Image Quality of Low-Dose Cerebral Angiography and Effectiveness of Clinical Implementation on Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Procedures for Intracranial Aneurysms

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Valentin J

   . Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85. Ann ICRP 2000;30:7–67 doi:10.1016/S0146-6453(01)00004-5

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Food U,
   3. Administration D

   . Avoidance of serious X-ray-induced skin injuries to patients during fluoroscopically-guided procedures. Med Bull 1994;24:7–17
3. 3.↵
   2. Wagner LK,
   3. Eifel PJ,
   4. Geise RA

   . Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1994;5:71–84 doi:10.1016/S1051-0443(94)71456-1 pmid:8136601

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Mahesh M

   . Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues. Radiographics 2001;21:1033–45 doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.4.g01jl271033 pmid:11452079

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Suzuki S,
   3. Furui S,
   4. Matsumaru Y, et al

   . Patient skin dose during neuroembolization by multiple-point measurement using a radiosensitive indicator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1076–81 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1045 pmid:18388215

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Chun CW,
   3. Kim BS,
   4. Lee CH, et al

   . Patient radiation dose in diagnostic and interventional procedures for intracranial aneurysms: experience at a single center. Korean J Radiol 2014;15:844–49 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.6.844 pmid:25469098

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Söderman M,
   3. Holmin S,
   4. Andersson T, et al

   . Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology 2013;269:553–60 doi:10.1148/radiol.13121262 pmid:23737536

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Söderman M,
   3. Mauti M,
   4. Boon S, et al

   . Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1365–72 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1276-0 pmid:24005833

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Schneider T,
   3. Wyse E,
   4. Pearl MS

   . Analysis of radiation doses incurred during diagnostic cerebral angiography after the implementation of dose reduction strategies. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:384–88 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012204 pmid:27056919

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Honarmand AR,
    3. Shaibani A,
    4. Pashaee T, et al

    . Subjective and objective evaluation of image quality in biplane cerebral digital subtraction angiography following significant acquisition dose reduction in a clinical setting. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:297–301 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012296 pmid:27053704

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Pearl MS,
    3. Torok C,
    4. Katz Z, et al

    . Diagnostic quality and accuracy of low dose 3D-DSA protocols in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:386–90 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011137 pmid:24714612

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Vano E,
    3. Fernandez JM,
    4. Sanchez RM, et al

    . Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:277–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3211 pmid:22859286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Yi HJ,
    3. Sung JH,
    4. Lee DH, et al

    . Analysis of radiation doses and dose reduction strategies during cerebral digital subtraction angiography. World Neurosurg 2017;100:216–23 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.01.004 pmid:28089806

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Schneider T,
    3. Wyse E,
    4. Pearl MS

    . Analysis of radiation doses incurred during diagnostic cerebral angiography after the implementation of dose reduction strategies. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:384–88 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012204 pmid:27056919

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kahn EN,
    3. Gemmete JJ,
    4. Chaudhary N, et al

    . Radiation dose reduction during neurointerventional procedures by modification of default settings on biplane angiography equipment. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:819–23 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011891 pmid:26245735

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Ihn YK,
    3. Kim BS,
    4. Byun JS, et al

    . Patient radiation exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter study. Neurointervention 2016;11:78–85 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.78 pmid:27621943

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Hassan AE,
    3. Amelot S

    . Radiation exposure during neurointerventional procedures in modern biplane angiographic systems: a single-site experience. Interv Neurol 2017;6:105–16 doi:10.1159/000456622 pmid:29118787

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. D'Ercole L,
    3. Thyrion FZ,
    4. Bocchiola M, et al

    . Proposed local diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional neuroradiology and a preliminary analysis according to the complexity of the procedures. Phys Med 2012;28:61–70 doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.10.008 pmid:21074469

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Aroua A,
    3. Rickli H,
    4. Stauffer JC, et al

    . How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1621–33 doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0463-3 pmid:17072616

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Verdun FR,
    3. Aroua A,
    4. Trueb PR, et al

    . Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:188–91 doi:10.1093/rpd/nch547 pmid:15933106

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Brambilla M,
    3. Marano G,
    4. Dominietto M, et al

    . Patient radiation doses and references levels in interventional radiology. Radiol Med 2004;107:408–18 pmid:15103292

    PubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Nickoloff EL,
    3. Lu ZF,
    4. Dutta AK, et al

    . Radiation dose descriptors: BERT, COD, DAP, and other strange creatures. Radiographics 2008;28:1439–50 doi:10.1148/rg.285075748 pmid:18794317

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Bogaert E,
    3. Bacher K,
    4. Lemmens K, et al

    . A large-scale multicentre study of patient skin doses in interventional cardiology: dose-area product action levels and dose reference levels. Br J Radiol 2009;82:303–12 doi:10.1259/bjr/29449648 pmid:19124567

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Cheung NK,
    3. Boutchard M,
    4. Carr MW, et al

    . Radiation exposure, and procedure and fluoroscopy times in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a methodological comparison. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:902–06 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013596 pmid:29317468

    Abstract/FREE Full Text