Changes of Time-Attenuation Curve Blood Flow Parameters in Patients with and without Carotid Stenosis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Raney R,
   3. Raney AA,
   4. Sanchez-Perez JM

   . The role of complete cerebral angiography in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 1949;6:222–37

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Luo Z,
   3. Wang D,
   4. Sun X, et al

   . Comparison of the accuracy of subtraction CT angiography performed on 320-detector row volume CT with conventional CT angiography for diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:118–22

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Petkova M,
   3. Gauvrit J-Y,
   4. Trystram D, et al

   . Three-dimensional dynamic time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA using parallel imaging and a variable rate k-space sampling strategy in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:7–12

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Strother CM,
   3. Bender F,
   4. Deuerling-Zheng Y, et al

   . Parametric color coding of digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:919–24

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Pereira V,
   3. Ouared R,
   4. Brina O, et al

   . Quantification of internal carotid artery flow with digital subtraction angiography: validation of an optical flow approach with Doppler ultrasound. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:156–63

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Xiang J,
   3. Tutino VM,
   4. Snyder KV, et al

   . CFD: computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination? The role of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1849–57

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Kefayati S,
   3. Poepping TL

   . Transitional flow analysis in the carotid artery bifurcation by proper orthogonal decomposition and particle image velocimetry. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:898–909

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Pasta S,
   3. Cho JS,
   4. Dur O, et al

   . Computer modeling for the prediction of thoracic aortic stent graft collapse. J Vasc Surg 2013;57:1353–61

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Huang TC,
   3. Wu TH,
   4. Lin CJ, et al

   . Peritherapeutic quantitative flow analysis of arteriovenous malformation on digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg 2012;56:812–15

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Lin CJ,
    3. Hung SC,
    4. Guo WY, et al

    . Monitoring peri-therapeutic cerebral circulation time: a feasibility study using color-coded quantitative DSA in patients with steno-occlusive arterial disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1685–90

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Shpilfoygel SD,
    3. Close RA,
    4. Valentino DJ, et al

    . X-ray videodensitometric methods for blood flow and velocity measurement: a critical review of literature. Med Phys 2000;27:2008–23

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Gölitz P,
    3. Struffert T,
    4. Lücking H, et al

    . Parametric color coding of digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistulas. Clin Neuroradiol 2013;23:113–20

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wilcox BR,
    3. Coulter NA,
    4. Rackley CE, et al

    . The effect of changing heart rate on blood flow, power dissipation, and resistance in the common carotid artery of man. Ann Surg 1970;171:24–30

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Greitz T

    . A radiologic study of the brain circulation by rapid serial angiography of the carotid artery. Acta Radiol Suppl 1956;1–123
15. 15.↵
    2. Lin CJ,
    3. Luo CB,
    4. Hung SC, et al

    . Application of color-coded digital subtraction angiography in treatment of indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas: initial experience. J Chin Med Assoc 2013;76:218–24

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Gado M,
    3. Eichling J,
    4. Grubb R, et al

    . Appraisal of the angiographic circulation time as an index of cerebral blood flow. Radiology 1975;115:107–12

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Calamante F

    . Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 2013;74:1–32

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Kudo K,
    3. Sasaki M,
    4. Ogasawara K, et al

    . Difference in tracer delay-induced effect among deconvolution algorithms in CT perfusion analysis: quantitative evaluation with digital phantoms. Radiology 2009;251:241–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Withers CE,
    3. Gosink BB,
    4. Keightley AM, et al

    . Duplex carotid sonography: peak systolic velocity in quantifying internal carotid artery stenosis. J Ultrasound Med 1990;9:345–49

    Abstract
21. 21.↵
    2. Blackshear WM,
    3. Phillips DJ,
    4. Chikos PM, et al

    . Carotid artery velocity patterns in normal and stenotic vessels. Stroke 1980;11:67–71

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Lin CJ,
    3. Chang FC,
    4. Tsai FY, et al

    . Stenotic transverse sinus predisposes to poststenting hyperperfusion syndrome as evidenced by quantitative analysis of peritherapeutic cerebral circulation time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1132–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Narita S,
    3. Aikawa H,
    4. Nagata S, et al

    . Intraprocedural prediction of hemorrhagic cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid artery stenting. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:615–19

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Aikawa H,
    3. Kazekawa K,
    4. Tsutsumi M, et al

    . Intraprocedural changes in angiographic cerebral circulation time predict cerebral blood flow after carotid artery stenting. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010;50:269–74

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Levitt MR,
    3. Morton RP,
    4. Haynor DR, et al

    . Angiographic perfusion imaging: real-time assessment of endovascular treatment for cerebral vasospasm. J Neuroimaging 2014;24:387–92

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Rhode KS,
    3. Lambrou T,
    4. Hawkes DJ, et al

    . Novel approaches to the measurement of arterial blood flow from dynamic digital x-ray images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:500–13

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Shobayashi Y,
    3. Tateshima S,
    4. Kakizaki R, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations by a self-expandable intracranial stent and flow diversion stent: high intra-aneurysmal pressure remains regardless of flow velocity reduction. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(suppl 3):iii38–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Waechter I,
    3. Bredno J,
    4. Hermans R, et al

    . Model-based blood flow quantification from rotational angiography. Med Image Anal 2008;12:586–602

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Waechter I,
    3. Bredno J,
    4. Weese J, et al

    . Using flow information to support 3D vessel reconstruction from rotational angiography. Med Phys 2008;35:3302–16

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Bogunović H,
    3. Loncarić S

    . Blood flow and velocity estimation based on vessel transit time by combining 2D and 3D X-ray angiography. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006;9(pt 2):117–24
31. 31.↵
    2. Davis B,
    3. Royalty K,
    4. Kowarschik M, et al

    . 4D digital subtraction angiography: implementation and demonstration of feasibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1914–21

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Hung SC,
    3. Lin CJ,
    4. Guo WY, et al

    . Toward the era of a one-stop imaging service using an angiography suite for neurovascular disorders. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:873614

    PubMed