Subarachnoid Space Measurements in Apparently Healthy Fetuses Using MR Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Mortazavi MM,
   2. Quadri SA,
   3. Khan MA, et al

   . Subarachnoid trabeculae: a comprehensive review of their embryology, histology, morphology, and surgical significance. World Neurosurg 2018;111:279–90 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.041 pmid:29269062

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Barkovich MJ,
   2. Li Y,
   3. Desikan RS, et al

   . Challenges in pediatric neuroimaging. Neuroimage 2019;185:793–801 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.044 pmid:29684645

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Piatt JH Jr.

   Unexpected findings on brain and spine imaging in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2004;51:507–27 doi:10.1016/S0031-3955(03)00214-1 pmid:15062682

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Suara RO,
   2. Trouth AJ,
   3. Collins M

   . Benign subarachnoid space enlargement of infancy. J Natl Med Assoc 2001;93:70–73 pmid:12653385

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Biran-Gol Y,
   2. Malinger G,
   3. Cohen H, et al

   . Developmental outcome of isolated fetal macrocephaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:147–53 doi:10.1002/uog.7585 pmid:20178112

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Marcdante KJ,
   2. Kliegman RM,
   3. Schuh AM, eds.

   Nelson Essentials of Pediatrics, Ninth Edition. Elsevier; 2022:6
7. 7.↵
   1. Nellhaus G

   . Head circumference from birth to eighteen years: practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics 1968;41:106–14 doi:10.1542/peds.41.1.106 pmid:5635472

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Burke N,
   2. Burke G,
   3. Breathnach F, et al

   ; Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:598.e1–11 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.017 pmid:28213060

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Corbacioglu Esmer A,
   2. Yuksel A,
   3. Aksu Uzunhan T, et al

   . Evaluation of fetal subarachnoid space using transabdominal ultrasonography and normal values during pregnancy. Springerplus 2016;5:1439 doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3121-5 pmid:27652015

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Frankel DA,
    2. Fessell DP,
    3. Wolfson WP

    . High resolution sonographic determination of the normal dimensions of the intracranial extraaxial compartment in the newborn infant. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:411–15; quiz 417–18 doi:10.7863/jum.1998.17.7.411 pmid:9669298

    Abstract
11. 11.↵
    1. Govaert P,
    2. Pauwels W,
    3. Vanhaesebrouck P, et al

    . Ultrasound measurement of the subarachnoid space in infants. Eur J Pediatr 1989;148:412–13 doi:10.1007/BF00595899 pmid:2646128

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Lam WW,
    2. Ai VH,
    3. Wong V, et al

    . Ultrasonographic measurement of subarachnoid space in normal infants and children. Pediatr Neurol 2001;25:380–84 doi:10.1016/s0887-8994(01)00349-6 pmid:11744312

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Libicher M,
    2. Tröger J

    . US measurement of the subarachnoid space in infants: normal values. Radiology 1992;184:749–51 doi:10.1148/radiology.184.3.1509061 pmid:1509061

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Narli N,
    2. Soyupak S,
    3. Yildizdaş HY, et al

    . Ultrasonographic measurement of subarachnoid space in normal term newborns. Eur J Radiol 2006;58:110–12 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.11.007 pmid:16406435

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Fukuyama Y,
    2. Miyao M,
    3. Ishizu T, et al

    . Developmental changes in normal cranial measurements by computed tomography. Dev Med Child Neurol 1979;21:425–32 doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1979.tb01645.x pmid:520691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Kleinman PK,
    2. Zito JL,
    3. Davidson RI, et al

    . The subarachnoid spaces in children: normal variations in size. Radiology 1983;147:455–57 doi:10.1148/radiology.147.2.6601281 pmid:6601281

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Pedersen H,
    2. Gyldensted M,
    3. Gyldensted C

    . Measurement of the normal ventricular system and supratentorial subarachnoid space in children with computed tomography. Neuroradiology 1979;17:231–37 doi:10.1007/BF00337531 pmid:314607

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. McArdle CB,
    2. Richardson CJ,
    3. Nicholas DA, et al

    . Developmental features of the neonatal brain: MR imaging, Part II: ventricular size and extracerebral space. Radiology 1987;162:230–34 doi:10.1148/radiology.162.1.3786768 pmid:3786768

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Malinger G,
    2. Lev D,
    3. Ben-Sira L, et al

    . Can syndromic macrocephaly be diagnosed in utero? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:72–81 doi:10.1002/uog.8799 pmid:20734344

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Pilu G,
    2. De Palma L,
    3. Romero R, et al

    . The fetal subarachnoid cisterns: an ultrasound study with report of a case of congenital communicating hydrocephalus. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:365–72 doi:10.7863/jum.1986.5.7.365 pmid:3522926

    Abstract
21. 21.↵
    1. Malinger G,
    2. Lerman-Sagie T,
    3. Achiron R, et al

    . The subarachnoid space: normal fetal development as demonstrated by transvaginal ultrasound. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:890–93 doi:10.1002/1097-0223(200011)20:11<890::AID-PD945>3.0.CO;2-Z

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Watanabe Y,
    2. Abe S,
    3. Takagi K, et al

    . Evolution of subarachnoid space in normal fetuses using magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 2005;25:1217–22 doi:10.1002/pd.1315 pmid:16353268

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Yaniv G,
    2. Katorza E,
    3. Tsehmaister Abitbol V, et al

    . Discrepancy in fetal head biometry between ultrasound and MRI in suspected microcephalic fetuses. Acta Radiol 2017;58:1519–27 doi:10.1177/0284185117698865 pmid:28304179

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Kertes I,
    2. Hoffman D,
    3. Yahal O, et al

    . The normal fetal cavum septum pellucidum in MR imaging: new biometric data. Eur J Radiol 2021;135:109470 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109470 pmid:33338761

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Ber R,
    2. Bar-Yosef O,
    3. Hoffmann C, et al

    . Normal fetal posterior fossa in MR imaging: new biometric data and possible clinical significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:795–802 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4258 pmid:25655869

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Polat A,
    2. Barlow S,
    3. Ber R, et al

    . Volumetric MRI study of the intrauterine growth restriction fetal brain. Eur Radiol 2017;27:2110–18 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4502-4 pmid:27491875

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Koo TK,
    2. Li MY

    . A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155–63 doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 pmid:27330520

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Choudhri AF

    . Pediatric Neuroradiology. Thieme; 2016
29. 29.↵
    1. Garel C

    . MRI of the Fetal Brain: Normal Development and Cerebral Pathologies. Springer; 2004
30. 30.↵
    1. Rossi AC,
    2. Prefumo F

    . Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:388–93 doi:10.1002/uog.13429 pmid:24890732

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Nagaraj UD,
    2. Kline-Fath BM

    . Clinical applications of fetal MRI in the brain. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:764 doi:10.3390/diagnostics12030764 pmid:35328317

    CrossRefPubMed