Grading of Pediatric Intracranial Tumors: Are Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging Superior to Conventional DWI?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Ward E,
   2. DeSantis C,
   3. Robbins A, et al

   . Childhood and adolescent cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:83–103 doi:10.3322/caac.21219 pmid:24488779

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Udaka YT,
   2. Packer RJ

   . Pediatric brain tumors. Neurol Clin 2018;36:533–56 doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2018.04.009 pmid:30072070

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Cha S

   . Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:475–87 pmid:16551981

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Koral K,
   2. Mathis D,
   3. Gimi B, et al

   . Common pediatric cerebellar tumors: correlation between cell densities and apparent diffusion coefficient metrics. Radiology 2013;268:532–37 doi:10.1148/radiol.13121362 pmid:23564715

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Kralik SF,
   2. Taha A,
   3. Kamer AP, et al

   . Diffusion imaging for tumor grading of supratentorial brain tumors in the first year of life. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:815–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3757 pmid:24200900

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Bull JG,
   2. Saunders DE,
   3. Clark CA

   . Discrimination of paediatric brain tumours using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms. Eur Radiol 2012;22:447–57 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2255-7 pmid:21918916

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Al-Sharydah AM,
   2. Al-Arfaj HK,
   3. Saleh Al-Muhaish H, et al

   . Can apparent diffusion coefficient values help distinguish between different types of pediatric brain tumors? Eur J Radiol Open 2019;6:49–55 doi:10.1016/j.ejro.2018.12.004 pmid:30627595

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Le Bihan D

   . Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging using steady-state free precession. Magn Reson Med 1988;7:346–51 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910070312 pmid:3205150

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Le Bihan D,
   2. Breton E,
   3. Lallemand D, et al

   . MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401–07 doi:10.1148/radiology.161.2.3763909 pmid:3763909

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Jensen JH,
    2. Helpern JA,
    3. Ramani A, et al

    . Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1432–40 doi:10.1002/mrm.20508 pmid:15906300

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Bai Y,
    2. Lin Y,
    3. Tian J, et al

    . Grading of gliomas by using monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion kurtosis MR imaging. Radiology 2016;278:496–504 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142173 pmid:26230975

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Goryawala MZ,
    2. Heros DO,
    3. Komotar RJ, et al

    . Value of diffusion kurtosis imaging in assessing low-grade gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;48:1551–58 doi:10.1002/jmri.26012 pmid:29573042

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Lin L,
    2. Bhawana R,
    3. Xue Y, et al

    . Comparative analysis of diffusional kurtosis imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and diffusion-weighted imaging in grading and assessing cellular proliferation of meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1032–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5662 pmid:29748203

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Xiao Z,
    2. Zhong Y,
    3. Tang Z, et al

    . Standard diffusion-weighted, diffusion kurtosis and intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging of sinonasal malignancies: correlations with Ki-67 proliferation status. Eur Radiol 2018;28:2923–33 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5286-x pmid:29383521

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Kikuchi K,
    2. Hiwatashi A,
    3. Togao O, et al

    . Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging of pediatric intracranial tumors: correlation with histology and diagnostic utility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Neuroradiol 2019;40:878–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6052 pmid:31023663

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Burrowes D,
    2. Fangusaro JR,
    3. Nelson PC, et al

    . Extended diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging with two-compartment and anomalous diffusion models for differentiation of low-grade and high-grade brain tumors in pediatric patients. Neuroradiology 2017;59:803–11 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1865-4 pmid:28689260

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Louis DN,
    2. Perry A,
    3. Reifenberger G, et al

    . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Kikuchi K,
    2. Hiwatashi A,
    3. Togao O, et al

    . Correlation between arterial spin-labeling perfusion and histopathological vascular density of pediatric intracranial tumors. J Neurooncol 2017;135:561–69 doi:10.1007/s11060-017-2604-8 pmid:28856499

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Zhao J,
    2. Wang YL,
    3. Li XB, et al

    . Comparative analysis of the diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging in grading gliomas, predicting tumour cell proliferation and IDH-1 gene mutation status. J Neurooncol 2019;141:195–203 doi:10.1007/s11060-018-03025-7 pmid:30414095

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Lima M,
    2. Reynaud O,
    3. Tsurugizawa T, et al

    . Characterization of glioma microcirculation and tissue features using intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in a rat brain model. Invest Radiol 2014;49:485–90 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000040

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Li JL,
    2. Ye WT,
    3. Liu ZY, et al

    . Comparison of microvascular perfusion evaluation among IVIM-DWI, CT perfusion imaging and histological microvessel density in rabbit liver VX2 tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 2018;46:64–69 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2017.10.014 pmid:29103979

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Iima M,
    2. Partridge SC,
    3. Le Bihan D

    . Six DWI questions you always wanted to know but were afraid to ask: clinical relevance for breast diffusion MRI. Eur Radiol 2020;30:2561–70 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06648-0 pmid:31965256

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Van Cauter S,
    2. Veraart J,
    3. Sijbers J, et al

    . Gliomas: diffusion kurtosis MR imaging in grading. Radiology 2012;263:492–501 doi:10.1148/radiol.12110927 pmid:22403168

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Raja R,
    2. Sinha N,
    3. Saini J, et al

    . Assessment of tissue heterogeneity using diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging for grading gliomas. Neuroradiology 2016;58:1217–31 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1758-y pmid:27796448

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Lin L,
    3. Wu J, et al

    . Histogram analysis in predicting the grade and histological subtype of meningiomas based on diffusion kurtosis imaging. Acta Radiol 2020;61:1228–39 doi:10.1177/0284185119898656 pmid:31986895

    CrossRefPubMed