Automatic Quantification of Normal Brain Gyrification Patterns and Changes in Fetuses with Polymicrogyria and Lissencephaly Based on MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Fogliarini C,
   3. Chaumoitre K,
   4. Chapon F, et al

   . Assessment of cortical maturation with prenatal MRI, Part I: normal cortical maturation. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1671–85 doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2782-1 pmid:15856237

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Dubois J,
   3. Dehaene-Lambertz G

   . Fetal and postnatal development of the cortex: MRI and genetics. Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference 2015;2:11–19 doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-397025-1.00194-9

   CrossRef
3. 3.↵
   2. Garel C,
   3. Chantrel E,
   4. Brisse H, et al

   . Fetal cerebral cortex: normal gestational landmarks identified using prenatal MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:184–89 pmid:11158907

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Dubois J,
   3. Lefèvre J,
   4. Angleys H, et al

   . The dynamics of cortical folding waves and prematurity-related deviations revealed by spatial and spectral analysis of gyrification. Neuroimage 2019;185:934–46 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.005 pmid:29522888

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Dubois J,
   3. Benders M,
   4. Borradori-Tolsa C, et al

   . Primary cortical folding in the human newborn: an early marker of later functional development. Brain 2008;131:2028–41 doi:10.1093/brain/awn137 pmid:18587151

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Garel C

   . MRI of the Fetal Brain Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies. Springer-Verlag; 2004
7. 7.↵
   2. Barkovich AJ

   . MRI analysis of sulcation morphology in polymicrogyria. Epilesia 2010;51:17–22 doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02436.x pmid:20331706

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Schmitt S,
   3. Ringwald KG,
   4. Meller T, et al

   . European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. Associations of gestational age with gyrification and neurocognition in healthy adults. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2023;273:467–79 doi:10.1007/s00406-022-01454-0 pmid:35904633

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Cassart M,
   3. Garel C

   . European overview of current practice of fetal imaging by pediatric radiologists: a new task force is launched. Pediatr Radiol 2020;50:1794–98 doi:10.1007/s00247-020-04710-4 pmid:32556810

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Garel C

    . Fetal cerebral biometry: normal parenchymal findings and ventricular size. Eur Radiol 2005;15:809–13 doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2610-z pmid:15726378

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Epstein KN,
    3. Kline-Fath BM,
    4. Zhang B, et al

    . Prenatal evaluation of intracranial hemorrhage on fetal MRI: a retrospective review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:2222–28 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7320 pmid:34711550

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Wilson M,
    3. Muir K,
    4. Reddy D, et al

    . Prognostic accuracy of fetal MRI in predicting postnatal neurodevelopmental outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:2146–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6770 pmid:32943421

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Jaimes C,
    3. Rofeberg V,
    4. Stopp C, et al

    . Association of isolated congenital heart disease with fetal brain maturation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1525–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6635 pmid:32646947

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Papaioannou G,
    3. Klein W,
    4. Cassart M, et al

    . Indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal central nervous system: recommendations from the European Society of Paediatric Radiology Fetal Task Force. Pediatr Radiol 2023;53:297–312 doi:10.1007/s00247-022-05495-4 pmid:36161506

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Rima Valevičien N,
    3. Varyt G,
    4. Zakarevičien J, et al

    . Use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating fetal brain and abdomen malformations during pregnancy. Medicina (B Aires) 2019;55:55 doi:10.3390/medicina55020055

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    2. Raafat M,
    3. Hosny SM,
    4. Sheta GA, et al

    . Role of fetal MRI to diagnose abnormal cerebral ventricular system and associated fetal brain anomalies. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2022;53:85 doi:10.1186/s43055-022-00757-5

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    2. Zilles K,
    3. Armstrong E,
    4. Schleicher A, et al

    . The human pattern of gyrification in the cerebral cortex. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1988;179:173–79 doi:10.1007/BF00304699 pmid:3232854

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Shimony JS,
    3. Smyser CD,
    4. Wideman G, et al

    . Comparison of cortical folding measures for evaluation of developing human brain. Neuroimage 2016;125:780–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.001 pmid:26550941

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Luders E,
    3. Thompson PM,
    4. Narr KL, et al

    . A curvature-based approach to estimate local gyrification on the cortical surface. Neuroimage 2006;29:1224–30 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.049 pmid:16223589

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Wright R,
    3. Kyriakopoulou V,
    4. Ledig C, et al

    . Automatic quantification of normal cortical folding patterns from fetal brain MRI. Neuroimage 2014;91:21–32 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.034 pmid:24473102

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Lefèvre J,
    3. Germanaud D,
    4. Dubois J, et al

    . Are developmental trajectories of cortical folding comparable between cross-sectional datasets of fetuses and preterm newborns? Cereb Cortex 2016;26:3023–35 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv123 pmid:26045567

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Raznahan A,
    3. Shaw P,
    4. Lalonde F, et al

    . How does your cortex grow? J Neurosci 2011;31:7174–77 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0054-11.2011 pmid:21562281

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Duvernoy CS,
    3. Smith DE,
    4. Manohar P, et al

    . Gender differences in adverse outcomes after contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) percutaneous coronary intervention registry. Am Heart J 2010;159:677–83.e1 doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.040 pmid:20362729

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Luders E,
    3. Narr KL,
    4. Bilder RM, et al

    . Mapping the relationship between cortical convolution and intelligence: effects of gender. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:2019–26 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm227 pmid:18089578

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Lohmann G

    . Extracting line representations of sulcal and gyral patterns in MR images of the human brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:1040–48 doi:10.1109/42.746714 pmid:10048861

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Chen H,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Ge F, et al

    . Gyral net: a new representation of cortical folding organization. Med Image Anal 2017;42:14–25 doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.001 pmid:28732269

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Im K,
    3. Pienaar R,
    4. Paldino MJ, et al

    . Quantification and discrimination of abnormal sulcal patterns in polymicrogyria. Cereb Cortex 2013;23:3007–15 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs292 pmid:22989584

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Rajagopalan V,
    3. Scott J,
    4. Habas PA, et al

    . Quantitative in vivo MRI measurement of cortical development in the fetus. Brain Struct Funct 2012;217:127–39 doi:10.1007/s00429-011-0325-x pmid:21562906

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Rajagopalan V,
    3. Scott J,
    4. Habas PA, et al

    . Local tissue growth patterns underlying normal fetal human brain gyrification quantified in utero. J Neurosci 2011;31:2878–87 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5458-10.2011 pmid:21414909

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Habas PA,
    3. Scott JA,
    4. Roosta A, et al

    . Early folding patterns and asymmetries of the normal human brain detected from in utero MRI. Cereb Cortex 2012;22:13–25 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr053 pmid:21571694

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Im K,
    3. Guimaraes A,
    4. Kim Y, et al

    . Quantitative folding pattern analysis of early primary sulci in human fetuses with brain abnormalities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1449–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5217 pmid:28522661

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Wu J,
    3. Awate SP,
    4. Licht DJ, et al

    . Assessment of MRI-based automated fetal cerebral cortical folding measures in prediction of gestational age in the third trimester. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1369–74 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4357 pmid:26045578

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Dudovitch G,
    3. Link-Sourani D,
    4. Ben Sira L, et al

    . Deep learning automatic fetal structures segmentation in MRI scans with few annotated datasets. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, October 4–8, 2020; Virtual: 365–74
34. 34.↵
    2. Ori Ben Z,
    3. Netanell A,
    4. Bossmat Y, et al

    . Automatic segmentation of fetal brain components from MRI using deep learning. In: Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the Society of MR Radiographers and Technologists, May 15-20, 2021; Virtual
35. 35.↵
    2. Borghi E,
    3. de Onis M,
    4. Garza C, et al

    ; WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Construction of the World Health Organization child growth standards: selection of methods for attained growth curves. Stat Med 2006;25:247–65 doi:10.1002/sim.2227 pmid:16143968

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Benjamini Y,
    3. Yekutieli D

    . The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Statist 2001;29:1165–88 doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998

    CrossRefWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Benjamini Y,
    3. Yekutieli D

    . False discovery rate: adjusted multiple confidence intervals for selected parameters. J Am Stat Assoc 2005;100:71–81 doi:10.1198/016214504000001907

    CrossRef
38. 38.↵
    2. Rigby RA,
    3. Stasinopoulos DM

    . Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Appl Statist 2005;54:507–54
39. 39.↵
    2. Righini A,
    3. Zirpoli S,
    4. Mrakic F, et al

    . Early prenatal MR imaging diagnosis of polymicrogyria. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:343–46 pmid:14970044

    PubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Dhombres F,
    3. Nahama-Allouche C,
    4. Gelot A, et al

    . Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of polymicrogyria. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:951–54 doi:10.1002/uog.6251 pmid:18991326

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Breiman L

    . Random Forests. Springer Link; 2001
42. 42.↵
    2. Chang CC,
    3. Lin CJ

    . LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology. Vol 2. 2001
43. 43.↵
    2. Chen T,
    3. He T

    . XGBoost: Extreme Gradient Boosting. R package version 0.4-2 1.4 (2015): 1–4.
44. 44.↵
    2. Chawla NV,
    3. Bowyer KW,
    4. Hall LO, et al

    . SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique. J Artif Intell Res 2002;16:321–57

    CrossRef
45. 45.↵
    2. Chicco D,
    3. Jurman G

    . The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics 2020;21:6 doi:10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 pmid:31898477

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Dubois J,
    3. Benders M,
    4. Cachia A, et al

    . Mapping the early cortical folding process in the preterm newborn brain. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:1444–54 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm180 pmid:17934189

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
47. 47.↵
    2. Janssen J,
    3. Diáz-Caneja CM,
    4. Alloza C, et al

    . Dissimilarity in sulcal width patterns in the cortex can be used to identify patients with schizophrenia with extreme deficits in cognitive performance. Schizophr Bull 2021;47:552–61 doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa131 pmid:32964935

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    2. Kasprian G,
    3. Langs G,
    4. Brugger PC, et al

    . The prenatal origin of hemispheric asymmetry: an in utero neuroimaging study. Cereb Cortex 2011;21:1076–83 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq179 pmid:20851852

    CrossRefPubMed