Impact of Skull Defects on the Role of CTA for Brain Death Confirmation

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   A definition of irreversible coma: report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death. JAMA 1968;205:337–40 doi:10.1001/jama.1968.03140320031009 pmid:5694976

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Wijdicks EF,
   3. Varelas PN,
   4. Gronseth GS, et al

   . Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults—report of the quality standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010;74:1911–18 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e242a8 pmid:20530327

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Nakagawa TA,
   3. Ashwal S,
   4. Mathur M, et al

   ; Society of Critical Care Medicine, Section on Critical Care and Section on Neurology of American Academy of Pediatrics, Child Neurology Society. Clinical report: guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children—an update of the 1987 task force recommendations. Pediatrics 2011;128:e720–40 doi:10.1542/peds.2011-1511 pmid:21873704

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Haupt WF,
   3. Rudolf J

   . European brain death codes: a comparison of national guidelines. J Neurol 1999;246:432–37 doi:10.1007/s004150050378 pmid:10431766

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Wijdicks EF

   . The diagnosis of brain death. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1215–21 doi:10.1056/NEJM200104193441606 pmid:11309637

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Kramer AH

   . Ancillary testing in brain death. Semin Neurol 2015;35:125–38 doi:10.1055/s-0035-1547541 pmid:25839721

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Russo H,
   3. Bressolle F

   . Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of thiopental. Clin Pharmacokinet 1998;35:95–134 doi:10.2165/00003088-199835020-00002 pmid:9739479

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Marrache F,
   3. Megarbane B,
   4. Pirnay S, et al

   . Difficulties in assessing brain death in a case of benzodiazepine poisoning with persistent cerebral blood flow. Hum Exp Toxicol 2004;23:503–05 doi:10.1191/0960327104ht478cr pmid:15553176

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Bradac GB,
   3. Simon RS

   . Angiography in brain death. Neuroradiology 1974;7:25–28 doi:10.1007/BF00344671 pmid:4407646

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Braum M,
    3. Ducrocq X,
    4. Huot JC, et al

    . Intravenous angiography in brain death: report of 140 patients. Neuroradiology 1997;39:400–05 doi:10.1007/s002340050432 pmid:9225317

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Heran MK,
    3. Heran NS,
    4. Shemie SD

    . A review of ancillary tests in evaluating brain death. Can J Neurol Sci 2008;35:409–19 doi:10.1017/S0317167100009069 pmid:18973057

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Frampas E,
    3. Videcoq M,
    4. de Kerviler E, et al

    . CT angiography for brain death diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1566–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1614 pmid:19406767

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Escudero D,
    3. Otero J,
    4. Marqués L, et al

    . Diagnosing brain death by CT perfusion and multislice CT angiography. Neurocrit Care 2009;11:261–71 doi:10.1007/s12028-009-9243-7 pmid:19565357

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Berenguer CM,
    3. Davis FE,
    4. Howington JU

    . Brain death confirmation: comparison of computed tomographic angiography with nuclear medicine perfusion scan. J Trauma 2010;68:553–59 doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cef18a pmid:20220416

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Bohatyrewicz R,
    3. Sawicki M,
    4. Walecka A, et al

    . Computed tomographic angiography and perfusion in the diagnosis of brain death. Transplant Proc 2010;42:3941–46 doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.143 pmid:21168593

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Rieke A,
    3. Regli B,
    4. Mattle HP, et al

    . Computed tomography angiography (CTA) to prove circulatory arrest for the diagnosis of brain death in the context of organ transplantation. Swiss Med Wkly 2011;141:w13261 doi:10.4414/smw.2011.13261 pmid:21971739

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Welschehold S,
    3. Kerz T,
    4. Boor S, et al

    . Detection of intracranial circulatory arrest in brain death using cranial CT-angiography. Eur J Neurol 2013;20:173–79 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2012.03826.x pmid:22788547

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Sawicki M,
    3. Bohatyrewicz R,
    4. Safranow K, et al

    . Computed tomographic angiography criteria in the diagnosis of brain death-comparison of sensitivity and interobserver reliability of different evaluation scales. Neuroradiology 2014;56:609–20 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1364-9 pmid:24801451

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Monro A

    . Observations on Structure and Functions of the Nervous System. London: Creech and Johnson; 1783
20. 20.↵
    2. Kellie G

    . Appearance observed in the dissection of two individuals; death from cold and congestion of the brain. Trans Med Chir Soc Edinb 1824;1:84. https://archive.org/details/b22384315. Accessed December 20, 2018.
21. 21.↵
    2. Marshall SA,
    3. Kalanuria A,
    4. Markandaya M, et al

    . Management of intracerebral pressure in the neurosciences critical care unit. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013;24:361–73 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2013.03.004 pmid:23809031

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Alvarez LA,
    3. Lipton RB,
    4. Hirschfeld A, et al

    . Brain death determination by angiography in the setting of a skull defect. Arch Neurol 1988;45:225–27 doi:10.1001/archneur.1988.00520260117031 pmid:3341939

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Frisardi F,
    3. Stefanini M,
    4. Natoli S, et al

    . Decompressive craniectomy may cause diagnostic challenges to assess brain death by computed tomography angiography. Minerva Anestesiol 2014;80:113–18 pmid:23698543

    PubMed
24. 24.↵
    Brasil. Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução No. 2.173, de 23 de Novembro de 2017. Define os critérios do diagnóstico de morte encefálica. Brasília (DF): CFM; 2017. Disponível em: https://sistemas.cfm.org.br/normas/visualizar/resolucoes/BR/2017/2173. Accessed December 20, 2018.
25. 25.↵
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report of AAPM task group 23. AAPM report no. 96. https://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_96.pdf. Accessed December 20, 2018.
26. 26.↵
    2. Kricheff II,
    3. Pinto RS,
    4. George AE, et al

    . Angiographic findings in brain death. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1978;315:168–83 doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb50338.x pmid:284734

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Savard M,
    3. Turgeon AF,
    4. Gariépy JL, et al

    . Selective 4 vessels angiography in brain death: a retrospective study. Can J Neurol Sci 2010;37:492–97 doi:10.1017/S0317167100010520 pmid:20724258

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Taylor T,
    3. Dineen RA,
    4. Gardiner DC, et al

    . Computed tomography (CT) angiography for confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of brain death. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;CD009694 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009694.pub2 pmid:24683063

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Dupas B,
    3. Gayet-Delacroix M,
    4. Villers D, et al

    . Diagnosis of brain death using two-phase spiral CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:641–47 pmid:9576648

    Abstract
30. 30.↵
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Taschner CA,
    4. Vidal A, et al

    . The role of spiral CT for the assessment of the intracranial circulation in suspected brain-death. J Neuroradiol 2006;33:90–95 doi:10.1016/S0150-9861(06)77237-6 pmid:16733422

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Combes JC,
    3. Chomel A,
    4. Ricolfi F, et al

    . Reliability of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of brain death. Transplant Proc 2007;39:16–20 doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.204 pmid:17275466

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Brasil S,
    3. Bor-Seng-Shu E,
    4. de-Lima-Oliveira M, et al

    . Role of computed tomography angiography and perfusion tomography in diagnosing brain death: a systematic review. J Neuroradiol 2016;43:133–40 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2015.07.006 pmid:26542968

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Garrett MP,
    3. Williamson RW,
    4. Bohl MA, et al

    . Computed tomography angiography as a confirmatory test for the diagnosis of brain death. J Neurosurg 2018;128:639–44 doi:10.3171/2016.10.JNS161042 pmid:28304181

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Welschehold S,
    3. Boor S,
    4. Reuland K, et al

    . Technical aids in the diagnosis of brain death: a comparison of SEP, AEP, EEG, TCD and CT angiography. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012;109:624–30 doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0624 pmid:23093994

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Miller K,
    3. Eljamel S

    . Does size and site matter in therapeutic descompressive craniectomy? A laboratory-based experimental study. World Neurosurg 2016;95:441–46 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.061 pmid:27567573

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Wang YS,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Shi XW, et al

    . Size of bone flap and bone window area may impact the outcome of decompressive craniectomy using standard bone flap. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016;20:3679–82 pmid:27649670

    PubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Bor-seng-Shu E,
    3. Figueiredo EG,
    4. Amorim RL, et al

    . Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurger 2012;117:589–96 doi:10.3171/2012.6.JNS101400 pmid:22794321

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Sawicki M,
    3. Bohatyrewicz R,
    4. Safranow K, et al

    . Dynamic evaluation of stasis filling phenomenon with computed tomography in diagnosis of brain death. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1061–69 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1210-5 pmid:23728070

    CrossRefPubMed