Correlation between 2D and 3D Fetal Brain MRI Biometry and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Fetuses with Suspected Microcephaly and Macrocephaly

References

1. 1.↵
   2. DeRosa R,
   3. Lenke RR,
   4. Kurczynski TW, et al

   . In utero diagnosis of benign fetal macrocephaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:690–92 doi:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90381-5 pmid:2675601

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Chervenak FA,
   3. Jeanty P,
   4. Cantraine F, et al

   . The diagnosis of fetal microcephaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;149:512–57 doi:10.1016/0002-9378(84)90027-9 pmid:6742021

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Day RE,
   3. Schutt WH

   . Normal children with large heads: benign familial megalencephaly. Arch Dis Child 1979;54:512–17 doi:10.1136/adc.54.7.512 pmid:314781

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Lewis BA,
   3. Aram DM,
   4. Horwitz SJ

   . Language and motor findings in benign megalencephaly. Percept Mot Skills 1989;68:1051–54 doi:10.2466/pms.1989.68.3c.1051 pmid:2762071

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Biran-Gol Y,
   3. Malinger G,
   4. Cohen H, et al

   . Developmental outcome of isolated fetal macrocephaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:147–53 doi:10.1002/uog.7585 pmid:20178112

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Petersson S,
   3. Pedersen NL,
   4. Schalling M, et al

   . Primary megalencephaly at birth and low intelligence level. Neurology 1999;53:1254–59 doi:10.1212/WNL.53.6.1254 pmid:10522881

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Stoler-Poria S,
   3. Lev D,
   4. Schweiger A, et al

   . Developmental outcome of isolated fetal microcephaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:154–58 doi:10.1002/uog.7556 pmid:20069548

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Leibovitz Z,
   3. Daniel-Spiegel E,
   4. Malinger G, et al

   . Prediction of microcephaly at birth using three reference ranges for fetal head circumference: can we improve prenatal diagnosis? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:586–92 doi:10.1002/uog.15801 pmid:26511765

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Nawathe A,
   3. Doherty J,
   4. Pandya P

   . Fetal microcephaly. BMJ 2018;361:k2232 doi:10.1136/bmj.k2232 pmid:29866660

   FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Malinger G,
    3. Lev D,
    4. Ben-Sira L, et al

    . Can syndromic macrocephaly be diagnosed in utero? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:72–81 doi:10.1002/uog.8799 pmid:20734344

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Gafner M,
    3. Fried S,
    4. Gosher N, et al

    . Fetal brain biometry: is there an agreement among ultrasound, MRI and the measurements at birth? Eur J Radiol 2020;133:109369 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109369 pmid:33126174

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Barzilay E,
    3. Bar-Yosef O,
    4. Dorembus S, et al

    . Fetal brain anomalies associated with ventriculomegaly or asymmetry: an MRI-based study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:371–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5009 pmid:28059712

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Ber R,
    3. Hoffman D,
    4. Hoffman C, et al

    . Volume of structures in the fetal brain measured with a new semiautomated method. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2193–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5349 pmid:28838909

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Ber R,
    3. Bar-Yosef O,
    4. Hoffmann C, et al

    . Normal fetal posterior fossa in MR imaging: new biometric data and possible clinical significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:795–802 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4258 pmid:25655869

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Gafner M,
    3. Yagel I,
    4. Fried S, et al

    . Fetal brain biometry in isolated mega cisterna magna: MRI and US study. J Matern Neonatal Med 2020;1–9 doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1849094 pmid:33207970

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Polat A,
    3. Barlow S,
    4. Ber R, et al

    . Volumetric MRI study of the intrauterine growth restriction fetal brain. Eur Radiol 2017;27:2110–18 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4502-4 pmid:27491875

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Olshaker H,
    3. Ber R,
    4. Hoffman D, et al

    . Volumetric brain MRI study in fetuses with congenital heart disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1164–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5628 pmid:29674414

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Tilea B,
    3. Alberti C,
    4. Adamsbaum C, et al

    . Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:173–81 doi:10.1002/uog.6276 pmid:19172662

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Newmark CS

    2. Sparrow SS,
    3. Cicchetti DV.
    4. Balla DA

    . The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 2nd ed. In: Newmark CS. Major Psychological Assessment Instruments. Allyn & Bacon 2005
20. 20.↵
    2. Chatham CH,
    3. Taylor KI,
    4. Charman T, et al

    . Adaptive behavior in autism: minimal clinically important differences on the Vineland-II. Autism Res 2018;11:270–83 doi:10.1002/aur.1874 pmid:28941213

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Sparrow SS,
    3. Cicchetti DV

    . Diagnostic uses of the Vineland adaptive behavior scales. J Pediatr Psychol 1985;10:215–25 doi:10.1093/jpepsy/10.2.215 pmid:4020603

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Grinberg A,
    3. Katorza E,
    4. Hoffman D, et al

    . Volumetric MRI study of the brain in fetuses with intrauterine cytomegalovirus infection and its correlation to neurodevelopmental outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:353–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5948 pmid:30760462

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Cicchetti DV

    . Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 1994;6:284–90 doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. DeMyer W

    . Megalencephaly: types, clinical syndromes, and management. Pediatr Neurol 1986;2:321–28 doi:10.1016/0887-8994(86)90072-X pmid:3334205

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Muenchberger H,
    3. Assaad N,
    4. Joy P, et al

    . Idiopathic macrocephaly in the infant: Long-term neurological and neuropsychological outcome. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22:1242–48 doi:10.1007/s00381-006-0080-0 pmid:16544148

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Lorber J,
    3. Priestley BL

    . Children with large heads: a practical approach to diagnosis in 557 children, with special reference to 109 children with megalencephaly. Dev Med Child Neurol 1981;23:494–504 doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1981.tb02023.x pmid:7274594

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Gooskens RH,
    3. Willemse J,
    4. Faber JA, et al

    . Macrocephalies: a differentiated approach. Neuropediatrics 1989;20:164–69 doi:10.1055/s-2008-1071284 pmid:2779746

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Berger I

    . Prenatal microcephaly: can we be more accurate? J Child Neurol 2009;24:97–100 doi:10.1177/0883073808321045 pmid:19168823

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Gelber SE,
    3. Grünebaum A,
    4. Chervenak FA

    . Prenatal screening for microcephaly: an update after three decades. J Perinat Med 2017;45:167–70 doi:10.1515/jpm-2016-0220 pmid:27662643

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Kurtz AB,
    3. Wapner RJ,
    4. Rubin CS, et al

    . Ultrasound criteria for in utero diagnosis of microcephaly. J Clin Ultrasound 1980;8:11–16 doi:10.1002/jcu.1870080104 pmid:6766470

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. De Bie I,
    3. Boucoiran I

    . No. 380: investigation and management of prenatally identified microcephaly. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2019;41:855–61 doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.10.014 pmid:31126434

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Deloison B,
    3. Chalouhi GE,
    4. Bernard JP, et al

    . Outcomes of fetuses with small head circumference on second-trimester ultrasonography. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:869–74 doi:10.1002/pd.3923 pmid:22692804

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Malinger G,
    3. Lerman-Sagie T,
    4. Watemberg N, et al

    . A normal second-trimester ultrasound does not exclude intracranial structural pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:51–56 doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00743.x pmid:12100418

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Gat I,
    3. Hoffmann C,
    4. Shashar D, et al

    . Fetal brain MRI: novel classification and contribution to sonography. Ultraschall Med 2016;37:176–84 doi:10.1055/s-0034-1384935 pmid:25535813

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Salomon-Estebanez M,
    3. Mohamed Z,
    4. Michaelidou M, et al

    . Vineland adaptive behavior scales to identify neurodevelopmental problems in children with congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017;12:96 doi:10.1186/s13023-017-0648-7 pmid:28532 504

    CrossRefPubMed