Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleInterventional
Open Access

Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Rate According to Arterial Anatomies Depend on the Hemodynamic Environment

S. Fukuda, Y. Shimogonya and N. Yonemoto on behalf of the CFD ABO Study Group
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 834-839; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6030
S. Fukuda
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (S.F.), National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Fukuda
Y. Shimogonya
bCollege of Engineering (Y.S.), Nihon University, Koriyama, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Shimogonya
N. Yonemoto
cDepartment of Biostatistics (N.Y.), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Yonemoto
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebral aneurysms have significantly different rupture rates depending on their size and location. The mechanisms underlying these differences are unclear. We examined whether anatomic rupture risks are dependent on the hemodynamic environment on the aneurysmal surface.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient-specific geometries and flow rates of 84 cerebral aneurysms (42 anterior communicating artery and 42 MCA aneurysms) were acquired from our clinical study, the Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Blood Flow in Cerebral Aneurysms: Prospective Observational Study. Pulsatile blood flow was simulated to calculate hemodynamic metrics with special attention to wall shear stress magnitude and temporal disturbance. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between hemodynamic metrics and known rupture predictors (age, sex, hypertension, smoking history, location, and size).

RESULTS: All the wall shear stress magnitude–based metrics showed a significant negative association with size and location (P < .03), but not other risk factors. All the wall shear stress disturbance–based metrics were significantly related to size (P < .001). Only normalized transverse wall shear stress, a metric for multidirectional wall shear stress disturbance, was related to location (P = .03). The normalized transverse wall shear stress had the highest odds ratio for location and size among hemodynamic metrics (odds ratios, 1.275 and 1.579; 95% confidence intervals, 1.020–1.693 and 1.238–2.219, respectively). Among the arterial geometric parameters, the aspect ratio had the second strongest association with all hemodynamic metrics, after our newly proposed aspect ratio–asphericity index.

CONCLUSIONS: The differences in aneurysm rupture rates according to size and location may reflect differences in hemodynamic environments in qualitatively different ways. An enhanced multidirectional wall shear stress disturbance may be especially associated with aneurysm rupture.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AAI
aspect ratio–asphericity index
AcomA
anterior communicating artery
β
regression coefficient
CFD
computational fluid dynamics
GON
gradient oscillatory number
NtransWSS
normalized transverse wall shear stress
NWSS
normalized wall shear stress
NWSSG
normalized wall shear stress gradient
OSI
oscillatory shear index
TAWSS
time-averaged wall shear stress
TAWSSG
time-averaged wall shear stress gradient
WSS
wall shear stress

Cerebral aneurysm rupture is a major cause of life-threatening SAH, with high mortality and disability rates. Although several known risk factors exist, including size, location, sex, age, history of hypertension, and smoking, it remains difficult to predict which cerebral aneurysms are more likely to rupture.1⇓⇓–4 New predictors of cerebral aneurysm rupture are thus needed.

Aneurysm ruptures are mainly attributable to the biologic process of the progressive degradation of vessel wall structure and strength, in which hemodynamic stress and inflammation are thought to be closely involved.1,5⇓–7 We have focused on the role of hemodynamics and are using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques to clarify hemodynamics-related factors of cerebral aneurysm ruptures. We are currently conducting the Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Blood Flow in Cerebral Aneurysms: Prospective Observational Study (the CFD ABO Study) as a multi-institutional prospective observational clinical study of the National Hospital Organization in Japan (UMIN000013584). Individual flow rates and arterial geometries were acquired from 461 registered patients to provide realistic patient-specific CFD models.

Among the known predictors of rupture, cerebral artery anatomic parameters such as size and location are the most significant.1⇓⇓–4 The rupture rate of aneurysms with sizes of 7–10 mm is approximately 3 times higher than that of 3–5 mm aneurysms.2 The rupture rate of anterior communicating artery (AcomA) aneurysms is approximately twice that of MCA aneurysms.2 Several researchers have reported that low wall shear stress (WSS) and disturbed WSS are significantly associated with aneurysm rupture.1,6,8,9 However, the relationships between these anatomic risk factors and the hemodynamic environment and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. A better understanding of these phenomena could improve the prediction of aneurysm ruptures.

Given the above-described background, we hypothesized that rupture risks based on arterial anatomic parameters are determined by the hemodynamics—that is, the hemodynamic environment on the aneurysmal surface may vary depending on the size and location of the aneurysm, and changes in the hemodynamic environments may cause differences in the rupture-risk rate. We examined the associations between known risk factors and hemodynamic metrics on the aneurysmal surface, and we considered the mechanisms from the point of view of fluid mechanics. We applied CFD and multivariate analysis to 84 cases of bifurcation-type aneurysms located at 2 representative and frequently involved sites, the MCA and AcomA, from the CFD ABO Study. We also explored which geometry-related metrics of aneurysms (among size and 8 other known geometric parameters) were best correlated with the detected hemodynamics metrics.

Materials and Methods

See the On-line Appendix for details of the CFD ABO study methodology.

Data Sources

3D-CTA images and patient-specific physiologic data, including the flow rate, were acquired from patients who consented to participate in either the CFD ABO Study approved by the National Hospital Organization, Japan, or the pilot study approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kyoto Medical Center, Japan. We analyzed 84 bifurcation-type aneurysms (42 AcomA and 42 MCA aneurysms). A flow chart of the method used is provided in On-line Fig 1.

CFD Modeling and Postprocessing

Pulsatile blood flow was simulated using the CFD software package ANSYS CFX (ANSYS, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania). We then calculated 7 hemodynamic metrics and 9 geometric parameters during postprocessing for use in statistical analyses. The CFD modeling and postprocessing details are described in the On-line Appendix.

Statistical Analysis

The continuous data are reported as means ± SDs and were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to investigate the influence of known risk factors for rupture—ie, size (the maximum diameter of the cerebral aneurysm), location (AcomA versus MCA), sex, age, history of hypertension and smoking—on the 7 hemodynamic metrics: the time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), normalized WSS (NWSS), time-averaged WSS gradient (TAWSSG), normalized WSS gradient (NWSSG), oscillatory shear index (OSI), gradient oscillatory number (GON), and normalized transverse WSS (NtransWSS).

We performed a multivariate logistic analysis to determine the effects of the 7 hemodynamic metrics on size (<7 versus ≥7 mm) and location. We also performed a multivariate regression analysis to determine the associations between the known arterial geometric parameters and hemodynamic metrics after adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, smoking history, and aneurysm location. The rationales for risk-factor selection are described in the On-line Appendix. We computed regression coefficients with 95% CIs and P values for the models. Differences with P < .05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed using JMP, Version 11.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Results

Characteristics

The case characteristics are summarized in the Table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Characteristics of the cases with cerebral aneurysmsa

Association of Known Rupture Risk Factors with Hemodynamic Metrics

To investigate whether known rupture risk factors are hemodynamically involved in rupture, we examined the association between each rupture risk factor and hemodynamic metrics using a multivariate regression analysis (On-line Table 1 and On-line Fig 3). The size and WSS magnitude–based metrics, TAWSS, NWSS, TAWSSG, and NWSSG, were significantly negatively correlated, indicated by the following: TAWSS regression coefficient (β), −0.561 (95% CI, −1.064 to −0.058) P = .02; NWSS β, −0.867 (95% CI, −1.510 to −0.224) P = .008; TAWSSG β, −0.868 (95% CI, −1.486 to −0.249) P = .006; NWSSG β, −3.22 (95% CI, −5.16 to −1.28) P = .001. The WSS disturbance–based metrics, OSI, GON, and NtransWSS, were significantly positively correlated as indicated by the following: OSI β, 0.00332 (95% CI, 0.00191–0.00472) P < .001; GON β, 0.0145 (95% CI, 0.0097–0.0193) P < .001; NtransWSS β, 0.0145 (95% CI, 0.0089–0.0200) P < .001.

In contrast, a significant negative association was observed between the location (MCA versus AcomA aneurysms) and each of the WSS magnitude–based metrics: TAWSS β, −1.82 (95% CI, −2.84 to −0.80) P < .001; NWSS β, −2.45 (95% CI, −3.75 to −1.15) P < .001; TAWSSG β, −2.05 (95% CI, −3.31 to −0.80) P = .001; NWSSG β, −6.91 (95% CI, −10.84 to −2.98) P < .001. A significant positive association with the location was found in only NtransWSS as a metric for multidirectional WSS disturbance among all of the WSS disturbance–based metrics examined (β, 0.0119; 95% CI, 0.0006–0.0232; P = .03).

Association of Hemodynamic Metrics with the Size and Location of Cerebral Aneurysms

Using a multivariate logistic analysis, we sought to identify which hemodynamic metric was most strongly related to the size (<7 versus ≥7 mm) and location in which significant hemodynamic involvement was observed. Although all of the hemodynamic metrics showed a significant association with both size and location, the NtransWSS had the highest OR and the strongest association with both size (OR, 1.579; 95% CI, 1.238–2.128) and location (OR, 1.275; 95% CI, 1.020–1.639) (On-line Table 1).

Association between Aneurysm Arterial Geometric Parameters and Hemodynamic Metrics

Several arterial geometric parameters have been reported as predictors of aneurysm rupture, such as size, size ratio, and aspect ratio. We therefore examined which arterial geometric parameter most strongly reflects each hemodynamic metric by performing a multivariate regression analysis. Among the known arterial geometric rupture risk factors, the aspect ratio showed the strongest association with all hemodynamic metrics as shown in On-line Table 2: TAWSS β, −2.46 (95% CI, −5.12 to −0.21) P = .07; NWSS β, −3.20 (95% CI, −6.65 to 0.25) P = .06; TAWSSG β, −2.92 (95% CI, −6.26 to −0.42) P = .08; NWSSG β, −10.5 (95% CI, −21.1 to −0.2) P = .05; OSI β, 0.00799 (95% CI, 0.00017–0.01616) P = .05; GON β, 0.0352 (95% CI, 0.0057–0.0648) P = .02; NtransWSS β, 0.0379 (95% CI, 0.0052–0.0707) P = .02.

However, the aspect ratio–asphericity index (AAI), our newly proposed geometric parameter, was more strongly correlated with all the hemodynamic metrics than the aspect ratio: TAWSS β, −4.02 (95% CI, −8.23 to −0.19) P = .06; NWSS β, −5.46 (95% CI, −10.90 to −0.01) P = .04; TAWSSG β, −4.72 (95% CI, −9.99 to −0.56) P = .07; NWSSG β, −17.3 (95% CI, −34.0 to −0.5) P = .04; OSI β, 0.0121 (95% CI, 0.0008–0.0250) P = .06; GON β, 0.0559 (95% CI, 0.0092–0.1027) P = .01; NtransWSS β, 0.0558 (95% CI, 0.0038–0.1079) P = .03. Here, AAI is defined as (H / N) × (d2 / S), where H is the height, N the neck width, d the size, and S the surface area.

Differences in Flow Rates in Parent Vessels and Size between the AcomA and MCA Aneurysms

The anterior cerebral artery flow rate (90.9 ± 41.9 mL/min) was significantly lower than the MCA flow rate (123.0 ± 50.9 mL/min) (P < .001; On-line Table 3). The size was slightly, but not significantly, larger in the AcomA aneurysms (5.82 ± 2.10 mm) than the MCA aneurysms (5.46 ± 2.00 mm).

Differences in Flow Rates in Parent Vessels and Size Between the 2 Different Size Groups

The parent vessel flow rate was not significantly different between the large (≥7 mm; 92.2 ± 41.9 mL/min) and small aneurysm groups (<7 mm; 112.8 ± 50.8 mL/min; On-line Table 4). The size was significantly greater in the large (8.28 ± 1.16 mm) than in the small (4.58 ± 1.17 mm) aneurysm group (P < .001).

Differences in Hemodynamic Metrics between Size Groups with a Threshold of 5 or 7 mm

Using a multivariate regression analysis, we examined the differences in hemodynamic metrics between the 2 different size groups with a threshold of 5 or 7 mm (On-line Table 5). The WSS magnitude–based metrics and size were better correlated in the 5- than the 7-mm threshold (β, 5 versus 7 mm; TAWSS, −1.27 versus −1.20; NWSS, −2.37 versus −1.48; TAWSSG, −1.89 versus −1.70; NWSSG, −7.97 versus −5.20), whereas in the WSS disturbance–based metrics, the association was stronger in the 7- than the 5-mm threshold (β, 5 versus 7 mm; OSI, 0.00367 versus 0.00648; GON, 0.0207 versus 0.0260; NtransWSS, 0.0176 versus 0.0274).

Flow Rates and TAWSS on the ICA in MCA Aneurysm Cases

In the MCA aneurysm cases, both the flow rate and the TAWSS on the ICA on the side where the aneurysm was present were significantly higher in the large (≥5 mm) than the small (<5 mm) aneurysm group (P = .03 and .03, respectively; On-line Table 6).

Discussion

Hemodynamics is likely involved in cerebral aneurysm ruptures, and some of the rupture predictors become significant risk factors due to the influence of hemodynamics.1,5⇓–7 Several studies have quantitatively examined hemodynamic metrics in ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms.7,10 These reports examined the degree of association between hemodynamic metrics and aneurysm rupture and demonstrated that ruptured and unruptured aneurysms had significantly different hemodynamic characteristics.10 Therefore, it is presumed that some of the known rupture risks become significant by reflecting the influence of these hemodynamic environments. However, to our knowledge, no report has described the significance of the association between hemodynamic parameters as independent variables and the rupture risks, such as size and location, or conversely, how much the rupture risks as independent variables are related to hemodynamic environments, though several reports have examined the association between hemodynamic factors and rupture itself.7,10 Therefore, we statistically examined the mutual relationship between hemodynamic parameters and representative risk factors such as age, sex, smoking history, and hypertension in addition to size and location. This is thus the first examination of this type. The results of our analyses indicate that arterial anatomic parameters (size and location of aneurysms) and hemodynamic metrics characterizing the WSS magnitude and disturbance were significantly associated; both the associations of the arterial anatomic parameters with the hemodynamic metrics and the associations of the hemodynamic metrics with the arterial anatomic parameters were statistically significant (On-line Table 1 and On-line Fig 3), suggesting that rupture risks based on arterial anatomic parameters are determined by the hemodynamic environment.

Larger and AcomA aneurysms have higher rupture rates than smaller and MCA aneurysms, respectively.2 The present results show that the TAWSS on the aneurysmal surface was significantly negatively associated with size and location (On-line Table 1 and Figs 1 and 2 and On-line Figs 3–5). This finding is consistent with studies showing that a significant decrease in the magnitude of the WSS on the aneurysmal surface is closely associated with the aneurysm rupture status.1,6,8,9

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Comparisons of hemodynamic metrics between a representative small aneurysm (A) and a large aneurysm (B).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Comparisons of hemodynamic metrics between a representative anterior communicating artery aneurysm (A) and an MCA aneurysm (B).

This leads us to ask what mechanisms cause the WSS to become low or disturbed depending on the size and location. Are the mechanisms different between size and location? Based on the present data, we considered the mechanisms from the point of view of fluid mechanics. The finding that the TAWSS was significantly decreased on AcomA aneurysms compared with MCA aneurysms could be explained qualitatively. It is hemodynamically clear that the TAWSS on the aneurysmal surface is affected principally by the size of the aneurysm and the inflow rate into the aneurysm.11 The larger the size of the aneurysm (ie, the larger the open space inside the aneurysm) and the lower the inflow rate, the lower the TAWSS will be.

Because it was difficult to measure the inflow rate into the aneurysm for all the cases, we use the flow rate in the parent vessel, the anterior cerebral artery or MCA, in the following discussion. In our results, the anterior cerebral artery flow rate was significantly lower than the MCA flow rate, whereas the aneurysmal size showed no significant difference between the AcomA and MCA aneurysm groups (On-line Table 3). Therefore, the significant difference in TAWSS between the 2 groups was due mainly to the difference in flow rates. In contrast, the decrease in the TAWSS with increasing aneurysm size may be explained simply by the effect of size because the flow rate in the parent vessel showed no difference between the 2 size groups (On-line Table 4).

A significant positive association was observed between each of the WSS disturbance–based metrics (the OSI, GON, and NtransWSS) and the size of the aneurysm (On-line Table 1, Fig 1, and On-line Fig 4). With respect to location, however, only NtransWSS differed significantly among the different locations (On-line Table 1, Fig 2, and On-line Fig 5). These findings suggest that aneurysm size and location both contribute significantly to the hemodynamic disturbance, but in qualitatively different ways. In the present study, we defined a new metric, the NtransWSS, by dividing the nodal transverse WSS12 by the TAWSS at the same node because this normalization allowed us to compare the transverse WSS among multiple cases on the same basis. The OSI can distinguish between purely forward (low OSI) and reversing unidirectional (high OSI) flow, but the NtransWSS cannot (low NtransWSS in both cases). In contrast, the NtransWSS can distinguish between reversing unidirectional (low NtransWSS) and multidirectional (high NtransWSS) flow, but the OSI cannot (high OSI in both cases).12

It thus seems reasonable to infer that the hemodynamic environments of small and large aneurysms are characterized in part by purely forward and multidirectional WSS, respectively, because both the OSI and NtransWSS were significantly different. In contrast, the hemodynamic environment of the MCA and AcomA aneurysms may be characterized in part by reversing unidirectional and multidirectional WSS, respectively, because significant variations were observed in the NtransWSS, but not in the OSI. The more disturbed hemodynamic stress at AcomA aneurysms compared with MCA aneurysms may be because AcomA, but not MCA, aneurysms are positioned along the circle of Willis.

Among the hemodynamic metrics, the NtransWSS had the highest OR for both size and location (On-line Table 1). This suggests that rupture rates in aneurysms of different sizes and locations are most strongly influenced by the multidirectional disturbance in WSS. Several experimental studies have reported that low WSS or disturbed WSS without a clear direction, ie, multidirectional WSS, or both cause sustained molecular signaling of proinflammatory and proliferative pathways of vascular endothelial cells.13,14 The inflammatory processes in vessel walls play a critical role in the pathogenesis of cerebral aneurysms.15⇓–17 Therefore, the clinical evidence of higher rupture rates in AcomA aneurysms and larger aneurysms might be associated, in part, with the inflammation in the vessel walls enhanced by the low WSS and the multidirectionally disturbed WSS detected by the NtransWSS.7,18

Several researchers have proposed various aneurysmal geometric parameters for predicting rupture risk.19⇓–21 The use of surrogate geometric parameters of the hemodynamic environment with high rupture risk would be of great clinical value because geometric parameters can be measured more easily than hemodynamic metrics at clinical sites. We thus investigated which previously proposed geometric parameters of aneurysms best correlated with the TAWSS and NtransWSS. Our analyses revealed that the aspect ratio was most strongly correlated with both the TAWSS and NtransWSS, followed by the size ratio. The aspect ratio has been reported to play a greater role than the size in the rupture of AcomA and MCA aneurysms.19,20 The size ratio has been reported to be a useful rupture risk predictor, particularly for small aneurysms of <5 mm.21

However, the correlation between some geometric parameters, including size ratio and aspect ratio, and aneurysm rupture is still controversial.22 This is presumably because these geometric parameters only partially reflect hemodynamic environments (On-line Table 2). Therefore, we defined a novel geometric parameter, the AAI, which serves as a special refined geometric marker for the nonsphericity of aneurysmal shapes. The AAI best reflected both the TAWSS and the NtransWSS among all of the geometric parameters examined (On-line Table 2). The AAI is thus a potentially useful geometric parameter for predicting the rupture risk of aneurysms. We will validate its usefulness on completion of the ABO study. Because CFD analyses currently take time and effort, it is clinically impractical to conduct them for all unruptured aneurysm cases. Thus, the use of arterial geometric parameters may be more convenient at the clinical level. Indeed, it might be reasonable to first perform a screening with useful arterial geometric parameters and then to examine the detailed hemodynamics using a CFD analysis for essential cases.

To better understand how the hemodynamic metrics change with increasing aneurysm size, we examined the threshold size at which the hemodynamic metrics changed notably. The difference in the WSS magnitude–based metrics between the 2 different size groups with a threshold of 5 mm was larger than that with a threshold of 7 mm, whereas the difference in the WSS disturbance–based metrics between the 2 different size groups with a threshold of 7 mm was larger than that when the threshold was 5 mm (On-line Table 6). In other words, as the aneurysm size increases, the magnitude of the WSS declines first, and then the WSS disturbance occurs. Cerebral aneurysms may have at least 2 different critical sizes at which the rupture risk is heightened.

In the CFD ABO study, individual flow rates and arterial geometries have been acquired from each registered patient to provide realistic patient-specific CFD models. In most hemodynamic cohort studies using CFD analyses, the inlet boundary conditions are based on a typical flow velocity or flow rate of healthy subjects.7,18 Alternatively, in other studies, the inlet boundary conditions were set so that the mean WSS at the ICA was equal to 1.5 Pa.23 However, we found that the mean flow rate and the WSS at the ICA of the large MCA cases (≥5 mm) were significantly higher than those of the small MCA cases (<5 mm; On-line Table 6). Thus, the mean WSS at the ICA is not constant but strongly depends on characteristics of the individual case. Because such substantial differences are thought to have a non-negligible impact on hemodynamic characteristics,10 it is essential to use patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in combination with patient-specific arterial geometry in these types of statistical analyses.

The present study has some limitations. First, we did not directly measure the rupture risk, but we measured recognized risk factors for rupture. Second, it remains unclear whether the NtransWSS can further help to stratify the rupture risk of aneurysms with similar sizes and locations, though the results suggest that an enhanced NtransWSS may be strongly associated with aneurysm rupture. Third, we cannot conclude that the NtransWSS is superior to other hemodynamic metrics in terms of the risk assessment of aneurysm rupture. Fourth, only AcomA and MCA aneurysms were examined. It is unclear how the present results would change if aneurysms at other locations were included. These limitations may be resolved by a statistical hemodynamic comparison between unruptured and ruptured/enlarged aneurysms at various locations, which will be made in our ongoing clinical study.

Conclusions

In the analysis of AcomA and MCA aneurysms, the arterial anatomic parameters (size and location) and hemodynamic metrics characterizing the WSS magnitude and disturbance were significantly associated. Therefore, the differences in the rupture rate of aneurysms for various arterial anatomic parameters may reflect the differences in the hemodynamic environment. Our results also suggest that a CFD analysis is a useful simulation that matches epidemiologic data. Although both low WSS and enhanced disturbed flow may be involved in aneurysm ruptures, an enhanced disturbance of multidirectional WSS may be most strongly associated with aneurysm ruptures; the NtransWSS, a refined hemodynamic metric proposed in the present study, had the highest OR for size and location among all the examined hemodynamic metrics including OSI. Size and location had significant effects on the hemodynamic environment in qualitatively different ways; thus, the decrease in the WSS with increasing aneurysm size may be explained by the effect of size itself, whereas the significant difference in the WSS according to location may be due to the difference in the flow rate of the parent artery. Our novel geometric parameter, the AAI, may be useful for predicting the rupture risk of aneurysms.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Geert W. Schmid-Schönbein, Chair of the Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, for his valuable advice. We also thank Mr Yasuhide Imoto for his assistance.

Footnotes

  • Shunichi Fukuda and Yuji Shimogonya contributed equally to this work.

  • Disclosures: Shunichi Fukuda—RELATED: Grant: grant-in-aid from the Japanese National Hospital Organization Multi-Center Clinical Research, AMED, and a JSPS KAKENHI grant, Comments: This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Japanese National Hospital Organization Multi-Center Clinical Research, AMED, under grant No. JP15gm0810006h0301 and a JSPS KAKENHI grant No. 15K10323.

  • The CFD ABO Study Group Member List is in the On-line Appendix.

  • This work is supported by a grant-in-aid for the Japanese National Hospital Organization Multi-Center Clinical Research, AMED, under grant No. JP15gm0810006h0301, and JSPS KAKENHI grant No. 15K10323.

  • Paper previously presented, in part, at: International Stroke Conference 2018, January 23–25, 2018; Los Angeles, California.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Etminan N,
    2. Rinkel GJ
    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: development, rupture and preventive management. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:699–713 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.150 pmid:27808265
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Morita A,
    2. Kirino T,
    3. Hashi K, et al
    ; the UCAS Japan Investigators. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2474–82 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113260 pmid:22738097
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Greving JP,
    2. Wermer M,
    3. Brown RD Jr., et al
    . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 pmid:24290159
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Raschi M
    . Suggested connections between risk factors of intracranial aneurysms: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:1366–83 doi:10.1007/s10439-012-0723-0 pmid:23242844
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Kayembe KN,
    2. Sasahara M,
    3. Hazama F
    . Cerebral aneurysms and variations in the circle of Willis. Stroke 1984;15:846–50 doi:10.1161/01.STR.15.5.846 pmid:6474536
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Shimogonya Y,
    2. Fukuda S
    . Computational and experimental studies into the hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering 2016;11:15–00488 doi:10.1299/jbse.15-00488
    CrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Xiang J,
    2. Natarajan SK,
    3. Tremmel M, et al
    . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592923 pmid:21106956
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Signorelli F,
    2. Sela S,
    3. Gesualdo L, et al
    . Hemodynamic stress, inflammation, and intracranial aneurysm development and rupture: a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2018;115:234–44 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.143 pmid:29709752
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Takao H,
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Otsuka S, et al
    . Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke 2012;43:1436–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.640995 pmid:22363053
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Weir J, et al
    . Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:145–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2419 pmid:21127144
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jansen IG,
    2. Schneiders JJ,
    3. Potters WV, et al
    . Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1543–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3901 pmid:24651816
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Peiffer V,
    2. Sherwin SJ,
    3. Weinberg PD
    . Computation in the rabbit aorta of a new metric: the transverse wall shear stress—to quantify the multidirectional character of disturbed blood flow. J Biomech 2013;46:2651–58 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.003 pmid:24044966
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Aoki T,
    2. Yamamoto K,
    3. Fukuda M, et al
    . Sustained expression of MCP-1 under low wall shear stress concomitant with turbulent flow in endothelial cells of intracranial aneurysm. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2016;4:48 doi:10.1186/s40478-016-0318-3 pmid:27160403
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Chien S
    . Effects of disturbed flow on endothelial cells. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:554–62 doi:10.1007/s10439-007-9426-3 pmid:18172767
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Aoki T,
    2. Kataoka H,
    3. Shimamura M, et al
    . NF- kappaB is a key mediator of cerebral aneurysm formation. Circulation 2007;116:2830–40 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728303 pmid:18025535
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nuki Y,
    2. Tsou TL,
    3. Kurihara C, et al
    . Elastase-induced intracranial aneurysms in hypertensive mice. Hypertension 2009;54:1337–44 doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138297 pmid:19884566
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Aoki T,
    2. Fukuda M,
    3. Nishimura M, et al
    . Critical role of TNF-alpha-TNFR1 signaling in intracranial aneurysm formation. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2014;2:34 doi:10.1186/2051-5960-2-34 pmid:24685329
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Shojima M,
    2. Oshima M,
    3. Takagi K, et al
    . Magnitude and role of wall shear stress on cerebral aneurysm: computational fluid dynamic study of 20 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Stroke 2004;35:2500–05 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000144648.89172.0f pmid:15514200
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lin N,
    2. Ho A,
    3. Gross BA, et al
    . Differences in simple morphological variables in ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;117:913–19 doi:10.3171/2012.7.JNS111766 pmid:22957531
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Maiti TK,
    2. Bir SC,
    3. Patra DP, et al
    . 158 Morphological parameters for anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2016;63:163–64 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000489727.54111.8a
    CrossRef
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kashiwazaki D,
    2. Kuroda S
    ; Sapporo SAH Study Group. Size ratio can highly predict rupture risk in intracranial small (<5 mm) aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2169–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001138 pmid:23743979
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lauric A,
    2. Baharoglu MI,
    3. Gao BL, et al
    . Incremental contribution of size ratio as a discriminant for rupture status in cerebral aneurysms: comparison with size, height, and vessel diameter. Neurosurgery 2012;70:944–51; discussion 951–52 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31823bcda7 pmid:21997542
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sugiyama S,
    2. Niizuma K,
    3. Sato K, et al
    . Blood flow into basilar tip aneurysms: a predictor for recanalization after coil embolization. Stroke 2016;47:2541–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013555 pmid:27625377
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received November 26, 2018.
  • Accepted after revision March 11, 2019.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 5
1 May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Rate According to Arterial Anatomies Depend on the Hemodynamic Environment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Fukuda, Y. Shimogonya, N. Yonemoto
Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Rate According to Arterial Anatomies Depend on the Hemodynamic Environment
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 834-839; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6030

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Differences in Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture Rate According to Arterial Anatomies Depend on the Hemodynamic Environment
S. Fukuda, Y. Shimogonya, N. Yonemoto
American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 834-839; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6030
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Vascular Endothelial Cells Perform Distinct Sensing and Signaling of Laminar and Disturbed Flows across Plasma Membranes and Mitochondria
  • Crossref (14)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Risk Factors for Recanalization after Coil Embolization
    Karol Wiśniewski, Zbigniew Tyfa, Bartłomiej Tomasik, Piotr Reorowicz, Ernest J. Bobeff, Bartłomiej J. Posmyk, Marlena Hupało, Ludomir Stefańczyk, Krzysztof Jóźwik, Dariusz J. Jaskólski
    Journal of Personalized Medicine 2021 11 8
  • Disruption of P2X4 purinoceptor and suppression of the inflammation associated with cerebral aneurysm formation
    Miyuki Fukuda, Shunichi Fukuda, Joji Ando, Kimiko Yamamoto, Naohiro Yonemoto, Takashi Suzuki, Youko Niwa, Takayuki Inoue, Noriko Satoh-Asahara, Koji Hasegawa, Akira Shimatsu, Tetsuya Tsukahara
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2021 134 1
  • Hemodynamic Risk Factors for the Development of Carotid Stenosis in Patients with Unilateral Carotid Stenosis
    Shunichi Fukuda, Yuji Shimogonya, Naohiro Yonemoto, Miyuki Fukuda, Aoi Watanabe, Kazuha Fujiwara, Riku Enomoto, Koji Hasegawa, Akihiro Yasoda, Tetsuya Tsukahara, Shunichi Fukuda, Yuji Shimogonya, Naohiro Yonemoto, Shunichi Fukuda, Masayuki Ezura, Masayuki Ishihara, Hideyuki Kurihara, Hideharu Furumoto, Hirokazu Tanno, Hiroyuki Masaoka, Ryoichi Saito, Keiichi Sakai, Yasuko Odake, Katsuo Shoin, Hironori Fujisawa, Noriyuki Suzaki, Hideki Sakai, Tomonori Yamada, Yoshiki Adachi, Yasuhiro Manabe, Tsuyoshi Torii, Takashi Sadatomo, Akifumi Izumihara, Katsuhiro Yamashita, Yasushi Okada, Hiroshi Nakane, Masayuki Miyazono, Keisuke Tsutsumi, Tomohiro Takita, Yanosuke Kosaki, Yasuyuki Nagai, Koji Iihara, Tsuyoshi Izumo, Nobuyuki Sakai, Kazuhiko Suyama, Hisako Oogami, Miyuki Fukuda, Aoi Watanabe, Kazuha Fujiwara, Natsuko Nakajo, Satomi Kikuchi
    World Neurosurgery 2022 160
  • Intracranial Aneurysm Classifier Using Phenotypic Factors: An International Pooled Analysis
    Sandrine Morel, Isabel C. Hostettler, Georg R. Spinner, Romain Bourcier, Joanna Pera, Torstein R. Meling, Varinder S. Alg, Henry Houlden, Mark K. Bakker, Femke van’t Hof, Gabriel J. E. Rinkel, Tatiana Foroud, Dongbing Lai, Charles J. Moomaw, Bradford B. Worrall, Jildaz Caroff, Pacôme Constant-dits-Beaufils, Matilde Karakachoff, Antoine Rimbert, Aymeric Rouchaud, Emilia I. Gaal-Paavola, Hanna Kaukovalta, Riku Kivisaari, Aki Laakso, Behnam Rezai Jahromi, Riikka Tulamo, Christoph M. Friedrich, Jerome Dauvillier, Sven Hirsch, Nathalie Isidor, Zolt Kulcsàr, Karl O. Lövblad, Olivier Martin, Paolo Machi, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Daniel Rüfenacht, Karl Schaller, Sabine Schilling, Agnieszka Slowik, Juha E. Jaaskelainen, Mikael von und zu Fraunberg, Jordi Jiménez-Conde, Elisa Cuadrado-Godia, Carolina Soriano-Tárraga, Iona Y. Millwood, Robin G. Walters, Helen Kim, Richard Redon, Nerissa U. Ko, Guy A. Rouleau, Antti Lindgren, Mika Niemelä, Hubert Desal, Daniel Woo, Joseph P. Broderick, David J. Werring, Ynte M. Ruigrok, Philippe Bijlenga
    Journal of Personalized Medicine 2022 12 9
  • Endothelial cells differentially sense laminar and disturbed flows by altering the lipid order of their plasma and mitochondrial membranes
    Kimiko Yamamoto, Yuji Shimogonya, Ryohei Maeno, Kenshiroh Kawabe, Joji Ando
    American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 2023 325 6
  • The Hemodynamics of Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverting Stents Considering both Stent and Aneurysm/Artery Geometries
    Paulo R. Cillo-Velasco, Rafaello D. Luciano, Michael E. Kelly, Lissa Peeling, Donald J. Bergstrom, Xiongbiao Chen, Mauro Malvè
    Applied Sciences 2020 10 15
  • Role of disturbed wall shear stress in the development of cerebral aneurysms
    Yuji Shimogonya, Shunichi Fukuda
    Journal of Biomechanics 2024 176
  • Stent-Induced Vascular Remodeling in Two-Step Stent-Assisted Coiling Treatment of Brain Aneurysms: A Closer Look Into the Hemodynamic Changes During the Stent Healing Period
    Gabriel B. Santos, Iago Oliveira, José L. Gasche, Julio Militzer, Carlos E. Baccin
    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2021 143 3
  • Transition of intracranial aneurysmal wall enhancement from high to low wall shear stress mediation with size increase: A hemodynamic study based on 7T magnetic resonance imaging
    Yudi Tang, Haining Wei, Zihao Zhang, Mingzhu Fu, Junqiang Feng, Zhixin Li, Xinke Liu, Yue Wu, Jinyuan Zhang, Wei You, Rong Xue, Yan Zhuo, Yuhua Jiang, Youxiang Li, Rui Li, Peng Liu
    Heliyon 2024 10 9
  • Computational fluid dynamics based hemodynamics in the management of intracranial aneurysms: state-of-the-art
    Bin Hu, Zhao Shi, U. Joseph Schoepf, Akos Varga-Szemes, W. Evans Few, Long Jiang Zhang
    Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology 2021 4 3

More in this TOC Section

  • SAVE vs. Solumbra Techniques for Thrombectomy
  • CT Perfusion&Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Delayed Reperfusion Post-Thrombectomy&Thrombolysis
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire