Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining ≥70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

References

1. ↵
   Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis—European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet 1991;337:1235–43

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1998;97:501–09

   FREE Full Text
4. ↵
   Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179–85

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:21–28

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-Leon J, Escribano J, et al. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1012–19

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. ↵
   Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B, et al. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1117–22

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. Powers WJ. Carotid arteriography: still golden after all these years? Neurology 2004;62:1246–47

   FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   Maldonado TS. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference? Semin Vasc Surg 2007;20:205–15

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–07, discussion 1408–11

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182:243–46

    PubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Hankey GJ, Warlow CP. Symptomatic carotid ischaemic events: safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography, before carotid endarterectomy. BMJ 1990;300:1485–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Buskens E, Nederkoorn PJ, Buijs-Van Der Woude T, et al. Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology 2004;233:101–12

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Nicol L, Pruvo JP. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review. Neuroradiology 1999;41:867–74

    CrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    Back MR, Wilson JS, Rushing G, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:429–38, discussion 439–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Carr JC, Shaibani A, Russell E, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid circulation. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:349–57

    CrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:213–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 2004;63:457–60

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    Prokop M, Waaijer A, Kreuzer S. CT angiography of the carotid arteries. JBR-BTR 2004;87:23–29
20. ↵
    Romero JM, Ackerman RH, Dault NA, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: indications, strategies, and accuracy. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15:351–65, xi

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    Mustert BR, Williams DM, Prince MR. In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:301–10

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1779–84

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    Yang CW, Carr JC, Futterer SF, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2095–101

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. ↵
    Timaran CH, Rosero EB, Valentine RJ, et al. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:257–63, discussion 263–64

    CrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    Gibson SE, Farver CF, Prayson RA. Multiorgan involvement in nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy: an autopsy case and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:209–12

    PubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 2007;243:148–57

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Leclerc X, Godefroy O, Pruvo JP, et al. Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1995;26:1577–81

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. Leclerc X, Godefroy O, Lucas C, et al. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering. Radiology 1999;210:673–82

    PubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    Lev MH, Romero JM, Goodman DN, et al. Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1123–29

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    Herzig R, Burval S, Krupka B, et al. Comparison of ultrasonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid stenoses. Eur J Neurol 2004;11:774–81

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    Koelemay MJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, et al. Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 2004;35:2306–12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, et al. Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, et al. Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusion by using CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:632–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. ↵
    Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, et al Carotid stenosis index revisited with direct CT angiography measurement of carotid arteries to quantify carotid stenosis. Stroke 2007;38:286–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    Saba L, Caddeo G, Sanfilippo R, et al. Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:716–23

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. ↵
    Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Pirisi R, et al. Multidetector-row CT angiography in the study of atherosclerotic carotid arteries. Neuroradiology 2007;49:623–37

    CrossRefPubMed
37. ↵
    Saba L, Mallarini G. MDCTA of carotid plaque degree of stenosis: evaluation of interobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:W41–46

    CrossRefPubMed
38. ↵
    Napoli A, Fleischmann D, Chan FP, et al. Computed tomography angiography: state-of-the-art imaging using multidetector-row technology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28 (suppl 1):S32–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    de Weert TT, Ouhlous M, Meijering E, et al. In vivo characterization and quantification of atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multidetector computed tomography and histopathological correlation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2006;26:2366–72

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    Wintermark M, Jawadi SS, Rapp JH, et al. High-resolution CT imaging of carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:875–82. Epub 2008 Feb 13

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. ↵
    Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986;21:720–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003;229:3–8

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. ↵
    Johnston DC, Goldstein LB. Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology 2001;56:1009–15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    Berg M, Zhang Z, Ikonen A, et al. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1022–34

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. ↵
    Wardlaw JM, Chappell FM, Best JJ, et al. Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:1503–12

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
46. ↵
    Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke 2003;34:660–64

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. ↵
    Babiarz LS, Astor B, Mohamed MA, et al. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography with high-resolution black blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing carotid artery stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:63–70

    CrossRefPubMed
48. ↵
    Pomerantz SR, Harris GJ, Desai HJ, et al. Computed tomography angiography and computed tomography perfusion in ischemic stroke: a step-by-step approach to image acquisition and three-dimensional postprocessing. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006;27:243–70

    CrossRefPubMed
49. ↵
    Kniemeyer HW, Aulich A, Schlachetzki F, et al. Pseudo- and segmental occlusion of the internal carotid artery: a new classification, surgical treatment and results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:310–20

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. ↵
    Lell M, Fellner C, Baum U, et al. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis with multisection CT and MR imaging: influence of imaging modality and postprocessing. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:104–10

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. ↵
    Silvennoinen HM, Ikonen S, Soinne L, et al. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:97–103

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. ↵
    Furst G, Hofer M, Sitzer M, et al. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:692–99

    PubMed
53. ↵
    Lev MH, Romero JM, Gonzalez RG. Flow voids in time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis? It depends on the TE! AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2120

    FREE Full Text
54. ↵
    Randoux B, Marro B, Marsault C. Carotid artery stenosis: competition between CT angiography and MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:663–64, author reply 664

    FREE Full Text
55. ↵
    Runck F, Steiner RP, Bautz WA, et al. MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1736–42

    Abstract/FREE Full Text