Advertisement

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.

AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Index by author

May 01, 2019; Volume 40,Issue 5

  1. Aghayev, E.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
      Open Access
      Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine Injections
      F.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. Friedly
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050

      In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.

  2. Ahmed, R.

    1. Interventional
      Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge Device Associated with Stenting: A Single-Center Experience
      F. Cagnazzo, R. Ahmed, C. Dargazanli, P.-H. Lefevre, G. Gascou, I. Derraz, S.A. Kalmanovich, C. Riquelme, A. Bonafe and V. Costalat
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 820-826; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6032

  3. Ahn, K.J.

    1. Interventional
      Image Quality of Low-Dose Cerebral Angiography and Effectiveness of Clinical Implementation on Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Procedures for Intracranial Aneurysms
      J. Choi, B. Kim, Y. Choi, N.Y. Shin, J. Jang, H.S. Choi, S.L. Jung and K.J. Ahn
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 827-833; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6029

  4. Amans, M.R.

    1. Head & Neck
      Open Access
      Reduced Jet Velocity in Venous Flow after CSF Drainage: Assessing Hemodynamic Causes of Pulsatile Tinnitus
      H. Haraldsson, J.R. Leach, E.I. Kao, A.G. Wright, S.G. Ammanuel, R.S. Khangura, M.K. Ballweber, C.T. Chin, V.N. Shah, K. Meisel, D.A. Saloner and M.R. Amans
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 849-854; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6043

  5. Ammanuel, S.G.

    1. Head & Neck
      Open Access
      Reduced Jet Velocity in Venous Flow after CSF Drainage: Assessing Hemodynamic Causes of Pulsatile Tinnitus
      H. Haraldsson, J.R. Leach, E.I. Kao, A.G. Wright, S.G. Ammanuel, R.S. Khangura, M.K. Ballweber, C.T. Chin, V.N. Shah, K. Meisel, D.A. Saloner and M.R. Amans
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 849-854; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6043

  6. Annaswamy, T.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
      Open Access
      Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine Injections
      F.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. Friedly
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050

      In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.

  7. Anxionnat, R.

    1. Adult Brain
      Susceptibility-Weighted Angiography for the Follow-Up of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery
      S. Finitsis, R. Anxionnat, B. Gory, S. Planel, L. Liao and S. Bracard
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 792-797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6053

  8. Aoki, S.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEInterventional
      Usefulness of Silent MR Angiography for Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with a Flow-Diverter Device
      H. Oishi, T. Fujii, M. Suzuki, N. Takano, K. Teranishi, K. Yatomi, T. Kitamura, M. Yamamoto, S. Aoki and H. Arai
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 808-814; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6047

      Silent MRA is a procedure using an ultrashort TE and arterial spin-labeling techniques, which efficiently visualizes the status after the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In Silent MRA, the 3D image is reconstructed by subtracting the control image from the image obtained by the labeling pulse. Seventy-eight large, unruptured internal carotid aneurysms in 78 patients were the subjects of this study. After 6 months of treatment, they underwent follow-up digital subtraction angiography, Silent MRA, and TOF-MRA, performed simultaneously. The authors found Silent MRA is superior for visualizing blood flow images inside flow-diverter devices compared with TOF-MRA. Furthermore, Silent MRA enables the assessment of aneurysmal embolization status. Silent MRA is useful for assessing the status of large and giant unruptured internal carotid aneurysms after flow-diverter placement.

  9. Arai, H.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEInterventional
      Usefulness of Silent MR Angiography for Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with a Flow-Diverter Device
      H. Oishi, T. Fujii, M. Suzuki, N. Takano, K. Teranishi, K. Yatomi, T. Kitamura, M. Yamamoto, S. Aoki and H. Arai
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 808-814; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6047

      Silent MRA is a procedure using an ultrashort TE and arterial spin-labeling techniques, which efficiently visualizes the status after the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. In Silent MRA, the 3D image is reconstructed by subtracting the control image from the image obtained by the labeling pulse. Seventy-eight large, unruptured internal carotid aneurysms in 78 patients were the subjects of this study. After 6 months of treatment, they underwent follow-up digital subtraction angiography, Silent MRA, and TOF-MRA, performed simultaneously. The authors found Silent MRA is superior for visualizing blood flow images inside flow-diverter devices compared with TOF-MRA. Furthermore, Silent MRA enables the assessment of aneurysmal embolization status. Silent MRA is useful for assessing the status of large and giant unruptured internal carotid aneurysms after flow-diverter placement.

  10. Augustyn, R.A.

    1. Pediatrics
      Comparison of Iterative Model Reconstruction versus Filtered Back-Projection in Pediatric Emergency Head CT: Dose, Image Quality, and Image-Reconstruction Times
      R.N. Southard, D.M.E. Bardo, M.H. Temkit, M.A. Thorkelson, R.A. Augustyn and C.A. Martinot
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 866-871; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6034
« Previous (Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23) Next »
Back to top

In this issue

Advertisement
Advertisement