Differential Subsampling with Cartesian Ordering–MRA for Classifying Residual Treated Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Kerr R,
   4. Stratton I, et al

   ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Naggara ON,
   3. White PM,
   4. Guilbert F, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on safety and efficacy. Radiology 2010;256:887–97 doi:10.1148/radiol.10091982 pmid:20634431

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. De Leacy RA,
   3. Fargen KM,
   4. Mascitelli JR, et al

   . Wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery and basilar apex treated by endovascular techniques: a multicentre, core lab adjudicated study evaluating safety and durability of occlusion (BRANCH). J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:31–36 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013771 pmid:29858397

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Ferns SP,
   3. Sprengers ME,
   4. van Rooij WJ, et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099 pmid:19520984

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Birks J,
   4. Clarke A, et al

   . The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18-year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015;385:691–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2 pmid:25465111

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Soize S,
   3. Gawlitza M,
   4. Raoult H, et al

   . Imaging follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular means: why, when, and how? Stroke 2016;47:1407–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011414 pmid:27026629

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Korosec FR,
   3. Frayne R,
   4. Grist TM, et al

   . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345–51 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360304 pmid:8875403

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Lim RP,
   3. Shapiro M,
   4. Wang EY, et al

   . 3D time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced bolus-chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1847–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1252

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Madhuranthakam AJ,
   3. Hu HH,
   4. Barger AV, et al

   . Undersampled elliptical centric view-order for improved spatial resolution in contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:50–58 doi:10.1002/mrm.20726

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Stalder AF,
    3. Schmidt M,
    4. Quick HH, et al

    . Highly undersampled contrast-enhanced MRA with iterative reconstruction: integration in a clinical setting. Magn Reson Med 2015;74:1652–60 doi:10.1002/mrm.25565 pmid:25522299

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Griswold MA,
    3. Jakob PM,
    4. Heidemann RM, et al

    . Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–10 doi:10.1002/mrm.10171 pmid:12111967

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Nael K,
    3. Drummond J,
    4. Costa AB, et al

    . Differential Subsampling with Cartesian Ordering for ultrafast high-resolution MRA in the assessment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroimaging 2020;30:40–44 doi:10.1111/jon.12677 pmid:31721362

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Mascitelli JR,
    3. Moyle H,
    4. Oermann EK, et al

    . An update to the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification of intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2015;7:496–502 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011258 pmid:24898735

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Stapleton CJ,
    3. Torok CM,
    4. Rabinov JD, et al

    . Validation of the Modified Raymond-Roy classification for intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization. J NeuroIntervent Surg 2016;8:927–33 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012035 pmid:26438554

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Deutschmann HA,
    3. Augustin M,
    4. Simbrunner J, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:628–34 pmid:17416811

    PubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Ahmed SU,
    3. Mocco J,
    4. Zhang X, et al

    . MRA versus DSA for the follow-up imaging of intracranial aneurysms treated using endovascular techniques: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:1009–14 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014936 pmid:31048457

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Anzalone N,
    3. Scomazzoni F,
    4. Cirillo M, et al

    . Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1530–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1166 pmid:18556359

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. van Amerongen MJ,
    3. Boogaarts HD,
    4. de Vries J, et al

    . MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1655–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3700 pmid:24008171

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Attali J,
    3. Benaissa A,
    4. Soize S, et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:81–86 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011449 pmid:25352582

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Binyamin TR,
    3. Dahlin BC,
    4. Waldau B

    . Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2017;42:182–85 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.009 pmid:28457861

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Boddu SR,
    3. Tong FC,
    4. Dehkharghani S, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2112–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4008 pmid:24994828

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Tsao J

    . Ultrafast imaging: principles, pitfalls, solutions, and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:252–66 doi:10.1002/jmri.22239 pmid:20677249

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Mathur M,
    3. Jones JR,
    4. Weinreb JC

    . Gadolinium deposition and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a radiologist's primer. Radiographics 2020;40:153–62 doi:10.1148/rg.2020190110 pmid:31809230

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Ryu KH,
    3. Baek HJ,
    4. Moon JI, et al

    . Usefulness of noncontrast-enhanced silent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for treated intracranial aneurysm follow-up in comparison with time-of-flight MRA. Neurosurgery 2020;87:220–28 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz421 pmid:31625579

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Oishi H,
    3. Fujii T,
    4. Suzuki M, et al

    . Usefulness of silent MR angiography for intracranial aneurysms treated with a flow-diverter device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Neuroradiol 2019;40:808–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6047 pmid:31048297

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Takano N,
    3. Suzuki M,
    4. Irie R, et al

    . Non-contrast-enhanced silent scan MR angiography of intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms treated with a low-profile visualized intraluminal support device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1610–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5223

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Heo YJ,
    3. Jeong HW,
    4. Baek JW, et al

    . Pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition with subtraction-based MRA during the follow-up of stent-assisted coil embolization of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Neuroradiol 2019;40:815–19 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6035 pmid:30975655

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Patzig M,
    3. Forbrig R,
    4. Gruber M, et al

    . The clinical value of ceMRA versus DSA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by coil embolization: an assessment of occlusion classifications and impact on treatment decisions. Eur Radiol 2021;31:4104–13 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07492-3 pmid:33221944

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9

    CrossRefPubMed