Research ArticleHead and Neck Imaging
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González and M.H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1464
L.S. Babiarz
J.M. Romero
E.K. Murphy
B. Brobeck
P.W. Schaefer
R.G. González

Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No eLetters have been published for this article.
In this issue
Advertisement
L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González, M.H. Lev
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1464
Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. González, M.H. Lev
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2009, 30 (4) 761-768; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1464
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Intraplaque High-Intensity Signal on 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography Is Strongly Associated with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
- Carotid CTA: Radiation Exposure and Image Quality with the Use of Attenuation-Based, Automated Kilovolt Selection
- Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement