Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

L.S. Babiarz; J.M. Romero; E.K. Murphy; B. Brobeck; P.W. Schaefer; R.G. González; M.H. Lev

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1464

Research ArticleHEAD & NECK

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González and M.H. Lev

American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1464

L.S. Babiarz

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

J.M. Romero

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

E.K. Murphy

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

B. Brobeck

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

P.W. Schaefer

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

R.G. González

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

M.H. Lev

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
Responses
References
PDF

Article Information

vol. 30 no. 4 761-768

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1464

PubMed

19164440

Published By

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Print ISSN

0195-6108

Online ISSN

1936-959X

History

Received September 18, 2008
Accepted after revision November 18, 2008
Published online April 7, 2009.

Author Information

L.S. Babiarza,
J.M. Romeroa,
E.K. Murphya,
B. Brobecka,
P.W. Schaefera,
R.G. Gonzáleza and
M.H. Leva

^aFrom the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass

Please address correspondence to Javier M. Romero, MD, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114; e-mail: jmromero{at}partners.org

View Full Text

Altmetrics

Cited By...

40 Citations
Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Imaging of acute stroke

José G. Merino, Steven Warach

Nature Reviews Neurology 2010 6 10
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Outcome after Stroke: A Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence

Tracy D Farr, Susanne Wegener

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2010 30 4
Carotid CTA: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality with the Use of Attenuation-Based, Automated Kilovolt Selection

A. Eller, W. Wuest, M. Kramer, M. May, A. Schmid, M. Uder, M. M. Lell

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 2
Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction

Takayuki Yamamoto, Koji Fujimoto, Tomohisa Okada, Yasutaka Fushimi, Aurelien F. Stalder, Yutaka Natsuaki, Michaela Schmidt, Kaori Togashi

Investigative Radiology 2016 51 6
Intraplaque High-Intensity Signal on 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Is Strongly Associated with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

A. Gupta, H. Baradaran, H. Kamel, A. Mangla, A. Pandya, V. Fodera, A. Dunning, P.C. Sanelli

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 3
Ischemic Stroke

Mara M. Kunst, Pamela W. Schaefer

Radiologic Clinics of North America 2011 49 1
MR Angiography at 3 Tesla to Assess Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Stenoses: Contrast-Enhanced or 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography?

J. Weber, P. Veith, B. Jung, G. Ihorst, O. Moske-Eick, S. Meckel, H. Urbach, C. A. Taschner

Clinical Neuroradiology 2015 25 1
Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis

Raffaella Pizzolato, Joshua A Hirsch, Javier M Romero

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2014 6 1
Automated quantification of carotid artery stenosis on contrast-enhanced MRA data using a deformable vascular tube model

Avan Suinesiaputra, Patrick J. H. de Koning, Elena Zudilova-Seinstra, Johan H. C. Reiber, Rob J. van der Geest

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2012 28 6
Computer‐assisted extraction of intracranial aneurysms on 3D rotational angiograms for computational fluid dynamics modeling

Herng‐Hua Chang, Gary R. Duckwiler, Daniel J. Valentino, Woei Chyn Chu

Medical Physics 2009 36 12
Interventional Neuroradiology

Fabio Settecase, Vitaliy L. Rayz

2021 176
Non-ECG-gated unenhanced MRA of the carotids: Optimization and clinical feasibility

H. Raoult, J. Y. Gauvrit, P. Schmitt, V. Le Couls, E. Bannier

European Radiology 2013 23 11
Time‐of‐flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF‐MRA) of the normal equine head

G. MANSO‐DÍAZ, M. I. GARCÍA‐REAL, C. CASTELEYN, F. SAN‐ROMÁN, O. TAEYMANS

Equine Veterinary Journal 2013 45 2
Time-of-flight angiography: a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced MR angiography and fat-suppressed T1w images for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection?

E. M. Coppenrath, N. Lummel, J. Linn, O. Lenz, M. Habs, K. Nikolaou, M. F. Reiser, M. Dichgans, T. Pfefferkorn, T. Saam

European Radiology 2013 23 10
Comparison of Non-invasive Imaging Studies in the Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis and Occlusion: CT Angiography, Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography

Junhyung Lee, Tae-Sub Chung, Kyung-Yul Lee, Sang Hyun Suh

Journal of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2011 15 3
Comparison of 3D TOF MRA with Contrast Enhanced MRA in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease

Jinha Choi, Soo Mee Lim, Yookyung Kim

Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology 2011 64 3
Evaluation of the supraaortic arteries using non-contrast-enhanced Velocity MR Angiography “Inhance”

Nina Lummel, Tobias Boeckh-Behrens, Juergen Lutz, Michael Burke, Jennifer Linn

Neuroradiology 2012 54 11
Evaluation of TOF MR Angiography and Imaging for the Half Scan Factor of Cerebral Artery

Young Jae Choi, Dae Cheol Kweon

Journal of the Korean Magnetics Society 2016 26 3
Neuroimaging Part I

Raffaella Pizzolato, Javier M. Romero

2016 135
Can intracranial time-of-flight-MR angiography predict extracranial carotid artery stenosis?

Filiz Osmanodja, Jan F. Scheitz, Jochen B. Fiebach, Ramanan Ganeshan, Kersten Villringer

Journal of Neurology 2022 269 5
In-Stent Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Giuseppe Di Gioia, Domenico Scordino, Cosimo Marco Campanale, Marco Miglionico, Antonio Creta, Claudio Proscia, Laura Ragni, Iginio Colaiori, Germano Di Sciascio

European Medical Journal 2016
MRI- and CT-venography in the diagnosis of hemodynamic disorders in patients suffering from lower extremities chronic venous disorders. Part II. Possibilities of MRI in diagnostics of the deep vein thrombosis

E. V. Shajdakov, A. B. Sannikov, V. M. Emelyanenko, L. N. Kryukova, A. E. Baranova, M. A. Rachkov

Medical Visualization 2021 25 1
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cerebrovascular Diseases-Stroke and Stroke-Related Conditions

Jeffrey S. Pannell, Amanda S. Corey, Robert Y. Shih, Matthew J. Austin, Sammy Chu, Melissa A. Davis, Andrew F. Ducruet, Christopher H. Hunt, Jana Ivanidze, Aleks Kalnins, Mary E. Lacy, Bruce M. Lo, Gavin Setzen, Matthew D. Shaines, Bruno P. Soares, Karl A. Soderlund, Ashesh A. Thaker, Lily L. Wang, Judah Burns

Journal of the American College of Radiology 2024 21 6
Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage is Associated with Acute Cerebral Ischemic Events and Progression of Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hye Ji Ryu, Se Jeong Jeon, See Sung Choi

Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2017 21 4
Multiple reader comparison of 2D TOF, 3D TOF, and CEMRA in screening of the carotid bifurcations: Time to reconsider routine contrast use?

Jeffrey S. Ross, Skye A. Buckner Petty, Waleed Brinjikji, Joseph M. Hoxworth, Vance T. Lehman, Erik H. Middlebrooks, Ameet C. Patel, Christopher P. Wood, Nick Todd

PLOS ONE 2020 15 9
Non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography techniques in candidates for kidney transplantation: A comparative study

Anne Dorte Blankholm, Bodil Ginnerup-Pedersen, Brian Stausbøl-Grøn, Margit Haislund, Sussie Laustsen, Steffen Ringgaard

Radiography 2013 19 3
Stroke

Steven Warach, Alison E. Baird, Krishna A. Dani, Max Wintermark, Chelsea S. Kidwell

2011
Blood Flow Measurement with Phase Contrast MRI According to Flip Angle in the Ascending Aorta

Moon Sun Kim, Dae Cheol Kweon

Journal of the Korean Magnetics Society 2016 26 4
Compensation for Signal Voids Caused by Turbulent Flow in Stenotic Vessels at 7T MRI: A Preliminary Study

Chang-Ki Kang, Sang-Hoon Kim, Nambeom Kim, Yeong-Bae Lee

Applied Magnetic Resonance 2016 47 4
Diagnostic Imaging: Brain

2016
Differential Assessment of Internal Jugular Vein Stenosis in Patients Undergoing CT and MRI with Contrast

Mohamad Abdalkader, Matthew I. Miller, Piers Klein, Ferdinand K. Hui, Jeffrey J. Siracuse, Asim Z. Mian, Osamu Sakai, Thanh N. Nguyen, Bindu N. Setty

Tomography 2024 10 2
Evidence-Based Neuroimaging Diagnosis and Treatment

Yasha Kadkhodayan, Colin P. Derdeyn, Alex M. Barrocas

2013
Imaging in Neurology

2016
Medical Imaging Contrast Agents: A Clinical Manual

Cesur Samanci

2021
PanVascular Medicine

Seth Stalcup, Jason Johnson, Javier Romero

2014
PanVascular Medicine

Seth Stalcup, Jason Johnson, Javier Romero

2015
Problem Solving in Cardiovascular Imaging

Jason M. Johnson, Anna Meader, David T. Hunt, Javier M. Romero

2013
Stroke

Maarten G. Lansberg, Max Wintermark, Chelsea S. Kidwell, Gregory W. Albers

2022
Stroke

Maarten G. Lansberg, Max Wintermark, Chelsea S. Kidwell, Steven Warach, Gregory W. Albers

2016
Vascular Imaging of the Central Nervous System

Mauricio Castillo, Juan Camilo Márquez, Francisco José Medina

2014

PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Vol. 30, Issue 4

April 2009

Table of Contents
Index by author

Download PDF

Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email *

Your Name *

Send To *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology

Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.

Your Personal Message

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Cite this article

L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González, M.H. Lev

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1464

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

0 Responses

Respond to this article

Bookmark this article

User Name *

Password *

Remember my user name & password.

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González, M.H. Lev

American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1464

Share This Article:

Tweet Widget
Facebook Like
Google Plus One

Purchase

Jump to section

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
Responses
References
PDF

No related articles found.

PubMed
Google Scholar

Cited By...

Intraplaque High-Intensity Signal on 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Is Strongly Associated with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
Carotid CTA: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality with the Use of Attenuation-Based, Automated Kilovolt Selection
Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis

Crossref (40)
Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Imaging of acute stroke

José G. Merino, Steven Warach

Nature Reviews Neurology 2010 6 10
Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Outcome after Stroke: A Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence

Tracy D Farr, Susanne Wegener

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2010 30 4
Carotid CTA: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality with the Use of Attenuation-Based, Automated Kilovolt Selection

A. Eller, W. Wuest, M. Kramer, M. May, A. Schmid, M. Uder, M. M. Lell

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 2
Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction

Takayuki Yamamoto, Koji Fujimoto, Tomohisa Okada, Yasutaka Fushimi, Aurelien F. Stalder, Yutaka Natsuaki, Michaela Schmidt, Kaori Togashi

Investigative Radiology 2016 51 6
Intraplaque High-Intensity Signal on 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Is Strongly Associated with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis

A. Gupta, H. Baradaran, H. Kamel, A. Mangla, A. Pandya, V. Fodera, A. Dunning, P.C. Sanelli

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2014 35 3
Ischemic Stroke

Mara M. Kunst, Pamela W. Schaefer

Radiologic Clinics of North America 2011 49 1
MR Angiography at 3 Tesla to Assess Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Stenoses: Contrast-Enhanced or 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography?

J. Weber, P. Veith, B. Jung, G. Ihorst, O. Moske-Eick, S. Meckel, H. Urbach, C. A. Taschner

Clinical Neuroradiology 2015 25 1
Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis

Raffaella Pizzolato, Joshua A Hirsch, Javier M Romero

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2014 6 1
Automated quantification of carotid artery stenosis on contrast-enhanced MRA data using a deformable vascular tube model

Avan Suinesiaputra, Patrick J. H. de Koning, Elena Zudilova-Seinstra, Johan H. C. Reiber, Rob J. van der Geest

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2012 28 6
Computer‐assisted extraction of intracranial aneurysms on 3D rotational angiograms for computational fluid dynamics modeling

Herng‐Hua Chang, Gary R. Duckwiler, Daniel J. Valentino, Woei Chyn Chu

Medical Physics 2009 36 12

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

Article Information

Author Information

Altmetrics

Cited By...

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Similar Articles

Indexed Content

Cases

Special Collections

Resources

Multimedia

About Us

American Society of Neuroradiology