Peeking into the Black Box of Coregistration in Clinical fMRI: Which Registration Methods Are Used and How Well Do They Perform?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Grosu AL,
   3. Lachner R,
   4. Wiedenmann N, et al

   . Validation of a method for automatic image fusion (BrainLAB System) of CT data and 11C-methionine-PET data for stereotactic radiotherapy using a LINAC: first clinical experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;56:1450–63 doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00279-7 pmid:12873691

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Sundar H,
   3. Shen D,
   4. Biros G, et al

   . Robust computation of mutual information using spatially adaptive meshes. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2007;10(Pt 1):950–58 pmid:18051150

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Cox R,
   3. Saad Z,
   4. Glen D, et al

   . False sense of EPI-to-structural alignment with common cross-modality registration methods. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Melbourne, Australia. June 15–19, 2008; 501
4. 4.↵
   2. Saad ZS,
   3. Glen DR,
   4. Chen G, et al

   . A new method of improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation. Neuroimage 2009;44:839–48 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.037 pmid:18976717

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Maintz JB,
   3. Viergever MA

   . A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 1998;2:1–36 pmid:10638851

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Zitova B,
   3. Flusser J

   . Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 2003;21:977–1000 doi:10.1016/S0262-8856(03)00137-9

   CrossRefWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Gholipour A,
   3. Kehtarnavaz N,
   4. Briggs R, et al

   . Brain functional localization: a survey of image registration techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:427–51 doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.892508 pmid:17427731

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Krishnan R,
   3. Raabe A,
   4. Hattingen E, et al

   . Functional magnetic resonance imaging-integrated neuronavigation: correlation between lesion-to-motor cortex distance and outcome. Neurosurgery 2004;55:904–15; discussion 914–15 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000137331.35014.5C pmid:15458599

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Kundu B,
   3. Penwarden A,
   4. Wood JM, et al

   . Association of functional magnetic resonance imaging indices with postoperative language outcomes in patients with primary brain tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2013;34:E6 doi:10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS12413 pmid:23544412

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Wood JM,
    3. Kundu B,
    4. Utter A, et al

    . Impact of brain tumor location on morbidity and mortality: a retrospective functional MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1420–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2679 pmid:21885713

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Bailey PD,
    3. Zacà D,
    4. Basha MM, et al

    . Presurgical fMRI and DTI for the prediction of perioperative motor and language deficits in primary or metastatic brain lesions. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:776–84 doi:10.1111/jon.12273 pmid:26173383

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Yetkin FZ,
    3. Mueller WM,
    4. Morris GL, et al

    . Functional MR activation correlated with intraoperative cortical mapping. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1311–15 pmid:9282861

    Abstract
13. 13.↵
    2. Pluim JP,
    3. Maintz JB,
    4. Viergever MA

    . F-information measures in medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23:1508–16 doi:10.1109/TMI.2004.836872 pmid:15575408

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Pluim JP,
    3. Maintz JB,
    4. Viergever MA

    . F-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:986–1004 doi:10.1109/TMI.2003.815867 pmid:12906253

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Greve DN,
    3. Fischl B

    . Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration. Neuroimage 2009;48:63–72 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.060 pmid:19573611

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Villain N,
    3. Landeau B,
    4. Groussard M, et al

    . A simple way to improve anatomical mapping of functional brain imaging. J Neuroimaging 2010;20:324–33 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00470.x pmid:20331499

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Studholme C,
    3. Constable RT,
    4. Duncan JS

    . Accurate alignment of functional EPI data to anatomical MRI using a physics-based distortion model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000;19:1115–27 doi:10.1109/42.896788 pmid:11204849

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Renvall V,
    3. Witzel T,
    4. Wald LL, et al

    . Automatic cortical surface reconstruction of high-resolution T1 echo planar imaging data. Neuroimage 2016;134:338–54 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.004 pmid:27079529

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Gholipour A,
    3. Kehtarnavaz N,
    4. Briggs RW, et al

    . Validation of non-rigid registration between functional and anatomical magnetic resonance brain images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008;55:563–71 doi:10.1109/TBME.2007.912641 pmid:18269991

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Shan ZY,
    3. Mateja SJ,
    4. Reddick WE, et al

    . Retrospective evaluation of PET-MRI registration algorithms. J Digit Imaging 2011;24:485–93 doi:10.1007/s10278-010-9300-y pmid:20437075

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science