Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Benign Enhancing Foramen Magnum Lesions

I.T. Mark, D. Black, J.C. Benson, N.G. Campeau, D.R. Johnson, S.A. Messina, C. Giannini, I. Parney and P.P Morris
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2023, 44 (9) 999-1001; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7955
I.T. Mark
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M., D.B., J.B., N.G.C., D.R.J., S.A.M., P.P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesotta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for I.T. Mark
D. Black
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M., D.B., J.B., N.G.C., D.R.J., S.A.M., P.P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesotta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Black
J.C. Benson
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M., D.B., J.B., N.G.C., D.R.J., S.A.M., P.P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesotta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.C. Benson
N.G. Campeau
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M., D.B., J.B., N.G.C., D.R.J., S.A.M., P.P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesotta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N.G. Campeau
D.R. Johnson
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M., D.B., J.B., N.G.C., D.R.J., S.A.M., P.P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesotta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.R. Johnson
S.A. Messina
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M., D.B., J.B., N.G.C., D.R.J., S.A.M., P.P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesotta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.A. Messina
C. Giannini
bDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (C.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Giannini
I. Parney
cDepartment of Neurosurgery (I.P.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for I. Parney
P.P Morris
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M., D.B., J.B., N.G.C., D.R.J., S.A.M., P.P.M.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesotta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.P Morris
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Benign enhancing foramen magnum lesions have been previously described as T2-hyperintense small, enhancing lesions located posterior to the intradural vertebral artery. We present the first case with pathologic correlation. These lesions are fibrotic nodules adhering to the spinal accessory nerve. While they can enlarge with time on subsequent examinations, on the basis of the imaging characteristics and location, they do not necessitate surgical resection.

ABBREVIATIONS:

BEFML
benign enhancing foramen magnum lesions
HSL
high-signal lesions
SAN
spinal accessory nerve

The patient was a 45-year-old woman without significant medical history who presented with a 1-year history of bilateral eye pain. The initial MR imaging performed at an outside institution showed 2 small, enhancing intradural extramedullary lesions at the foramen magnum, posterior to the intradural vertebral arteries in the subarachnoid space. The leading differential at that time was peripheral nerve sheath tumor. She presented to our institution for further evaluation of the foramen magnum lesions and underwent a lumbar puncture to evaluate malignancy, which had negative findings. Given the presenting symptoms, she underwent facial electromyography that did not demonstrate findings of denervation. She also underwent a PET/CT, which revealed no abnormal radiotracer uptake in the enhancing foramen magnum lesions or elsewhere in the body. A catheter angiogram did not show vascular enhancement associated with the lesions. She underwent further MR imaging at our institution.

Imaging

Contrast-enhanced 3T MR imaging of the brain demonstrated 2 small, rounded avidly-enhancing intradural extramedullary lesions at the foramen magnum, posterior to the vertebral arteries, superior to their dural insertion (Fig 1). These lesions were hyperintense on T2-weighted FLAIR imaging, isointense to CSF and, therefore, undetectable on T2-weighted imaging, and did not have restricted diffusion or susceptibility-weighted artifact. Compared with the MR imaging from 9 months prior, they were slightly increased, measuring 8 × 6 × 7 mm on the left (previously 7 × 5 × 6 mm) and 5 × 4 × 5 mm on the right (previously 4 × 3 × 4 mm). Additionally, there was a third lesion just inferior to the right lesion and not within the FOV on the prior study. This lesion had imaging characteristics similar to those of the other lesions, measuring 7 × 6 × 8 mm, and was at the level of the dural puncture of the right vertebral artery. All 3 lesions were adjacent to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN). Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the remainder of the spine did not show any additional lesions. Given the growth during a short period, the differential diagnosis was broad and included peripheral nerve sheath tumors, metastatic disease, and inflammatory conditions such as a sarcoid. At this time, these lesions had not been previously described in the literature.1

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Multiple axial images show 2 intradural extramedullary lesions (solid arrows) at the foramen magnum posterior to the vertebral arteries, superior to their dural insertion. The lesions demonstrate hyperintense signal on T2-weighted FLAIR imaging (A), are isointense to CSF on T2-weighted imaging (B), and are avidly enhancing (C). FIESTA imaging (D) shows contact with the spinal accessory nerve (broken arrows).

Operative Report

Given the differential diagnoses, the patient underwent surgical resection with a midline suboccipital craniectomy and C1 laminectomy. The lesion on the left was near the vertebral artery and its branches but was not attached to them. It was adherent to a lower cranial nerve, identified as the left SAN on intraoperative nerve monitoring. The lesion was covered with a yellow membrane over an apparent cyst with a more solid and firm component deep to that (Fig 2). Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring indicated changes compatible with nerve irritation; therefore, a small amount of residual lesion densely adherent to the nerve was not resected. The right-sided lesions with mixed cystic and solid components were debulked because they were adherent to lower cranial nerve rootlets, suspected of being the SAN but not confirmed by electromyography. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course without findings of CSF leak or cranial nerve deficit.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Intraoperative photograph demonstrates the lesion with a superficial yellow membrane over an apparent cyst with a more solid and firm component deep to that. The lesion was adherent to a lower cranial nerve, identified as the left SAN on intraoperative nerve monitoring.

Pathology

Pathology received a specimen entirely composed of arachnoid tissue containing a small (11 mm), hypocellular, and densely fibrotic nodule without specific features as illustrated in Fig 3A. The nodule contained scant arachnoid cells separated by thick collagenous fibers (Fig 3B). There were no histologic features to suggest a neoplasm or meningioma. Only focally small nests of meningothelial cap cells with focal psammoma body formation were present in the overlying arachnoid membrane (Fig 3C), a finding commonly present in the arachnoid of adults, which tends to increase with advancing age.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

H&E sections of the resected specimen illustrate the densely fibrotic nodule (A), involving the arachnoid (B). Small nests of meningothelial cap cells with focal psammoma body formation are present (C), adjacent to the nodule.

DISCUSSION

This is the first pathology-proved case of benign enhancing foramen magnum lesions (BEFML). We found that these lesions are fibrotic arachnoid nodules adherent to the dorsal aspect of the SAN. It is important to demonstrate that these pathology-proved lesions are benign and do not need surgical resection.

McGuinness et al1 were the first to describe BEFML by their MR imaging appearance. They noted that the enhancing lesions were hyperintense on 3D T2-weighted FLAIR, round or ovoid in morphology, and posterior to the intradural vertebral artery. The lesions were thought to represent a venous varix or a ganglia/pseudoganglia of the C1 nerve or spinal roots of the SAN. The occult appearance on 2D T2-weighted imaging helps differentiate these lesions from the typical appearance of other lesions including meningioma, schwannoma, aneurysm, and metastasis.2 A minority of meningiomas, schwannomas, and metastatic diseases can appear T2 hyperintense but not necessarily occult on T2-weighted imaging. While cystic lesions such as arachnoid, neurenteric, or synovial cysts could be occult on T2, they would not enhance.3 Our patient presented and underwent surgery before the published work by McGuinness et al.

Rosskopf et al4 published a case report on the intraoperative appearance of BEFML without pathologic confirmation and thought that these lesions represented a venous structure. Antonucci et al5 presented a single case of a patient with intracranial melanoma metastases in addition to a small enhancing left foramen magnum lesion that remained stable for 18 months, suggesting a benign process.

The largest study of these foramen magnum lesions was performed by Kogue et al,6 who reviewed 3D T2-weighted FLAIR imaging of 3717 patients and found what they termed high-signal lesions (HSL) posterior to the intradural vertebral artery in 127 patients (3.4%). They noted that all lesions were in contact with the SAN. Their lesions had a mean maximum diameter of 3.8 mm, with an upper range of 11.5 mm. As was the case with our patient, they found that 8.7% of patients had foramen magnum lesions that increased in size with time. On follow-up imaging of our patient 1 year after resection, there were no signs of recurrence or progression. A subsequent study by Kogue et al7 using a 3D balanced fast-field echo sequence found that all lesions contacted the SAN.

The SAN is classically known as providing motor fibers to the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. However, other studies have suggested that the SAN may transmit sensory/nociceptive signals as well.8,9 Anatomically, the SAN has 2 origins: one that is derived from the upper 5 or 6 cervical spinal cord rootlets and the other arising from the brainstem. Some propose that the SAN starts with mixed motor and sensory components; however, the sensory neurons migrate to the spinal nerve. This process is often incomplete; therefore, neuron cell bodies can be found scattered throughout the nerve.10

Fahmy11 suggested that ganglion cells along the SAN migrate distally with age, given the greater abundance and conspicuity of ganglion cells in a 3-month-old child compared with an adult and greater in the distal SAN relative to proximal. In a postmortem study, Tubbs et al12 found that 14.8% of the specimens had focal enlargements contacting the dorsal aspect of the SAN at the foramen magnum. These enlargements were described as ectopic glial rests or heterotopias within the leptomeninges of the SAN and did not contain ganglion or neuronal cells.

Further work is needed to elucidate the true process that leads to these benign nodules associated with the SAN. Radiologists should be familiar with the typical appearance and benign nature of these lesions so that other entities do not have to be invoked in a differential diagnosis. This is the first work to show pathologic confirmation of what has been previously termed BEFML or HSL.

Case Summary

  • T2-hyperintense, enhancing, small lesions located posterior to the intradural vertebral artery at the foramen magnum have been previously described as BEFML or HSL.

  • Previous work has shown that a small percentage (8.7%) of these lesions increase in size.

  • These were previously presumed to be a venous varix or associated with the SAN.

  • This is the first pathology-proven case compatible with a fibrotic arachnoid nodule adherent to the leptomeninges of the SAN. While they can enlarge with time, they are benign and do not require treatment.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. McGuinness BJ,
    2. Morrison JP,
    3. Brew SK, et al
    . Benign enhancing foramen magnum lesions: clinical report of a newly recognized entity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:721–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5085 pmid:28154124
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Koeller KK,
    2. Shih RY
    . Intradural extramedullary spinal neoplasms: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2019;39:468–69 doi:10.1148/rg.2019180200 pmid:30844353
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Song G,
    3. Chen G, et al
    . Single-center clinical characteristics and treatment experience of foramen magnum neurenteric cyst: report of 6 cases and brief review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2018;112:e608–16 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.097 pmid:29374608
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rosskopf J,
    2. Schmitz B,
    3. Beer M, et al
    . Evidence for the vascular origin of benign enhancing foramen magnum lesions via intraoperative photographs: case report and review of the literature. Cureus 2021;13:e2075 doi:10.7759/cureus.20753 pmid:35111441
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Antonucci MU,
    2. Spampinato MV
    . Imaging findings of benign enhancing foramen magnum lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:E95–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5330 pmid:28729295
    FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kogue R,
    2. Maeda M,
    3. Umino M, et al
    . Small high-signal lesions posterior to the intracranial vertebral artery incidentally identified by 3D FLAIR: retrospective study of 127 patients. Neuroradiology 2018;60:591–97 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-2027-z pmid:29725694
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kogue R,
    2. Maeda M,
    3. Umino M, et al
    . Evaluation of a high-signal lesion posterior to the intracranial vertebral artery using 3D balanced fast-field echo imaging. Neuroradiology 2019;61:1199–202 doi:10.1007/s00234-019-02270-5 pmid:31388725
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Johal J,
    2. Iwanaga J,
    3. Tubbs K, et al
    . The accessory nerve: a comprehensive review of its anatomy, development, variations, landmarks and clinical considerations. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2019;302:620–29 doi:10.1002/ar.23823 pmid:29659160
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Tubbs RS,
    2. Benninger B,
    3. Loukas M, et al
    . Cranial roots of the accessory nerve exist in the majority of adult humans. Clin Anat 2014;27:102–07 doi:10.1002/ca.22125 pmid:22855423
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Boehm KE,
    2. Kondrashov P
    . Distribution of neuron cell bodies in the intraspinal portion of the spinal accessory nerve in humans. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2016;299:98–102 doi:10.1002/ar.23279 pmid:26474532
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fahmy N
    . A note on the intracranial and extracranial parts of the IXth, Xth and XIth nerves. J Anat 1927;61:3298–301 pmid:17104142
    PubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tubbs RS,
    2. Lancaster JR,
    3. Mortazavi MM, et al
    . Do grossly identifiable ganglia lie along the spinal accessory nerve? A gross and histologic study with potential neurosurgical significance. World Neurosurg 2012;77:349–51 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.04.030 pmid:22120387
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received May 21, 2023.
  • Accepted after revision June 27, 2023.
  • © 2023 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 44 (9)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 44, Issue 9
1 Sep 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Benign Enhancing Foramen Magnum Lesions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
I.T. Mark, D. Black, J.C. Benson, N.G. Campeau, D.R. Johnson, S.A. Messina, C. Giannini, I. Parney, P.P Morris
Benign Enhancing Foramen Magnum Lesions
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2023, 44 (9) 999-1001; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7955

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Benign Enhancing Foramen Magnum Lesions
I.T. Mark, D. Black, J.C. Benson, N.G. Campeau, D.R. Johnson, S.A. Messina, C. Giannini, I. Parney, P.P Morris
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2023, 44 (9) 999-1001; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7955
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Benign Enhancing Foramen Magnum Lesions
    Ryota Kogue, Masayuki Maeda, Seiya Kishi, Fumine Tanaka, Maki Umino, Hajime Sakuma
    Neurology 2024 103 11
  • Radiopaedia.org
    Laurens Cocker, Joshua Yap, Arlene Campos
    2018
  • Radiopaedia.org
    Thành Lê
    2024

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • ML for Glioma Molecular Subtype Prediction
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire