Index by author
Avins, A.L.
- EDITOR'S CHOICESpineOpen AccessLumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine InjectionsF.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. FriedlyAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050
In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.
Bach, J.P.
- Adult BrainYou have accessIncreased Water Content in Periventricular Caps in Patients without Acute HydrocephalusT. Sichtermann, J.K. Furtmann, S. Dekeyzer, G. Gilmour, A.M. Oros-Peusquens, J.P. Bach, M. Wiesmann, N.J. Shah and O. NikoubashmanAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 784-787; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6033
Baek, J.W.
- InterventionalYou have accessPointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition with Subtraction-Based MRA during the Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Anterior Circulation AneurysmsY.J. Heo, H.W. Jeong, J.W. Baek, S.T. Kim, Y.G. Jeong, J.Y. Lee and S.-C. JinAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 815-819; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6035
Ballweber, M.K.
- Head & NeckOpen AccessReduced Jet Velocity in Venous Flow after CSF Drainage: Assessing Hemodynamic Causes of Pulsatile TinnitusH. Haraldsson, J.R. Leach, E.I. Kao, A.G. Wright, S.G. Ammanuel, R.S. Khangura, M.K. Ballweber, C.T. Chin, V.N. Shah, K. Meisel, D.A. Saloner and M.R. AmansAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 849-854; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6043
Bardo, D.M.E.
- PediatricsYou have accessComparison of Iterative Model Reconstruction versus Filtered Back-Projection in Pediatric Emergency Head CT: Dose, Image Quality, and Image-Reconstruction TimesR.N. Southard, D.M.E. Bardo, M.H. Temkit, M.A. Thorkelson, R.A. Augustyn and C.A. MartinotAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 866-871; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6034
Bauer, Z.
- EDITOR'S CHOICESpineOpen AccessLumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine InjectionsF.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. FriedlyAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050
In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.
Benders, M.J.N.L.
- PediatricsYou have accessBrain and CSF Volumes in Fetuses and Neonates with Antenatal Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease: A Longitudinal MRI StudyN.H.P. Claessens, N. Khalili, I. Isgum, H. ter Heide, T.J. Steenhuis, E. Turk, N.J.G. Jansen, L.S. de Vries, J.M.P.J. Breur, R. de Heus and M.J.N.L. BendersAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 885-891; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6021
Berenstein, A.
- InterventionalYou have accessAngiographic and Clinical Features of Noninvoluting Congenital HemangiomasA. Patel, R. De Leacy and A. BerensteinAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 845-848; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6044
Bharatha, A.
- Adult BrainYou have accessThe Central Vein Sign in Radiologically Isolated SyndromeS. Suthiphosuwan, P. Sati, M. Guenette, X. Montalban, D.S. Reich, A. Bharatha and J. OhAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 776-783; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6045
Biegel, J.
- FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBPediatricsYou have accessPediatric Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors of the Brain: Identification of Metabolic Subgroups Using In Vivo 1H-MR SpectroscopyB. Tamrazi, S. Venneti, A. Margol, D. Hawes, S.Y. Cen, M. Nelson, A. Judkins, J. Biegel and S. BlümlAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 872-877; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6024
Twenty patients with confirmed atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors who underwent MR spectroscopy were included in this study. In vivo metabolite levels of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors were compared with molecular subtypes assessed by achaete-scute homolog 1 expression. In vivo creatine concentrations were higher in tumors that demonstrated achaete-scute homolog 1 expression compared with those without achaete-scute homolog 1 expression. Additionally, levels of myo-inositol were significantly different, whereas lipids approached significance in these 2 cohorts. Higher brain-specific creatine kinase levels were observed in the cohort with achaete-scute homolog 1 expression.
In this issue
