Toward Patient-Tailored Perfusion Thresholds for Prediction of Stroke Outcome

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Konstas AA,
   2. Wintermark M,
   3. Lev MH

   . CT perfusion imaging in acute stroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2011;21:215–38, ix

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Kamalian S,
   2. Konstas AA,
   3. Maas MB,
   4. et al

   . CT perfusion mean transit time maps optimally distinguish benign oligemia from true “at-risk” ischemic penumbra, but thresholds vary by postprocessing technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:545–49

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Dani KA,
   2. Thomas RG,
   3. Chappell FM,
   4. et al

   . Computed tomography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in ischemic stroke: definitions and thresholds. Ann Neurol 2011;70:384–401

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Kwiatkowski TG,
   2. Libman RB,
   3. Frankel M,
   4. et al

   . Effects of tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke at one year. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1781–87

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. De Silva DA,
   2. Ebinger M,
   3. Davis SM

   . Gender issues in acute stroke thrombolysis. J Clin Neurosci 2009;16:501–04

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Adams HP Jr.,
   2. Adams RJ,
   3. Brott T,
   4. et al

   . Guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the Stroke Council of the American Stroke Association. Stroke 2003;34:1056–83

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Sillanpaa N,
   2. Saarinen JT,
   3. Rusanen H,
   4. et al

   . The clot burden score, the Boston Acute Stroke Imaging Scale, the cerebral blood volume ASPECTS, and two novel imaging parameters in the prediction of clinical outcome of ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy. Neuroradiology 2012;54:663–72

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Bruno A,
   2. Biller J,
   3. Adams HP Jr.,
   4. et al

   . Acute blood glucose level and outcome from ischemic stroke. Neurology 1999;52:280–84

   CrossRef
9. 9.↵
   1. Tan IY,
   2. Demchuk AM,
   3. Hopyan J,
   4. et al

   . CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:525–31

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Saposnik G,
    2. Fang J,
    3. Kapral MK,
    4. et al

    . The iScore predicts effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43:1315–22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Fargen KM,
    2. Chaudry I,
    3. Turner RD,
    4. et al

    . A novel clinical and imaging based score for predicting outcome prior to endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(suppl 1):i38–i43

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Barber PA,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Zhang J,
    4. et al

    . Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy: ASPECTS Study Group—Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Murphy BD,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. et al

    . Identification of penumbra and infarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006;37:1771–77

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Cnaan A,
    2. Laird NM,
    3. Slasor P

    . Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat Med 1997;16:2349–80

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Wu O,
    2. Koroshetz WJ,
    3. Ostergaard L,
    4. et al

    . Predicting tissue outcome in acute human cerebral ischemia using combined diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging. Stroke 2001;32:933–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Wu O,
    2. Sumii T,
    3. Asahi M,
    4. et al

    . Infarct prediction and treatment assessment with MRI-based algorithms in experimental stroke models. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:196–204

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Efron B

    . Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 1979;7:1–26

    CrossRefWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Lansberg MG,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Christensen S,
    4. et al

    . RAPID automated patient selection for reperfusion therapy: a pooled analysis of the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET) and the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) Study. Stroke 2011;42:1608–14

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Campbell BC,
    2. Christensen S,
    3. Levi CR,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core. Stroke 2011;42:3435–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Kamalian S,
    2. Maas MB,
    3. Goldmacher GV,
    4. et al

    . CT cerebral blood flow maps optimally correlate with admission diffusion-weighted imaging in acute stroke but thresholds vary by postprocessing platform. Stroke 2011;42:1923–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Flanders AE,
    3. Velthuis B,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37:979–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Reid JM,
    2. Gubitz GJ,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al

    . Predicting functional outcome after stroke by modelling baseline clinical and CT variables. Age Ageing 2010;39:360–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Lam WW,
    2. Leung TW,
    3. Chu WC,
    4. et al

    . Hyperacute extensive middle cerebral artery territory infarcts: role of computed tomography in predicting outcome. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28:650–53

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Kloska SP,
    2. Dittrich R,
    3. Fischer T,
    4. et al

    . Perfusion CT in acute stroke: prediction of vessel recanalization and clinical outcome in intravenous thrombolytic therapy. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2491–98

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Cohen J

    . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillside, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1987
26. 26.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS

    . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. van Everdingen KJ,
    2. van der Grond J,
    3. Kappelle LJ,
    4. et al

    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke. Stroke 1998;29:1783–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Gaudinski MR,
    2. Henning EC,
    3. Miracle A,
    4. et al

    . Establishing final infarct volume: stroke lesion evolution past 30 days is insignificant. Stroke 2008;39:2765–68

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    Diffusion Weighted Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution Study-2 (DEFUSE-2). ClinicalTrials.gov. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01349946. Accessed May 11, 2012
30. 30.↵
    1. Rha JH,
    2. Saver JL

    . The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–73

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Soares BP,
    2. Tong E,
    3. Hom J,
    4. et al

    . Reperfusion is a more accurate predictor of follow-up infarct volume than recanalization: a proof of concept using CT in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 2010;41:e34–40

    Abstract/FREE Full Text