Effectiveness of 3D T2-Weighted FLAIR FSE Sequences with Fat Suppression for Detection of Brain MR Imaging Signal Changes in Children

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Barkhof F,
   3. Pouwels P,
   4. Wattejes M

   . The holy grail in diagnostic neuroradiology: 3T or 3D? Eur Radiol 2011;21:449–56 doi:10.1007/s00330-010-2034-x pmid:21181406

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. De Coene B,
   3. Hanjal JV,
   4. Gatehouse P, et al

   . MR of the brain using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) pulse sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:1555–64 pmid:1332459

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Kallmes D,
   3. Hui FK,
   4. Mugler JP 3rd.

   . Suppression of cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow artifacts in FLAIR MR imaging with a single-slab three-dimensional pulse sequence: initial experience. Radiology 2001;221:251–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.2211001712 pmid:11568348

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Naganawa S,
   3. Kawai H,
   4. Fakatsu H, et al

   . High speed imaging at 3 Tesla: a technical and clinical review with an emphasis on whole-brain 3D imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004;3:177–87 doi:10.2463/mrms.3.177 pmid:16093636

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Lummel N,
   3. Schoepf V,
   4. Burke M, et al

   . 3D Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging: reduced CSF artifacts and enhanced sensitivity and specificity for subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2054–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2682 pmid:21920855

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Kakeda S,
   3. Korogi Y,
   4. Hiai Y, et al

   . Pitfalls of 3D brain imaging: a prospective comparison with 2D FLAIR. Acad Radiol 2012;19:1225–32 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.017 pmid:22818791

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Frigon C,
   3. Shaw DW,
   4. Heckbert SR, et al

   . Supplemental oxygen causes increased signal intensity in subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid on brain FLAIR MR images obtained in children during general anesthesia. Radiology 2004;233:51–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.2331031375 pmid:15454616

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Ozcan U,
   3. Isik U,
   4. Ozpinar A, et al

   . Assessment of sedated pediatric brain with 3D-FLAIR sequence at 3T MRI. Brain Dev 2015;37:495–500 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2014.08.008 pmid:25282484

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Lavdas E,
   3. Tsougos I,
   4. Kogia S, et al

   . T2 FLAIR artifacts at 3-T brain magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2014;38:85–90 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.10.004 pmid:24359643

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Murakami J,
    3. Weinberger E,
    4. Shaw DW

    . Normal myelination of the pediatric brain imaged with fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1406–11 pmid:10512220

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Dubois J,
    3. Dehaene-Lambertz G,
    4. Kulikova S, et al

    . The early development of brain white matter: a review of imaging studies in fetuses, newborns and infants. Neuroscience 2014;276:48–71 doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.044 pmid:24378955

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Cohen J

    . Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scale disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213–20 doi:10.1037/h0026256 pmid:19673146

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Mugler J

    . Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:745–67 doi:10.1002/jmri.24542 pmid:24399498

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Naganawa S

    . The technical and clinical features of 3D-FLAIR in neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2015;14:93–106 doi:10.2463/mrms.2014-0132 pmid:25833275

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Bink A,
    3. Schmitt M,
    4. Gaa J, et al

    . Detection of lesion in multiple sclerosis by 2D FLAIR and single-slab 3D FLAIR sequences at 3.0 T: initial results. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1104–10 doi:10.1007/s00330-005-0107-z pmid:16425026

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Kitajima M,
    3. Hirai T,
    4. Shigematsu Y, et al

    . Comparison of 3D FLAIR, 2D FLAIR, and 2D T2-weighted MR imaging of brain stem anatomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:922–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2874 pmid:22268088

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Yoshida A,
    3. Tha KK,
    4. Fujima N, et al

    . Detection of brain metastases by 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T: comparison between T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin echo acquisition and 3-dimensional T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013;37:84–90 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318271f216 pmid:23321838

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Saini J,
    3. Singh A,
    4. Kesavadas C, et al

    . Role of three-dimensional fluid attenuated inversion-recovery (3D FLAIR) and proton density magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and evaluation of lesion extent of focal cortical dysplasia in patients with refractory epilepsy. Acad Radiol 2010;51:218–25 doi:10.3109/02841850903433805 pmid:20144146

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Paniagua-Bravo A,
    3. Sánchez Hernández JJ,
    4. Ibáñez Sanz L, et al

    . A comparative MRI study for white matter hyperintensities detection: 2D-FLAIR, FSE PD 2D, 3D FLAIR and FLAIR MIP. Br J Radiol 2014;87:20130360 doi:10.1259/bjr.20130360 pmid:24588665

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Patzig M,
    3. Burke M,
    4. Brückmann H, et al

    . Comparison of 3D cube FLAIR with 2D FLAIR for multiple sclerosis imaging at 3 Tesla. Rofo 2014;186:484–88 doi:10.1055/s-0033-1355896 pmid:24347360

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Tan IL,
    3. Powels PJ,
    4. van Schijndel RA, et al

    . Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2002;12:559–67 doi:10.1007/s00330-001-1170-8 pmid:11870470

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Tschampa HJ,
    3. Urbach H,
    4. Malter M, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of focal cortical dysplasia: comparison of 3D and 2D fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences at 3T. Epilepsy Res 2015;16:8–14 doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.07.004pmid:1187047026354162

    CrossRefPubMed