebral infarction was not observed. All early hemorrhagic complications involved the expansion of the accompanying ICH. Characteristics of the 5 patients, radiologic findings, and surgical outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Comparisons between the early hemorrhagic complications group and the nonhemorrhagic group are shown in Table 2. Accompanying ICH (P < .001), postoperative antiplatelet therapy (P < .001), and thromboembolic complications (P = .044) were associated with early hemorrhagic complications. In 1 patient (case 3), endoscopic hematoma evacuation of the enlarged accompanying ICH was performed. Other cases were treated conservatively. Because all the early hemorrhagic complications presented as the expansion of the accompanying ICH, a comparison within the accompanying ICH group was performed to analyze the risk factors for expansion. The associated risk factors for the enlargement of a pre-existing ICH were postoperative antiplatelet therapy (P = .044) and earlier initiation of coiling (9.8 ± 5.8 versus 28.1 ± 23.1 hours, P = .023) (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Characteristics and surgical outcome of the patients with early hemorrhagic complications

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Comparison of patient factors between the early hemorrhagic complications and no complications groups

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Risk factors for early hemorrhagic complications in the accompanying intracerebral hemorrhage group

Representative Case

A 31-year-old woman presented with severe headache and disturbance of consciousness (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade IV). Cerebral angiography revealed a left internal carotid–anterior choroidal artery bifurcation aneurysm with a maximum diameter of 4.5 mm (Fig 1A). With the patient under systemic heparinization with injection of 4000 U of heparin, coil embolization was performed by using the balloon-assist technique. After the placement of 4 bare platinum coils, we found a small thrombus (Fig 1B); after the administration of 100 mg of aspirin and the addition of 1000 U of heparin, the thrombus disappeared and 3 additional coils were added to achieve complete occlusion. Her preoperative head CT showed massive subarachnoid hemorrhage with lobar hemorrhage of the left temporal tip (Fig 1C). Postprocedural head CT showed enlargement of the existing left temporal lobar hemorrhage compared with the preoperative CT (Fig 1D). Fortunately, she fully recovered with minor sequelae and resumed her previous activities (modified Rankin Scale 1).

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Representative case. Cerebral angiography reveals a left internal carotid–anterior choroidal artery bifurcation aneurysm (A) and a small thrombus, indicated by the arrow after placement of coils (B). Head CT on admission shows a subarachnoid hemorrhage with lobar hemorrhage (C). Head CT after the procedure does not show any leakage of contrast, but enlargement of the existing parenchymal temporal lobar hemorrhage is observed (D).

Discussion

The greatest risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with endovascular coil treatment of aneurysms is during the initial 48 hours.7 Reducing early hemorrhagic complications may produce better clinical outcomes following coiling.

In our study, no patient showed early hemorrhagic complications defined as SAH even in the case of intraoperative perforations. All complications involved the expansion of the pre-existing hematomas. Some reports have stated that early hemorrhagic complications are possible even when the treatment of a patient appears to be successful on angiography.8 We speculated that early hemorrhagic complications may be caused by mechanisms other than arterial bleeding from the coiled ruptured aneurysm. The term “acute rebleeding” may limit the situations involving the rerupture of the aneurysm. Therefore, we referred to these cases as those involving “early hemorrhagic complications.”

In our study, the presence of ICH and postoperative antiplatelet therapy were identified as risk factors. Jartti et al9 evaluated 194 patients with SAH and found that early rehemorrhage appeared as an enlargement of the initial ICH in all these patients. Dmytriw et al10 reported a series of 137 cases with ruptured aneurysms that underwent endovascular treatment and 2 cases with early hemorrhagic complications (1.4%) for which one received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and both received acetylsalicylic acid. Egashira et al11 reported the results in the endovascular treatment of 101 consecutive cases with SAH and found that 14 (13.9%) had hematoma growth unrelated to aneurysmal rebleeding. The other reported risk factors for early hemorrhagic complications after coiling are an occurrence of a residual aneurysm at the end of a coiling procedure,12 an intra-arterial infusion of abciximab or tirofiban,3 and maintenance of anticoagulation after the procedure.3 Antiplatelet therapy may inhibit the hemostasis process of the existing ICH. The presence of intraoperative thrombus formation was also a risk factor, which may be because of subsequent antiplatelet therapy. The incidence of early hemorrhagic complications has been reported as 1%, even after angiographically successful coiling.8 In our study, there was no significant difference in packing density between the groups.

The presence of ICH is a predictor of unfavorable outcome of SAH,13 especially hematoma growth without aneurysmal rebleeding.11 As reported previously,11 ultra-early embolization performed within 6 hours of onset was a risk factor for early hemorrhagic complications. An earlier intervention led to an earlier initiation of anticoagulation therapy and may have promoted expansion of the existing ICH. Intentional delay in performing coiling may be considered, but because early aneurysmal rebleeding is associated with very poor outcomes, urgent prevention is recommended.1 Therefore, if treatment can be initiated earlier than 24 hours in cases with accompanying ICH, clipping and evacuation of the hematoma may be a better approach. If coiling is selected, it should be performed without antiplatelet therapy, and clot evacuation should be performed subsequently to prevent the risk of early hemorrhagic complications. Endoscopic aspiration of hematomas was reported to improve outcomes14,15 and may be preferred over craniotomy, as in our single case.

Some researchers reported that intraprocedural perforations have appeared to be associated with relatively high rates of morbidity and mortality.16,17 Other researchers have reported that new neurologic deficits directly associated with aneurysm perforation were found in only 20% of cases with leakage of contrast.18 In our study, 4 intraoperative perforations occurred, but these were not a significant risk factor for either early hemorrhagic complications or worse clinical outcomes. If we found intraoperative perforation, we quickly reversed heparin and lowered the blood pressure. We never pulled back the protruded coil or microcatheter. We rapidly coiled from that point, and the perforated portion was closed in a few minutes. With this method, fortunately, we saw no increase in the incidence of SAH. Aneurysm perforation may not necessarily be associated with worse clinical outcome.

Thromboembolic complications and postoperative antiplatelet therapy were identified as risk factors for early hemorrhagic complications. From a technical point of view, it is better to avoid overly aggressive coiling, which may lead to these complications. Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants have been suggested as risk factors for the early expansion of spontaneous ICH.19,20 Even if apparent thromboembolic complications followed, postoperative antiplatelet therapy may be more hazardous in cases with accompanying ICH.

A limitation of this study was its retrospective nature, which made it impossible to determine whether the factors affecting early hemorrhagic complications were causes of or simply results associated with early complications after coiling. In addition, because we avoided coiling in patients with large ICHs with widespread effects, over- or underestimation of the importance of ICH as it relates to the risk of postcoiling hemorrhage may have occurred. However, our results may be helpful in determining the clinical steps that should be taken for patients who undergo coiling for ruptured aneurysms, particularly those with accompanying ICH.

Conclusions

We analyzed early hemorrhagic complications after coiling to treat ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Accompanying ICH, thromboembolic complications, postoperative antiplatelet therapy, and earlier initiation of coiling were identified as risk factors. In patients for whom there is a high probability of early hemorrhagic complications, clipping and/or clot evacuation may be selected.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Tsuyoshi Ohta—UNRELATED: Payment for Lectures (including service on Speakers Bureaus): Kaneka, Stryker, Comments: paid for lectures on device training.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Connolly E Jr.,
    2. Rabinstein AA,
    3. Carhuapoma JR, et al
    . Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2012;43:1711–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Molyneux A,
    2. Kerr R,
    3. Stratton I, et al
    . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cho YD,
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Seo JH, et al
    . Early recurrent hemorrhage after coil embolization in ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2012;54:719–26
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. J Neurosurg 1988;68:985–86
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Heuer GG,
    2. Smith MJ,
    3. Elliott JP, et al
    . Relationship between intracranial pressure and other clinical variables in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2004;101:408–16
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Farrell B,
    2. Godwin J,
    3. Richards S, et al
    . The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54:1044–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Peltz J,
    3. da Costa L, et al
    . Clinical and angiographic follow-up of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1035–40
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kang DH,
    2. Kim YS,
    3. Baik SK, et al
    . Acute serious rebleeding after angiographically successful coil embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochir 2010;152:771–81
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jartti P,
    2. Isokangas JM,
    3. Karttunen A, et al
    . Early rebleeding after coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Acta Radiol 2010;51:1043–49
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dmytriw AA,
    2. Pickett GE,
    3. Shankar JJ
    . Rupture of aneurysms in the immediate post-coiling period. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:16–18
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Egashira Y,
    2. Yoshimura S,
    3. Enomoto Y, et al
    . Ultra-early endovascular embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysm and the increased risk of hematoma growth unrelated to aneurysmal rebleeding. J Neurosurg 2013;118:1003–08
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Klompenhouwer EG,
    2. Dings JT,
    3. van Oostenbrugge RJ, et al
    . Single-center experience of surgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:570–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Güresir E,
    2. Beck J,
    3. Vatter H, et al
    . Subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracerebral hematoma: incidence, prognostic factors, and outcome. Neurosurgery 2008;63:1088–93, discussion 1093–94
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Nagasaka T,
    2. Tsugeno M,
    3. Ikeda H, et al
    . Early recovery and better evacuation rate in neuroendoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a multifunctional cannula: preliminary study in comparison with craniotomy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;20:208–13
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Y Nievas MC,
    2. Toktamis S,
    3. Haas E, et al
    . Benefits of adapting minimal invasive techniques to selected patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematomas. Neurol Res 2005;27:755–61
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ryu CW,
    2. Lee CY,
    3. Koh JS, et al
    . Vascular perforation during coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm: the incidence, mechanism, and clinical outcome. Neurointervention 2011;6:17–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Zang P,
    2. Liang C,
    3. Shi Q, et al
    . Intraprocedural cerebral aneurysm rupture during endovascular coiling. Neurol India 2011;59:369–72
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kwon BJ,
    2. Chang HW,
    3. Youn SW, et al
    . Intracranial aneurysm perforation during endosaccular coiling: impact on clinical outcome, initial occlusion, and recanalization rates. Neurosurgery 2008;63:676–82, discussion 682–83
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Naidech AM,
    2. Jovanovic B,
    3. Liebling S, et al
    . Reduced platelet activity is associated with early clot growth and worse 3-month outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2009;40:2398–401
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Flibotte JJ,
    2. Hagan N,
    3. O'Donnell J, et al
    . Warfarin, hematoma expansion, and outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2004;63:1059–64
    CrossRef
  • Received March 9, 2014.
  • Accepted after revision May 19, 2014.
  • © 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 35 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 35, Issue 11
1 Nov 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk Factors for Early Hemorrhagic Complications after Endovascular Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
T. Ohta, K. Murao, K. Miyake, K. Takemoto, K. Nakazawa
Risk Factors for Early Hemorrhagic Complications after Endovascular Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2014, 35 (11) 2136-2139; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4033

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Risk Factors for Early Hemorrhagic Complications after Endovascular Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
T. Ohta, K. Murao, K. Miyake, K. Takemoto, K. Nakazawa
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2014, 35 (11) 2136-2139; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4033
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • A hybrid operating room for combined surgical and endovascular procedures for cerebrovascular diseases: a clinical experience at a single centre
    Euidon Choi, Jong Young Lee, Hong Jun Jeon, Byung-Moon Cho, Dae Young Yoon
    British Journal of Neurosurgery 2019 33 5
  • Four-Year Experience Using an Advanced Interdisciplinary Hybrid Operating Room : Potentials in Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease
    Hong Jun Jeon, Jong Young Lee, Byung-Moon Cho, Dae Young Yoon, Sae-Moon Oh
    Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2019 62 1
  • Intracranial hemorrhagic events associated with flow diversion treatment: a retrospective analysis from a single academic institution
    Aryan Wadhwa, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda, Jean Filo, Thomas B. Fodor, Daniel Sconzo, Michael Young, Sandeep Muram, Justin H. Granstein, Max Shutran, Philipp Taussky, Christopher S. Ogilvy
    Neurosurgical Review 2025 48 1

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Delayed Reperfusion Post-Thrombectomy&Thrombolysis
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire